RealGM

If it’s just for picks (with filler), sure

Randle + All picks for him

Yes

Fury wrote:If it’s just for picks (with filler), sure

Do you consider Randle as filler?

I love Mikal but I don't see where he fits with OG on the roster

Yah but only if the Nets are being rational.

Mitch + McBride + 1st rounder for Mikal. And I like McBride.

Stannis wrote:

Fury wrote:If it’s just for picks (with filler), sure

Do you consider Randle as filler?

Bogey is filler. Rojas and Sims too.

GONYK wrote:I love Mikal but I don't see where he fits with OG on the roster

Fits in perfectly at the 2 next to OG at the 3. Ragu goes bench..giving it a nice boost.

IHART
RANDLE
OG
MIKAL
Brunson

Fat Kat wrote:

Stannis wrote:

Fury wrote:If it’s just for picks (with filler), sure

Do you consider Randle as filler?

Bogey is filler. Rojas and Sims too.

Yep Boggy and a treasure trove of picks , more than most teams could offer. Nets need picks badly. Only thing stopping this would be EGO and PRIDE.

Bojan and picks for Bridges

Brunson/McBride
Bridges/Divocenzco
Anunoby/Hart
Randle/Precious
Mitch/Hartenstein

Who’s beating this team?

Mitch + Bogs + a warchest of picks could rival any offer…

Rose would have to smooth over relations with the Nets first like he did with the Raptors…

Yes, if he can be obtained at a reasonable cost. DDV and Deuce have been great this year but I don't love the idea of pairing Brunson with another small guard long-term. Mikal and a healthy OG would provide much more defensive versatility. My only issue with adding Mikal is that the team would still need another creator for the non-Brunson minutes unless Thibs develops his offense to be less dependent on on-ball creators or someone else becomes a better offensive initiator.

GONYK wrote:I love Mikal but I don't see where he fits with OG on the roster

He will fit in nicely when OG misses 20-25 games per season.

We need some insurance for OG and another guy who can play defense and knock down the 3.

RHODEY wrote:

Watch on YouTube

TL; Didn’t watch:

YouTuber with no sources gets clicks by reposting Bleacher Report “insider” with no sources who got clicks by speculating that New Jersey should trade Bridges to us.

Yes. He can cover the 40 games at SF that will be available due to various OG injuries

Yes

GONYK wrote:I love Mikal but I don't see where he fits with OG on the roster

og spends a lot of time on the ir

Fat Kat wrote:

Stannis wrote:

Fury wrote:If it’s just for picks (with filler), sure

Do you consider Randle as filler?

Bogey is filler. Rojas and Sims too.

Whi is Rojas?

EDit: Who is Rojas?

No! he's overrated