RealGM

3toheadmelo wrote:

Chanel Bomber wrote:

3toheadmelo wrote:bro they won the chip, of course they're loaded
murray still played more games than randle. so jokic had more help than brunson did this season. jokic also has porter jr, aaron gordon (whos good, he had a big impact in their post season), 3 and d KCP and a bunch of high level role players off the bench (braun and peyton watson had breakout years).

embiid rightfully won last season if you asked me. he was the best player in the regular season. playoffs is a different story

sga and jokic had way more help than brunson did so of course their team records are going to be better. not only did we lose randle, we also didn't have OG for a while, ihart playing on one achilles the whole year, mitch out for majority of the year. and we still finished 2nd seed. i feel like you're severely underrating brunson to stan for jokic. be better chanel! lol

Denver had the better record, playing in a tougher conference, getting the same #2 seed as the Knicks, with all the individual impact stats hugely favoring Jok. There's no serious case for Jalen.

Brunson has had an incredible season worthy of a top 5 MVP case and All-NBA first team. I just think that putting him in the conversation with Jokic and SGA is either hyperbolic or premature. Those two and Embiid were in a class of their own this season in terms of impact. They've been playing at an all-time great level. Brunson has been great all season but he's just not on that historical tier yet.

All the metrics favor Jok and SGA (and Embiid who's not eligible). With the Knicks having a worse record than Denver and OKC, I really don't see the case for MVP. But first team All-NBA should be in play.

Jokic was better than Embiid by virtually every metric last season. The Embiid case was purely narrative driven. I thought Embiid was the clear-cut MVP this year until the injury, however.

you only looking at advanced stats. just a true terrible person chanel. i see why guan0 backstabbed you.

Read on Twitter

knicksNOTslick wrote:

Galvationknicks wrote:

Wildcat wrote:
They wanted to get out of the 2/3 spot, which would be Miami/Philly. Throwing the game was more of a reaction to Bucks losing. If they won, and everyone else, they would be division champs and break the tie-breaker with both Bucks and Knicks. Poor display of sportsmanship. I can imagine any real competitor would be happy.

That's only if we lost them they would've. I went over to their board. They seem to be happy if they win a series and that's all

Last year's playoffs really did a number on them. They were supposed to be an up and coming team but then Brunson outplays DMitchell, Garland looked shook for half the series and then their bigs got bullied. Now their expectations are low because they know deep down they've got a soft team and they won't retool because they gave up a lot for Donovan so they can't lose him for nothing.

mpharris36 wrote:

Chanel Bomber wrote:Jokic, Luka, SGA, Giannis and Tatum are elite-of-the-elite players.

Tatum is the only one who Brunson surpasses in some impact metrics, and he's the clear-cut best player on the best team. Otherwise there's a pretty clear separation between the other 4 and Brunson statistically.

And those metrics do factor in context.

Brunson being in top 5 MVP voting and All-NBA conversations is significant enough. There's no need to act like he's being robbed for not making first team. The guys above him are legends.

Not sure I would use the word "legend" for all those players.

I see two legends (Jokic and Giannis). I need more playoff success to put the rest in "legend" status. Luka probably closest to those 2 but needs to show out this post season. Tatum also needs to seal the deal since the celtics are by far the most talented team. Looking forward to seeing SGA running the show in his first post season as a true contender.

Chanel Bomber wrote:Jokic, Luka, SGA, Giannis and Tatum are elite-of-the-elite players.

Tatum is the only one who Brunson surpasses in some impact metrics, and he's the clear-cut best player on the best team. Otherwise there's a pretty clear separation between the other 4 and Brunson statistically.

And those metrics do factor in context.

Brunson being in top 5 MVP voting and All-NBA conversations is significant enough. There's no need to act like he's being robbed for not making first team. The guys above him are legends.

Guano wrote:

Chanel Bomber wrote:Jokic, Luka, SGA, Giannis and Tatum are elite-of-the-elite players.

Tatum is the only one who Brunson surpasses in some impact metrics, and he's the clear-cut best player on the best team. Otherwise there's a pretty clear separation between the other 4 and Brunson statistically.

And those metrics do factor in context.

Brunson being in top 5 MVP voting and All-NBA conversations is significant enough. There's no need to act like he's being robbed for not making first team. The guys above him are legends.

So is Brunson

Chanel Bomber wrote:

3toheadmelo wrote:

Chanel Bomber wrote:Denver had the better record, playing in a tougher conference, getting the same #2 seed as the Knicks, with all the individual impact stats hugely favoring Jok. There's no serious case for Jalen.

Brunson has had an incredible season worthy of a top 5 MVP case and All-NBA first team. I just think that putting him in the conversation with Jokic and SGA is either hyperbolic or premature. Those two and Embiid were in a class of their own this season in terms of impact. They've been playing at an all-time great level. Brunson has been great all season but he's just not on that historical tier yet.

All the metrics favor Jok and SGA (and Embiid who's not eligible). With the Knicks having a worse record than Denver and OKC, I really don't see the case for MVP. But first team All-NBA should be in play.

Jokic was better than Embiid by virtually every metric last season. The Embiid case was purely narrative driven. I thought Embiid was the clear-cut MVP this year until the injury, however.

you only looking at advanced stats. just a true terrible person chanel. i see why guan0 backstabbed you.

Read on Twitter

Oh we posting KnicksMuse now

I see, I see

Stop being so desperate 3toheadknicksmuse!!! Be better 3tohead, BE BETTER!!!!!!

god shammgod wrote:the same argument people make for not trying to pick your opponent is the same argument people make for not throwing games at the end of the season to try to improve your draft pick. don't cheat the game or whatever silly sh*t. the sad fact is the knicks will be playing the 2nd round in the 1st round this year.

3toheadmelo wrote:

Chanel Bomber wrote:

3toheadmelo wrote:you only looking at advanced stats. just a true terrible person chanel. i see why guan0 backstabbed you.

Read on Twitter

Oh we posting KnicksMuse now

I see, I see

Stop being so desperate 3toheadknicksmuse!!! Be better 3tohead, BE BETTER!!!!!!

You’re only talking about advanced stats!!! Mf are you related to Morey??!! Analytics ruined basketball talk!!!!

Guano wrote:

Chanel Bomber wrote:Jokic, Luka, SGA, Giannis and Tatum are elite-of-the-elite players.

Tatum is the only one who Brunson surpasses in some impact metrics, and he's the clear-cut best player on the best team. Otherwise there's a pretty clear separation between the other 4 and Brunson statistically.

And those metrics do factor in context.

Brunson being in top 5 MVP voting and All-NBA conversations is significant enough. There's no need to act like he's being robbed for not making first team. The guys above him are legends.

So is Brunson

god shammgod wrote:the same argument people make for not trying to pick your opponent is the same argument people make for not throwing games at the end of the season to try to improve your draft pick. don't cheat the game or whatever silly sh*t. the sad fact is the knicks will be playing the 2nd round in the 1st round this year.

EnigmatiC wrote:Giannis can not be top 5 in MVP this year. That team was way too disappointing. People had them penciled in for 60 wins and battling Boston for the top seed before the season started and they didn't even crack 50 wins.

EnigmatiC wrote:Giannis can not be top 5 in MVP this year. That team was way too disappointing. People had them penciled in for 60 wins and battling Boston for the top seed before the season started and they didn't even crack 50 wins.

Deeeez Knicks wrote:

EnigmatiC wrote:Giannis can not be top 5 in MVP this year. That team was way too disappointing. People had them penciled in for 60 wins and battling Boston for the top seed before the season started and they didn't even crack 50 wins.

Yea, Brunson had a better season than Giannis and deserves the spot over him.

Synciere wrote:

knicksNOTslick wrote:

Galvationknicks wrote:That's only if we lost them they would've. I went over to their board. They seem to be happy if they win a series and that's all

Last year's playoffs really did a number on them. They were supposed to be an up and coming team but then Brunson outplays DMitchell, Garland looked shook for half the series and then their bigs got bullied. Now their expectations are low because they know deep down they've got a soft team and they won't retool because they gave up a lot for Donovan so they can't lose him for nothing.

Winning a playoff series would be growth for them. Steady progression is usually how this goes. I get it.

Growth for the Knicks would be the Conference finals. That’s what makes the possibility of playing the Sixers in the first round so unsettling. They’re not a real 7th or 8th seed. 31-8 with Embiid makes them a #2 seed at worst over a full season. I’m not for tanking/throwing games for seeding and definitely don’t want to duck anyone, but matchups matter.

The best way for the Cavs to keep Spida is a deep playoff run this year.

Chanel Bomber wrote:

mpharris36 wrote:

Chanel Bomber wrote:Jokic, Luka, SGA, Giannis and Tatum are elite-of-the-elite players.

Tatum is the only one who Brunson surpasses in some impact metrics, and he's the clear-cut best player on the best team. Otherwise there's a pretty clear separation between the other 4 and Brunson statistically.

And those metrics do factor in context.

Brunson being in top 5 MVP voting and All-NBA conversations is significant enough. There's no need to act like he's being robbed for not making first team. The guys above him are legends.

Not sure I would use the word "legend" for all those players.

I see two legends (Jokic and Giannis). I need more playoff success to put the rest in "legend" status. Luka probably closest to those 2 but needs to show out this post season. Tatum also needs to seal the deal since the celtics are by far the most talented team. Looking forward to seeing SGA running the show in his first post season as a true contender.

Luka and Tatum will likeky be remembered as legends too, though most likely a tier below Jok. They're on course, with a pretty strong resume already to build on. And this season only solidified that trajectory.

SGA's regular season rivaled Bron and MJ's prime years. Maybe just a notch below, but that's the territory he was in this year. 30+ ppg on 110 (!!!) TS+ as a guard, with All-NBA defense. His all-around impact was just greater than Brunson's. And if he keeps it up, he will enter an exclusive realm.

Brunson was incredible this year but he was not on that level imo. There's no shame in that, and there's still room for him to improve even further. Starting this postseason.

EnigmatiC wrote:

Deeeez Knicks wrote:

EnigmatiC wrote:Giannis can not be top 5 in MVP this year. That team was way too disappointing. People had them penciled in for 60 wins and battling Boston for the top seed before the season started and they didn't even crack 50 wins.

Yea, Brunson had a better season than Giannis and deserves the spot over him.

Agreed. MVP is not "best player award" which I think some people take it as.