If Isiah is allowed to make another trade...

Bill Bradley · Post #1 » by **Bill Bradley** » Fri Jan 4, 2008 1:02 am

...I'm boycotting the Knicks altogether. I won't watch or go to another game until the Isiah era is over, and will stop posting on this board.

Those of you proposing Artest trades are driving me nuts. The notion that Isiah should be allowed to make another desparation move that will involve getting rid of youth, only improve us enough to ruin our pick, and instill unrealistic hope in homeristic fans is just too much for me to take.

No more trades until the Isiah era is over!

Post #2 » by **moocow007** » Fri Jan 4, 2008 1:18 am

Bill Bradley wrote:I'm boycotting the Knicks altogether. I won't watch or go to another game until the Isiah era is over, and will stop posting on this board.

Those of you proposing Artest trades are driving me nuts. The notion that Isiah should be allowed to make another desparation move that will involve getting rid of youth, only improve us enough to ruin our pick, and instill unrealistic hope in homeristic fans is just too much for me to take.

No more trades until the Isiah era is over!

Ok if we fire Thomas can we then please, please trade for Artest?

StutterStep · Post #3 » by **StutterStep** » Fri Jan 4, 2008 1:20 am

Bye Bye Bill - you slowly became one of my favorite posters to read... but Dolan hates you (meaning fans) much more than he will ever hate Isiah.

Bill Bradley · Post #4 » by **Bill Bradley** » Fri Jan 4, 2008 1:32 am

moocow007 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Ok if we fire Thomas can we then please, please trade for Artest?

No!

Post #5 » by **moocow007** » Fri Jan 4, 2008 1:32 am

Bill Bradley wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

No!

Come on!!!

truth serum · Post #6 » by **truth serum** » Fri Jan 4, 2008 1:48 am

Ditto

nynixlive · Post #7 » by **nynixlive** » Fri Jan 4, 2008 1:53 am

I am 100% fine with trades. Stipulations:

Lee, Balkman, Nate should not be used and should be signed long term at reasonable amounts. If Nate or Balkman had to be used, that would be ok if it got other criteria met.

We cant trade draft picks. Period (exception is for ELITE caliber player that couldnt be passed up). Its burned us way too many times.

We should seek expiring contracts, where ever possible, for our larger contracts (Zach, Curry, Crawford). I would entertain keeping Crawford or Curry if it made sense.

Thats about it.

slamvangundy · Post #8 » by **slamvangundy** » Fri Jan 4, 2008 3:23 am

nynixlive wrote:I am 100% fine with trades. Stipulations:

Lee, Balkman, Nate should not be used and should be signed long term at reasonable amounts. If Nate or Balkman had to be used, that would be ok if it got other criteria met.

We cant trade draft picks. Period (exception is for ELITE caliber player that couldnt be passed up). Its burned us way too many times.

We should seek expiring contracts, where ever possible, for our larger contracts (Zach, Curry, Crawford). I would entertain keeping Crawford or Curry if it made sense.

Thats about it.

That is like saying I am 100% fine with britney spears raising another child.

crack cocaine, whiskey and methamphetamines should not be used during pregnancy, and after child birth in reasonable amounts. If whiskey or meth had to be used it would be ok if it got other criteria met.

We should seek basic child safety, wherever possible, for her older children. I would entertain Britney homeschooling her children if it made sense.

Jord0111 · Post #9 » by **Jord0111** » Fri Jan 4, 2008 3:35 am

[quote="nynixlive"]I am 100% fine with trades. Stipulations:

Lee, Balkman, Nate should not be used and should be signed long term at reasonable amounts. If Nate or Balkman had to be used, that would be ok if it got other criteria met.

We cant trade draft picks. Period (exception is for ELITE caliber player that couldnt be passed up). Its burned us way too many times.

We should seek expiring contracts, where ever possible, for our larger contracts (Zach, Curry, Crawford). I would entertain keeping Crawford or Curry if it made sense.

Thats about it.[/quote]

You couldn't get a bag of golf balls for nate or Balkman and I don't even know if you could get that for them. They both have absolutely no value to any GM in the NBA.

Post #10 » by **Capn'O** » Fri Jan 4, 2008 3:38 am

Bill Bradley wrote:...I'm boycotting the Knicks altogether. I won't watch or go to another game until the Isiah era is over, and will stop posting on this board.

Those of you proposing Artest trades are driving me nuts. The notion that Isiah should be allowed to make another desparation move that will involve getting rid of youth, only improve us enough to ruin our pick, and instill unrealistic hope in homeristic fans is just too much for me to take.

No more trades until the Isiah era is over!

What about Beerworks??? I will so punch Isiah in the face if he does this before the 21st (the night of the next massacre).

Bill Bradley · Post #11 » by **Bill Bradley** » Fri Jan 4, 2008 4:18 am

Capn'O wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

What about Beerworks??? I will so punch Isiah in the face if he does this before the 21st (the night of the next massacre).

Ha, well, I will still meet up with you guys before the game and then just hang out at the bar

Post #12 » by **knicks742** » Fri Jan 4, 2008 4:19 am

Bill Bradley wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Ha, well, I will still meet up with you guys before the game and then just hang out at the bar

Wait a minute, either you have conviction to do this or STFU.

Bill Bradley · Post #13 » by **Bill Bradley** » Fri Jan 4, 2008 4:22 am

knicks742 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Wait a minute, either you have conviction to do this or STFU.

C'mon, I won't even watch the game on the TV's in the bar.

Post #14 » by **Capn'O** » Fri Jan 4, 2008 4:38 am

Bill Bradley wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Ha, well, I will still meet up with you guys before the game and then just hang out at the bar

Sweet. I probably won't go to the game either... but the Beerworks must go on!