ImageImageImage

Hoopsworld draft do-over - huh?

Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Foshan, sixers hoops, Sixerscan

steveb21
Pro Prospect
Posts: 907
And1: 123
Joined: Nov 07, 2007
     

Hoopsworld draft do-over - huh? 

Post#1 » by steveb21 » Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:14 pm

Philadelphia
User avatar
barkley34
Veteran
Posts: 2,945
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 28, 2003
Location: Washington Township, NJ

 

Post#2 » by barkley34 » Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:17 pm

"Thaddeus Young has been a disappointment so far."

Has this guy even watched a Sixers game this year? :lol:
dbodner
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,474
And1: 536
Joined: Feb 18, 2002
Location: Philadelphia
Contact:

 

Post#3 » by dbodner » Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:21 pm

Thad's stats just aren't impressive enough to prevent these uninformed comments from people who haven't seen very much of him. As his playing time continues to increase, his value around the league will too.
twitter.com/DerekBodnerNBA :: Senior writer, The Athletic Philadelphia
User avatar
CPops57
RealGM
Posts: 15,341
And1: 1
Joined: Sep 04, 2001
Location: NYC

 

Post#4 » by CPops57 » Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:22 pm

from the article wrote:Based on current stats almost halfway through the season these selections seem obvious,


Seems like the guy did it just by ranking raw stats and not taking into account too many other variables.
The Sixer Fixer
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,821
And1: 60
Joined: Jan 09, 2007
       

Re: Hoopsworld draft do-over - huh? 

Post#5 » by The Sixer Fixer » Thu Jan 17, 2008 7:00 pm

steveb21 wrote:Anyone else think this guy is a little off? The only thing he's got right is that anyone could be successful with the squad Boston has. Thad may have started slow but he's been far from a dissapointment. Maybe he should redo this draft in a years or so...


Hoopsword has some of the worst writers. There was a guy last year Libero Smith (sp?), or something like that, who covered the Sixers. Every article he worte was filled with incorrect information or just stupid analysis. I posted a topic for a few of his dumb articles. I remember one where he ripped King over the fact that he didn't resign Joe Smith and we had all this cap room to do it. The guy was completely misinformed about what direction the team was going it. He obviously thought they were trying to win now vs. rebuild. Anyhow, not sure if this was written by the same guy, but I don't expect the other writers to be much better.

As far as the pick thing. Why would you debate us taking Glen Davis over Thad. Why not at least debate us picking Smith over Davis. Or better yet, debate us not keeping the 30th pick and using that on Davis. How you going to argue that Davis was worth pick 12? Maybe I'm missing something from this. Also, Davis has been incredible? Really?...I wonder what is being used to determine that since he barely plays.
ankle420breaker
General Manager
Posts: 8,949
And1: 1,991
Joined: Sep 21, 2005
Location: South Jersey

 

Post#6 » by ankle420breaker » Thu Jan 17, 2008 7:06 pm

Mark my words, that writer will be embarrassed come this this time next year.
The Sixer Fixer
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,821
And1: 60
Joined: Jan 09, 2007
       

 

Post#7 » by The Sixer Fixer » Thu Jan 17, 2008 7:07 pm

ankle420breaker wrote:Mark my words, that writer will be embarrassed come this this time next year.


I'd say come this time 2 months from now.
SendEm
Banned User
Posts: 2,285
And1: 1
Joined: Dec 13, 2007

 

Post#8 » by SendEm » Thu Jan 17, 2008 7:07 pm

I liked Davis going into the draft and believed that he was a sure fire pro, but the POTENTIAL of what Thad can offer as a pro and even the potential of Jason Smith far outweigh Glen Davis who will be a solid bonafide pro while Jason Smith could ultimately end up as a bust. Thad doesn't look like a bust and he is a SF that believes in getting easy buckets around the Hoop so that somewhat offsets the fact that Davis is a PF, a position that is of greater importance than a SF...

I don't like how Jason Smith has obviously lost confidence since the start of the season, he is timid on the court now.
User avatar
IggyTheBEaST
RealGM
Posts: 14,452
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 31, 2003

 

Post#9 » by IggyTheBEaST » Thu Jan 17, 2008 7:28 pm

The Sixer Fixer wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

I'd say come this time 2 months from now.


weeks
User avatar
LieCheatSteal
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,891
And1: 418
Joined: Nov 19, 2005
Location: Philadelphia via Toronto

 

Post#10 » by LieCheatSteal » Thu Jan 17, 2008 7:34 pm

Saw it. Pretty crappy article. Also, isn't it a little early to judge? You can do this article 3 years from now, not 3 months into professional play.
Two years from being two years away.
dbodner
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,474
And1: 536
Joined: Feb 18, 2002
Location: Philadelphia
Contact:

 

Post#11 » by dbodner » Thu Jan 17, 2008 8:07 pm

The Sixer Fixer wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I'd say come this time 2 months from now.


I'd say right now.
Ganon19
Banned User
Posts: 374
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 12, 2007

 

Post#12 » by Ganon19 » Thu Jan 17, 2008 8:15 pm

Glen is fat and likes to flop against guards who weigh half his size
Dedicated_76ers_fan
Banned User
Posts: 12,912
And1: 2
Joined: Sep 30, 2006

 

Post#13 » by Dedicated_76ers_fan » Thu Jan 17, 2008 8:18 pm

Sendem: Rookies have their walls, and Jason Smith's just not shooting well right now. I think a fast break dunk, or a wide open jumper will get him back into the mix...Or this will.

Reggie Evans DOES NOT deserve to start. His rebounding can be had off the bench. Giving the young kid a chance allows him to elevate his game. I've said it time and time again that Maurice Cheeks takes credit for the players hard work and no else. He's a horrible in-game coach.
The Guilty Party
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 17,697
And1: 8
Joined: Aug 26, 2002
Location: Zoo Jersey
 

 

Post#14 » by The Guilty Party » Thu Jan 17, 2008 8:26 pm

There's nothing to debate here. Hoopsworld seems to have a knack for allowing extremely bad "reporters", and I use that word loosely, to post ridiculous columns on their site.

If that column or any of the other ones The Sixer Fixer has referenced were posted as a thread here... that "reporter" would get ripped a knew a$$ho1e by most of us.

Can we as collective group agree that referencing Hoopsworld from this point on is a bad idea???
PhilasFinest
RealGM
Posts: 14,640
And1: 3,581
Joined: Mar 13, 2007
     

 

Post#15 » by PhilasFinest » Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:53 pm

The way Thad's played the past month...id say he is playing better than a majority of the players selected infront of him.
SparksFly87 wrote:Towns got boat feet and gets off the ground very slow with a lack of explosiveness . He is a rich mans Henry Sims to me. No thanks .
User avatar
Howardmgm3
Sophomore
Posts: 238
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 13, 2005
Location: Bethlehem, Pa.

 

Post#16 » by Howardmgm3 » Thu Jan 17, 2008 10:16 pm

As of today, the only players I would pick over Thad in a do over draft is Oden, Durant, Horford (PF stud) and maybe Yi (maybe not). I would certainly pick Thad over Brewer, Conley, Green, Law, Noah, Wright, Hawes, and oh yeah, Thornton.
Hussien Fatal
Veteran
Posts: 2,905
And1: 1,405
Joined: Jul 07, 2006
Location: N-E-W Jers where plenty murders occur

 

Post#17 » by Hussien Fatal » Thu Jan 17, 2008 10:24 pm

Howardmgm3 wrote:As of today, the only players I would pick over Thad in a do over draft is Oden, Durant, Horford (PF stud) and maybe Yi (maybe not). I would certainly pick Thad over Brewer, Conley, Green, Law, Noah, Wright, Hawes, and oh yeah, Thornton.



Good Post :clap:
They call me Hussien Fatal its a two game table im robbin you **** cradle wit a knife in your navel....
IglooKing2
Freshman
Posts: 83
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 25, 2007

 

Post#18 » by IglooKing2 » Thu Jan 17, 2008 10:27 pm

FWIW, I'd take Davis over Jason Smith right now. But Thad? I'm not so sure of that. And the "disappointment" comment shows that this guy's basing his analysis on box scores, particularly considering that Thad's only 19.
SouthJersey
Starter
Posts: 2,176
And1: 144
Joined: Dec 09, 2005

 

Post#19 » by SouthJersey » Thu Jan 17, 2008 10:27 pm

^I agree. Actually, if you you look at the mock draft before college bball started last year, thats about where Thad ranked.
User avatar
Wildfire
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,817
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 07, 2004

 

Post#20 » by Wildfire » Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:43 am

I think what a lot of people forget is that Thad was a top 5 pick going into college. He's always had great potential.

Return to Philadelphia 76ers