Post#170 » by JoeT » Sat Jan 5, 2008 3:21 am
My perception is that Hillary is the least electable of the three major democratic candidates, and by a long shot. She comes off as extremely manipulative and seems to only say what she thinks people want to hear, while I've noticed she's had trouble concisely defending her stances in debates when questioned. I think most people can see through that, and I think if she was elected, it'd be more of the same bull going on in the White House. Edwards and Obama come off as much more genuine with their opinions, and while I'm sure they're not as idealistic as they portray themselves to be, they seem to be more committed to fixing things than Hillary is, or any other candidate I can recall from recent memory. Also throw in that Edwards and Obama seem to share opinions on many issues (they've gotten into some 2-vs-1 arguments with Hillary in debates), and that should make them even more electable, as Edwards is very likely to be Obama's VP running mate from the way I see it, while I don't see either of them wanting to VP for Hillary.