RealGM

pepe1991 wrote:

RookieStar wrote:

pepe1991 wrote:
Im here, i can't post during games due streaming pop windows being to annoying to close

This is one of largest playoff victorires (points margins) in NBA history

Where do you watch the full game replays? Or do you VHS it? ( only OG gets this )

For this game in particular i went to sleep, woke up, watched it on live stream, and went back to sleep. That's why i don't post much or anything during games in general

If game is on tv, i can watch replay. Most playoff games are, at least not in first round of playoffs. Second, third and finals will have it all.

Full game replays , especially for games that just ended - in HD, - Fishker. Enjoy

thelead wrote:

MagicMatic wrote:

thelead wrote:So… I wasn’t watching the game with an analytic eye… did Suggs guard Mitchell for most of the game like I think he did? I know his primary assignment was Garland the first 2 games.

Yeah he was switched to him for most of this game compared to Garland the first two. The result was 1-6 from 3 and 6-16

Yeah, I thought so. Not sure why Mosley didn’t put the league’s best guard defender on Mitchell from the start of the series but I like the adjustment.

MIPQ wrote:just finished the game, all I can say is

LETS GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO MAGIC

drsd wrote:Box score thoughts:

The Magic CRUSHED FG% differential in this beautiful win.

Two non-shooting stats were cleaned up: rebounding differential, and TO differential.
Orlando dominated both offensive rebounding differential (+9) and offensive rebounding differential (+10).
Rebounding differential was a shocking +19. TO differential was minus-6. That's 25 friggen extra possessions and how playoff games are won!

So: even though the Magic was +12.1% in FG percentage, the Magic ended up with 10 extra FG attempts.

Orlando's defense on the three ball was again excellent (23.5% for Cavs this game), to the point that the Magic's own 35.1% looks like a gem. Orlando made 5 more three balls than the Cavs did here.

ChosenSavior wrote:Cavs still haven't posted 100+ in this series. Defense has not been an issue for us.

msmoore66 wrote:

Ducklett wrote:Suggs had a sneaky good statline: 24 points, 4 rebounds, 3 assists, 2 steals and a block. God damn.

And on only 11 shots!

jezzerinho wrote:Wow. Just wow.

Paolo last night was unplayable. In the third, he went on a tear that crushed Cleveland souls in its wake. With Paolo its all mental - if he can get it going early he's amazing at keeping us up on the scoreboard.

I found it fascinating how we picked on Mobley so much. Our bigs drove into his body, our guards picked on him on the perimeter. We obviously saw something there that we liked and it sure worked. We stayed out of Allen's way so his influence was fairly marginal i thought.

Garland wasn't just murdered, Suggs dug up his corpse and killed him again, then nabbed his ghost and strangled him too.

Fun times.

Black and Blue wrote:Had to miss the game yesterday due to some extremely unfortunate family news. Happy we won. Definitely needed some positivity and reading this thread helped greatly. Thank you guys.

msmoore66 wrote:

eyriq wrote:Crazy the JI at center experiment failed

Read on Twitter

?t=a-q7zbuvSYa3oTjV_myuYQ&s=19

I think there is a lot of context to it. Probably should have changed after the first game to be honest. Our 2nd unit suffered from him not being it.

I think it could be tested again vs a different opponent.