Randolph is the problem

Post #21 » by **moocow007** » Fri Jan 4, 2008 11:55 pm

The biggest problem...

Without him you probably wouldn't have had...

Which wouldn't have led to him...

..or him..

..or him...

...or him...

...or (well you get the idea)...

StutterStep · Post #22 » by **StutterStep** » Fri Jan 4, 2008 11:58 pm

Spykes wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Zach was coming off a career year when Portland moved him to NY, and all they were able to get was Francis and Frye. No matter how well he plays, you guys won't be able to get much value for him.

That said, to pin point all of the Knicks problems on Zach is completely wrong. He's probably not helping things at all, but there's nothing to say that the Knicks would be a playoff team without him.

That is so not true!!!

Your GM did not want him to stay in the west and teams (NJ, Chicago) that needed him either were too cheap or believed the negativity attached to him while playing in Portland.

ctorres · Post #23 » by **ctorres** » Sat Jan 5, 2008 12:02 am

Had Tim Thomas been healthy in that Nets series, I think the Knicks would have won at least 2 games rather than get swept. Games 3 and 4 in that series could have gone in favor of the Knicks.

mildred · Post #24 » by **mildred** » Sat Jan 5, 2008 12:06 am

moocow007 wrote:The biggest problem...

(picture)

Without him you probably wouldn't have had...

(picture)

Which wouldn't have led to him...

(picture)

..or him..

(picture)

..or him...

(picture)

...or him...

(picture)

...or him...

(picture)

...or him...

(picture)

...or (well you get the idea)...

Huey Freeman · Post #25 » by **Huey Freeman** » Sat Jan 5, 2008 12:08 am

Spykes wrote:Zach was coming off a career year when Portland moved him to NY, and all they were able to get was Francis and Frye. No matter how well he plays, you guys won't be able to get much value for him.

EXACTLY.

Post #26 » by **duetta** » Sat Jan 5, 2008 12:10 am

The problem is the man who brought Zack here. Zach played hard when he got here, and he is certainly an extremely talented offensive player. But Isiah took a huge risk in bringing him here - especially given what he surrendered to acquire Curry. And now this trade has led to Curry coming apart at the seams. And you can't say that this risk wasn't always present. Some of us pointed out the risks the night of the trade, and then afterwards. When fans are better judges on what your team needs, you really need to be considering another line of work...

Post #27 » by **Spykes** » Sat Jan 5, 2008 12:13 am

StutterStep wrote:Your GM did not want him to stay in the west and teams (NJ, Chicago) that needed him either were too cheap or believed the negativity attached to him while playing in Portland.

Whatever helps you sleep and night...

cmaff051 · Post #28 » by **cmaff051** » Sat Jan 5, 2008 12:18 am

StutterStep wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

That is so not true!!!

Your GM did not want him to stay in the west and teams (NJ, Chicago) that needed him either were too cheap or believed the negativity attached to him while playing in Portland.

That is completely untrue and I have no idea why you made it up.

Post #29 » by **NoLayupRule** » Sat Jan 5, 2008 12:40 am

general wrote:Randolph is the problem

its totally true

Since Randolph Morris came here its been all downhill, and fast!!!

Cut him!!!!

Randolph is the problem

Re: Randolph is the problem

Re: Randolph is the problem