ImageImageImageImage

Overarching 2024 goal, what should it be?

Moderators: UCF, Knightro, Howard Mass, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, SOUL, ChosenSavior

User avatar
Knightro
Forum Mod - Magic
Forum Mod - Magic
Posts: 23,088
And1: 24,859
Joined: Dec 18, 2010
Location: Orlando, FL
 

Re: Overarching 2024 goal, what should it be? 

Post#101 » by Knightro » Sat Jul 15, 2023 5:19 pm

eyriq wrote:Ah, gotcha. I thought you were talking about last season and couldn't connect the dots.

Keep a spot warm for me on your take, if we extend Cole or Fultz early I'm all aboard. If we start out the season with Black out of the rotation I'll be alarmed. If we early extend a guard and bench Black I'll be on high alert.


I’ll take it a step further than that.

Even if Black is in the rotation, but he’s playing as a backup wing, how beneficial is that to him or the Magic long-term anyway?
three3d
Junior
Posts: 412
And1: 72
Joined: Jun 18, 2012

Re: Overarching 2024 goal, what should it be? 

Post#102 » by three3d » Sat Jul 15, 2023 9:06 pm

Knightro wrote:
eyriq wrote:Ah, gotcha. I thought you were talking about last season and couldn't connect the dots.

Keep a spot warm for me on your take, if we extend Cole or Fultz early I'm all aboard. If we start out the season with Black out of the rotation I'll be alarmed. If we early extend a guard and bench Black I'll be on high alert.


I’ll take it a step further than that.

Even if Black is in the rotation, but he’s playing as a backup wing, how beneficial is that to him or the Magic long-term anyway?


Playing as a backup wing? How’s he going to play backup wing without a shot? Defense will sag off him doubling Paolo and/or Franz making it harder for them to score. Black honestly doesn’t have a clear position IMO.
User avatar
Knightro
Forum Mod - Magic
Forum Mod - Magic
Posts: 23,088
And1: 24,859
Joined: Dec 18, 2010
Location: Orlando, FL
 

Re: Overarching 2024 goal, what should it be? 

Post#103 » by Knightro » Sat Jul 15, 2023 9:16 pm

three3d wrote:Playing as a backup wing? How’s he going to play backup wing without a shot? Defense will sag off him doubling Paolo and/or Franz making it harder for them to score. Black honestly doesn’t have a clear position IMO.


His only position offensively is point guard.

And the Magic have two point guards already :(
Catledge
Starter
Posts: 2,362
And1: 834
Joined: Mar 04, 2003
     

Re: Overarching 2024 goal, what should it be? 

Post#104 » by Catledge » Sat Jul 15, 2023 10:13 pm

I think the most likely of the possible explanations that people don't like is that Black is a wing and Howard is a combo forward.

By this logic, both have clear paths to playing time: Black has to outplay Harris, and Howard has to have a pulse when Isaac gets hurt.

To anticipate a point that has been made upthread: Lots and lots of rookie wings can't shoot. It's incredibly common and is part of what makes them projects.
pepe1991
RealGM
Posts: 20,391
And1: 16,408
Joined: Jan 10, 2016
   

Re: Overarching 2024 goal, what should it be? 

Post#105 » by pepe1991 » Sun Jul 16, 2023 6:56 am

Catledge wrote:I think the most likely of the possible explanations that people don't like is that Black is a wing and Howard is a combo forward.

By this logic, both have clear paths to playing time: Black has to outplay Harris, and Howard has to have a pulse when Isaac gets hurt.

To anticipate a point that has been made upthread: Lots and lots of rookie wings can't shoot. It's incredibly common and is part of what makes them projects.


There is no objective adventage for Black at SF position. No jumpshot, average size, average height, average first step.

His only adventage in basketball is his size at PG.


Jett has Ingles ahead of him. As well as Houstan and Okeke as competition
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon
User avatar
drsd
RealGM
Posts: 36,856
And1: 8,042
Joined: Mar 16, 2003
     

Re: Overarching 2024 goal, what should it be? 

Post#106 » by drsd » Sun Jul 16, 2023 7:13 am

pepe1991 wrote:
Catledge wrote:I think the most likely of the possible explanations that people don't like is that Black is a wing and Howard is a combo forward.

By this logic, both have clear paths to playing time: Black has to outplay Harris, and Howard has to have a pulse when Isaac gets hurt.

To anticipate a point that has been made upthread: Lots and lots of rookie wings can't shoot. It's incredibly common and is part of what makes them projects.


There is no objective adventage for Black at SF position. No jumpshot, average size, average height, average first step.

His only adventage in basketball is his size at PG.


Jett has Ingles ahead of him. As well as Houstan and Okeke as competition


And-1

I do think Coach Mosley will do some pre-season work of Anthony/Suggs/Black on the court together, but those gimmicks are not rotational minutes for players.
User avatar
eyriq
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,558
And1: 6,585
Joined: Mar 25, 2008
Location: #TheLab
Contact:
 

Re: Overarching 2024 goal, what should it be? 

Post#107 » by eyriq » Sun Jul 16, 2023 1:35 pm

I love the nuance between having a goal to improve vs having a goal to make the playoffs.

Also cool is that we were that last team to be eliminated from the play-in.

Lots to build on. Ingles is the perfect vet to bring in for leadership, and his on-court role is a perfect fit for our rotation.

Contract years for pretty much all our guards except for the lotto studs we've drafted during the rebuild. Could see some elevated play in the backcourt.

Curious how the dynamic between Paolo and Franz matures, especially after they compete in the world cup.

And of course there is the wildcard of Isaac.

We are due an injury free season, and if the stars align I think we are a top 5 defense.
mattdelray1220
Sophomore
Posts: 227
And1: 94
Joined: Jul 30, 2021
 

Re: Overarching 2024 goal, what should it be? 

Post#108 » by mattdelray1220 » Sun Jul 16, 2023 1:59 pm

eyriq wrote:I love the nuance between having a goal to improve vs having a goal to make the playoffs.

Also cool is that we were that last team to be eliminated from the play-in.

Lots to build on. Ingles is the perfect vet to bring in for leadership, and his on-court role is a perfect fit for our rotation.

Contract years for pretty much all our guards except for the lotto studs we've drafted during the rebuild. Could see some elevated play in the backcourt.

Curious how the dynamic between Paolo and Franz matures, especially after they compete in the world cup.

And of course there is the wildcard of Isaac.

We are due an injury free season, and if the stars align I think we are a top 5 defense.


It is an exciting time to be a Magic fan. It has been a long time. Love the Ingles signing. More competition breeds better play. It does seem like consolidation is coming or maybe this is the squad and they perform well where we do not need it... One possibility that nobody is discussing when talking about consolidation is using Black as a trade piece. I know our FO has not done that to date but if Fultz clearly becomes that guy and Suggs is not cutting at at SG we may be in a position to upgrade the SG posiition using Black as a big trade piece.
Catledge
Starter
Posts: 2,362
And1: 834
Joined: Mar 04, 2003
     

Re: Overarching 2024 goal, what should it be? 

Post#109 » by Catledge » Sun Jul 16, 2023 2:05 pm

pepe1991 wrote:
Catledge wrote:I think the most likely of the possible explanations that people don't like is that Black is a wing and Howard is a combo forward.

By this logic, both have clear paths to playing time: Black has to outplay Harris, and Howard has to have a pulse when Isaac gets hurt.

To anticipate a point that has been made upthread: Lots and lots of rookie wings can't shoot. It's incredibly common and is part of what makes them projects.


There is no objective adventage for Black at SF position. No jumpshot, average size, average height, average first step.

His only adventage in basketball is his size at PG.


This is kind of another way of saying that he has the build and athleticism of a wing, isn't it? I mean, there is a reason why very few players with his size become fulltime PGs, and Black doesn't seem to have the kind of elite ball handling that is typically required of big lead guards.

Off the top of my head, the only two lead guards in the league with Black's size are Harden and Luka. If Black turns out to have that level of ball handling and passing without the jump shot, then he is a PG, but that seems pretty unlikely to me at this stage.

As to Jett's path to playing time as a forward, Houstan and Okeke aren't really penciled into the nine-man rotation, and not having to unseat an established player seems consistent with having a path to playing time. Isaac and Ingles are both likely to be on minutes restrictions and to be held out of back-to-backs, and that's when both are nominally healthy, which seems unlikely to be the norm.
RichCollab
Starter
Posts: 2,329
And1: 724
Joined: Oct 23, 2019
         

Re: Overarching 2024 goal, what should it be? 

Post#110 » by RichCollab » Sun Jul 16, 2023 2:56 pm

I agree Jett has an easier path to playing time. Black at best day 1 is an upgrade to defense at the PG?
User avatar
fendilim
RealGM
Posts: 30,805
And1: 5,050
Joined: Jun 11, 2002
Location: 孫悟空, 时间太?!

Re: Overarching 2024 goal, what should it be? 

Post#111 » by fendilim » Sun Jul 16, 2023 4:27 pm

RichCollab wrote:I agree Jett has an easier path to playing time. Black at best day 1 is an upgrade to defense at the PG?

Considering Black’s size, I’d be shocked if he is limited to only PG play. I think he’ll get consistent minutes from PG to SF position.

Minutes shouldn’t be a problem for both Howard and Black.

We also run positionless basketball, so penciling him as only able to play the PG spot is limiting his capability.


Playing him at different positions also gives us the flexibility and size advantage to play 3-guard lineups. A trend in the modern nba.
Image
RichCollab
Starter
Posts: 2,329
And1: 724
Joined: Oct 23, 2019
         

Re: Overarching 2024 goal, what should it be? 

Post#112 » by RichCollab » Sun Jul 16, 2023 4:34 pm

fendilim wrote:
RichCollab wrote:I agree Jett has an easier path to playing time. Black at best day 1 is an upgrade to defense at the PG?

Considering Black’s size, I’d be shocked if he is limited to only PG play. I think he’ll get consistent minutes from PG to SF position.

Minutes shouldn’t be a problem for both Howard and Black.

We also run positionless basketball, so penciling him as only able to play the PG spot is limiting his capability.



I hope he doesn’t play SG or SF. He doesn’t have a shot? He will be a negative on the floor with either Paolo or Franz. Him playing SG/SF for Magic makes absolutely 0 sense.
OrlChamps2030
General Manager
Posts: 7,786
And1: 4,186
Joined: Jul 18, 2009
     

Re: Overarching 2024 goal, what should it be? 

Post#113 » by OrlChamps2030 » Sun Jul 16, 2023 4:37 pm

pepe1991 wrote:
Catledge wrote:I think the most likely of the possible explanations that people don't like is that Black is a wing and Howard is a combo forward.

By this logic, both have clear paths to playing time: Black has to outplay Harris, and Howard has to have a pulse when Isaac gets hurt.

To anticipate a point that has been made upthread: Lots and lots of rookie wings can't shoot. It's incredibly common and is part of what makes them projects.


There is no objective adventage for Black at SF position. No jumpshot, average size, average height, average first step.

His only adventage in basketball is his size at PG.


Jett has Ingles ahead of him. As well as Houstan and Okeke as competition


Yeah I’ve been thinking about Black playing on the wing and I don’t really see how it works if he doesn’t have a jump shot.
User avatar
fendilim
RealGM
Posts: 30,805
And1: 5,050
Joined: Jun 11, 2002
Location: 孫悟空, 时间太?!

Re: Overarching 2024 goal, what should it be? 

Post#114 » by fendilim » Sun Jul 16, 2023 4:37 pm

RichCollab wrote:
fendilim wrote:
RichCollab wrote:I agree Jett has an easier path to playing time. Black at best day 1 is an upgrade to defense at the PG?

Considering Black’s size, I’d be shocked if he is limited to only PG play. I think he’ll get consistent minutes from PG to SF position.

Minutes shouldn’t be a problem for both Howard and Black.

We also run positionless basketball, so penciling him as only able to play the PG spot is limiting his capability.



I hope he doesn’t play SG or SF. He doesn’t have a shot? He will be a negative on the floor with either Paolo or Franz. Him playing SG/SF for Magic makes absolutely 0 sense.

Did that stop us from playing Fultz with Paolo or Franz?
Image
RichCollab
Starter
Posts: 2,329
And1: 724
Joined: Oct 23, 2019
         

Re: Overarching 2024 goal, what should it be? 

Post#115 » by RichCollab » Sun Jul 16, 2023 4:40 pm

fendilim wrote:
RichCollab wrote:
fendilim wrote:Considering Black’s size, I’d be shocked if he is limited to only PG play. I think he’ll get consistent minutes from PG to SF position.

Minutes shouldn’t be a problem for both Howard and Black.

We also run positionless basketball, so penciling him as only able to play the PG spot is limiting his capability.



I hope he doesn’t play SG or SF. He doesn’t have a shot? He will be a negative on the floor with either Paolo or Franz. Him playing SG/SF for Magic makes absolutely 0 sense.

Did that stop us from playing Fultz with Paolo or Franz?


Fultz at PG and not SF/SG. Also, I don’t think we want to replicate what we did with Fultz to another position.
User avatar
fendilim
RealGM
Posts: 30,805
And1: 5,050
Joined: Jun 11, 2002
Location: 孫悟空, 时间太?!

Re: Overarching 2024 goal, what should it be? 

Post#116 » by fendilim » Sun Jul 16, 2023 4:48 pm

RichCollab wrote:
fendilim wrote:
RichCollab wrote:

I hope he doesn’t play SG or SF. He doesn’t have a shot? He will be a negative on the floor with either Paolo or Franz. Him playing SG/SF for Magic makes absolutely 0 sense.

Did that stop us from playing Fultz with Paolo or Franz?


Fultz at PG and not SF/SG. Also, I don’t think we want to replicate what we did with Fultz to another position.


A 3 man combination of Fultz/Suggs/Cole played AT LEAST
64 minutes last season.

Considering that Fultz is the tallest among the 3… i’m sorry but we did “technically” play Fultz at SF.

Our 4th, 10th, 11th, 12th and 19th out of the 20 most used lineup have a combination of at least 3 guards (among Cole/Suggs/Fultz/Ross/Harris

So we can replace Fultz with Black.

Black, Cole and Suggs.
Image
pepe1991
RealGM
Posts: 20,391
And1: 16,408
Joined: Jan 10, 2016
   

Re: Overarching 2024 goal, what should it be? 

Post#117 » by pepe1991 » Sun Jul 16, 2023 5:17 pm

Catledge wrote:
pepe1991 wrote:
Catledge wrote:I think the most likely of the possible explanations that people don't like is that Black is a wing and Howard is a combo forward.

By this logic, both have clear paths to playing time: Black has to outplay Harris, and Howard has to have a pulse when Isaac gets hurt.

To anticipate a point that has been made upthread: Lots and lots of rookie wings can't shoot. It's incredibly common and is part of what makes them projects.


There is no objective adventage for Black at SF position. No jumpshot, average size, average height, average first step.

His only adventage in basketball is his size at PG.


This is kind of another way of saying that he has the build and athleticism of a wing, isn't it? I mean, there is a reason why very few players with his size become fulltime PGs, and Black doesn't seem to have the kind of elite ball handling that is typically required of big lead guards.

Off the top of my head, the only two lead guards in the league with Black's size are Harden and Luka. If Black turns out to have that level of ball handling and passing without the jump shot, then he is a PG, but that seems pretty unlikely to me at this stage.

As to Jett's path to playing time as a forward, Houstan and Okeke aren't really penciled into the nine-man rotation, and not having to unseat an established player seems consistent with having a path to playing time. Isaac and Ingles are both likely to be on minutes restrictions and to be held out of back-to-backs, and that's when both are nominally healthy, which seems unlikely to be the norm.


PG: Fultz / Cole
SG: Harris / Suggs
SF : Franz /Ingles
PF: Banchero / Isaac
C : Wendell /

i think that's 9 men active rotation.

If Isaac is broken ( again) than AB , OKeke, Jett, Houstan will fight it out for 9th man. But also 9th man is probably 12-18 mpg low usage player.

Under current roster construction and some playoff aspirations ( and players who almost all are in contract years) to me, active roster is pretty much set, if there is no injuries going into a season. Things can change over time, and probably will but for time being i really struggle to see Jett in active rotation and i see AB as fringe man in rotation,



And to touch on Knightros & MM "Free throws " being difference between Fultz and AB, i would not bank on that claim just yet. After 3 SL game , Black went to ft line 3,6 times a game. That's not bad, but he isn't some knockdown FT shooter either. 70% in ncaa, 6-11 in SL.

Especially because i just don't see how he will break down defense on regular bases and get at rim other than bulldogging through defender. That strategy was something we thought Suggs will be able to do ( as waaaaaaaaay better athlete, quicker, faster, with bigger bounce etc) but it simply doesn't work for him due rather limited ability to suprise defense with jumpshots, floaters, mediocre ballhandling skills and rather poor decision making.

Black is probably smarter player than Suggs, but also worst athlete.


Right now people are simply fooling themslefs if they think Black is any scoring treat in any way, fashion nor form but going at rim. I also don't think he is some epic playmaker that some people delude themselfs into thinking. I think he is similar prospect to Scottie Barnes, in sense that he will look great if team around him actually decides to play to his strenghts ( that probably won't help team win games any time soon, like it was case with rookie season of Barnes) but also he will look very mediocre if team decides to drift from defering to him ( Scottie Barnes second year).
In modern basketball if you aren't cutter ,aren't elite playmaker, aren't elite scorer, you simply aren't starting level player. Especially not PG nor SF.

At the end of a day, Black on Magic makes no sense. We can talk to oblivion how potential trades will solve it, but until they happend, it stands, Anthony Black, as 6th pick, makes no sense on Orlando Magic. He is just arhytype of less potent scoring Jalen Suggs who just happends to be bit taller. That's pretty much it.


I'm also fed up with "almost made playin " talk. Like it's some grand achivment. you litearlly need to be better than 4 out of 14 teams to get there. And among those 4, at least 3 don't even try.
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon
Catledge
Starter
Posts: 2,362
And1: 834
Joined: Mar 04, 2003
     

Re: Overarching 2024 goal, what should it be? 

Post#118 » by Catledge » Sun Jul 16, 2023 7:08 pm

pepe1991 wrote:
Catledge wrote:
pepe1991 wrote:
There is no objective adventage for Black at SF position. No jumpshot, average size, average height, average first step.

His only adventage in basketball is his size at PG.


This is kind of another way of saying that he has the build and athleticism of a wing, isn't it? I mean, there is a reason why very few players with his size become fulltime PGs, and Black doesn't seem to have the kind of elite ball handling that is typically required of big lead guards.

Off the top of my head, the only two lead guards in the league with Black's size are Harden and Luka. If Black turns out to have that level of ball handling and passing without the jump shot, then he is a PG, but that seems pretty unlikely to me at this stage.

As to Jett's path to playing time as a forward, Houstan and Okeke aren't really penciled into the nine-man rotation, and not having to unseat an established player seems consistent with having a path to playing time. Isaac and Ingles are both likely to be on minutes restrictions and to be held out of back-to-backs, and that's when both are nominally healthy, which seems unlikely to be the norm.


PG: Fultz / Cole
SG: Harris / Suggs
SF : Franz /Ingles
PF: Banchero / Isaac
C : Wendell /

i think that's 9 men active rotation.

If Isaac is broken ( again) than AB , OKeke, Jett, Houstan will fight it out for 9th man. But also 9th man is probably 12-18 mpg low usage player.

Under current roster construction and some playoff aspirations ( and players who almost all are in contract years) to me, active roster is pretty much set, if there is no injuries going into a season. Things can change over time, and probably will but for time being i really struggle to see Jett in active rotation and i see AB as fringe man in rotation,



And to touch on Knightros & MM "Free throws " being difference between Fultz and AB, i would not bank on that claim just yet. After 3 SL game , Black went to ft line 3,6 times a game. That's not bad, but he isn't some knockdown FT shooter either. 70% in ncaa, 6-11 in SL.

Especially because i just don't see how he will break down defense on regular bases and get at rim other than bulldogging through defender. That strategy was something we thought Suggs will be able to do ( as waaaaaaaaay better athlete, quicker, faster, with bigger bounce etc) but it simply doesn't work for him due rather limited ability to suprise defense with jumpshots, floaters, mediocre ballhandling skills and rather poor decision making.

Black is probably smarter player than Suggs, but also worst athlete.


Right now people are simply fooling themslefs if they think Black is any scoring treat in any way, fashion nor form but going at rim. I also don't think he is some epic playmaker that some people delude themselfs into thinking. I think he is similar prospect to Scottie Barnes, in sense that he will look great if team around him actually decides to play to his strenghts ( that probably won't help team win games any time soon, like it was case with rookie season of Barnes) but also he will look very mediocre if team decides to drift from defering to him ( Scottie Barnes second year).
In modern basketball if you aren't cutter ,aren't elite playmaker, aren't elite scorer, you simply aren't starting level player. Especially not PG nor SF.

At the end of a day, Black on Magic makes no sense. We can talk to oblivion how potential trades will solve it, but until they happend, it stands, Anthony Black, as 6th pick, makes no sense on Orlando Magic. He is just arhytype of less potent scoring Jalen Suggs who just happends to be bit taller. That's pretty much it.


I'm also fed up with "almost made playin " talk. Like it's some grand achivment. you litearlly need to be better than 4 out of 14 teams to get there. And among those 4, at least 3 don't even try.


I see Black as basically a project wing for the reasons that you describe above.

I understand that this doesn't solve the Fultz situation, but wanting to solve the Fultz situation won't turn Black into a pg.
Bensational
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,363
And1: 12,572
Joined: Apr 10, 2001
     

Re: Overarching 2024 goal, what should it be? 

Post#119 » by Bensational » Sun Jul 16, 2023 10:25 pm

I see Black this way:

Physically he has the size to defend 1-3 and some 4.

Offensively he has point guard/facilitation skills, and he is a reluctant scorer who’s shooting is a project.

He’s essentially our version of Draymond/Simmons/Iggy/Dyson Daniels/etc. Put them in whatever position you want and call them what you want, the way they best help on offense is passing and playmaking.

I love Black and his archetype, but his game isn’t the easiest fit to imagine with Paolo.
User avatar
Knightro
Forum Mod - Magic
Forum Mod - Magic
Posts: 23,088
And1: 24,859
Joined: Dec 18, 2010
Location: Orlando, FL
 

Re: Overarching 2024 goal, what should it be? 

Post#120 » by Knightro » Sun Jul 16, 2023 10:48 pm

fendilim wrote:We also run positionless basketball, so penciling him as only able to play the PG spot is limiting his capability.


This isn’t really a thing. At least not offensively.

This whole concept of “positionless” basketball applies more defensively with switching becoming so much more prevalent.

But offensively you still have primary ball handlers, you still have catch and shoot floor spacers, you still have guys involved as the primary screeners, etc.

I think Black is versatile defensively in the sense that he can defend multiple positions. But offensively I don’t really see him as much other than an on-ball player because on the ball is where his shooting weaknesses is not as pronounced IMO.

Stick him off the ball in the corner and it’s gonna be a lot of 4 on 5 until he proves he can take and will make threes.

Return to Orlando Magic