Page 1 of 142

Tom Moore 3.0

Posted: Wed Sep 9, 2009 2:35 pm
by The Guilty Party
Gsraider wrote:Now this move, I like a lot. I happen to agree with those who suggest that Carney often plays too fast and cannot harness his athleticism. I have also seen him play excellent defense from time to time and get really hot from distance. When you are filling out your roster with minimum type contracts, every player is going to have warts of some kind. If you can find a guy that can potentially give you something on any given night for this price, it's a good signing if you ask me. If he fails completely, you spent the minimum and he leaves next season. No harm, no foul.


Above is the last post from Moore 2.0.

Re: Tom Moore 3.0

Posted: Wed Sep 9, 2009 2:45 pm
by Dedicated_76ers_fan
Now, many have disagreed with me on a number of issues but this is one we'll all agree on: If Rodney Carney had handles.........MAN. What'd a sick player he'd be. He has some explosive hops and he's quick as well. And he's a good 3pt shooter. Handles would turn him from a role-player, to a starter.

It's not that he plays too fast, it's just he doesn't have handles and that's the fundamental thing expected of a 2 guard.

There's still hope, he was drafted 3 years ago(the same time as Kevin Kolb). He can still develop those handles. It's not like he's old or anything.

Re: Tom Moore 3.0

Posted: Wed Sep 9, 2009 3:00 pm
by SixersfutureGM
forgot about holiday, over the course of the season he will likely take mins from ivey and green as they should ease him into that role plus they are gonna try to get wins early because people wants to save their jobs. Not that we have a deep bench because we dont but the people on our bench are close to each other talent wise that it will be interesting to see who doesnt dress for games.

Re: Tom Moore 3.0

Posted: Wed Sep 9, 2009 3:32 pm
by ankle420breaker
Asked this in the other thread...

Does Carney instantly become our 2nd best 3 point shooter?

Re: Tom Moore 3.0

Posted: Wed Sep 9, 2009 4:24 pm
by tmoore
Questionable. He's capable of being that, but he has to cut down on 3s early in the clock.

Re: Tom Moore 3.0

Posted: Wed Sep 9, 2009 4:34 pm
by Gsraider
Dedicated_76ers_fan wrote:It's not that he plays too fast, it's just he doesn't have handles and that's the fundamental thing expected of a 2 guard.


I'm going to have to somewhat disagree here. I agree that Carney doesn't possess a good handle. However, I also think Carney has always played the game too fast and does not allow it to come to him. If Carney were to spend an entire off-season on improving his handle, I would be hopeful that good coaching could help him with his patience and understanding of the game. Right now though, the fact that he plays too fast only exacerbates his poor handle.

Sadly, that's why a talented athlete like this can be had for the league minimum.

Re: Tom Moore 3.0

Posted: Wed Sep 9, 2009 4:44 pm
by ankle420breaker
tmoore wrote:Questionable. He's capable of being that, but he has to cut down on 3s early in the clock.


True. He tries to do too much. Just learning some patience on the offensive end would really help his game.

Re: Tom Moore 3.0

Posted: Wed Sep 9, 2009 5:00 pm
by Dedicated_76ers_fan
Do you think coming to a team where he's familar with the guys and a spark off the bench would help him in those areas?

Re: Tom Moore 3.0

Posted: Wed Sep 9, 2009 5:03 pm
by Dedicated_76ers_fan
Via Twitter: Whole 2nd unit(And Thad/Lou) are working out. Great. Now, where's Sam I am. For all that talk about a fresh start. I hope he's working on his ball skills, not his computer tech skills.

If he wants to be a technician, retire from the NBA. That's 12 million off of our salary space. Right?

Re: Tom Moore 3.0

Posted: Wed Sep 9, 2009 7:50 pm
by tk76
Have read the last few pages, so maybe this has already been discussed...

Regarding Carney's game, I worry that he is the wrong fit for the Princeton. I think he could thrive off the ball in a role similar to Ariza on the Lakers last year. But he is the wrong guy to ask to make decisions in a 2 or 3 man game. I remember him not only as a subpar ball handler and playing "too fast", but also as a guy with a one tract mind. He decides what he wants to do (drive or shoot) but can't read and react based on the defense.

Maybe he has improved or maybe they can use him on the weakside and not ask him to do so much. I do like what he can bring as an energy, role player. I just worry if he is a square peg when it comes to the Princeton Offense.

of course, for just the minimum its a good signing either way.

Re: Tom Moore 3.0

Posted: Wed Sep 9, 2009 7:58 pm
by ankle420breaker
tk76 wrote:Have read the last few pages, so maybe this has already been discussed...

Regarding Carney's game, I worry that he is the wrong fit for the Princeton. I think he could thrive off the ball in a role similar to Ariza on the Lakers last year. But he is the wrong guy to ask to make decisions in a 2 or 3 man game. I remember him not only as a subpar ball handler and playing "too fast", but also as a guy with a one tract mind. He decides what he wants to do (drive or shoot) but can't read and react based on the defense.

Maybe he has improved or maybe they can use him on the weakside and not ask him to do so much. I do like what he can bring as an energy, role player. I just worry if he is a square peg when it comes to the Princeton Offense.

of course, for just the minimum its a good signing either way.


I agree that he's not the best guy when it comes to making decisions with the ball, and that part of the princeton doesn't suit him at all, but on the other side of things I think he could also benefit from a motion offense like this. He's good at cutting to the basket and he if we swing the ball around the perimeter he could get left open quite a bit from outside. I could see guys finding him for some high percentage looks... I just don't see him creating offense for himself or others. It'll be interesting to see how he fits in. It's another contract year for Rodney.

Re: Tom Moore 3.0

Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 1:10 am
by tmoore
Dedicated_76ers_fan wrote:Do you think coming to a team where he's familiar with the guys and a spark off the bench would help him in those areas?


Could be. Didn't see much of him during his season in Minnesota, so I'm not sure how different he is now than 15 months ago. It's no lock he'll be in the regular rotation, but he has a shot for at least some spot minutes.

Re: Tom Moore 3.0

Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 1:21 am
by Kevin12
I don't even see 8 minutes a game for Rod.

Re: Tom Moore 3.0

Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 1:14 pm
by tmoore
Kevin12 wrote:I don't even see 8 minutes a game for Rod.


That's certainly possible.

Re: Tom Moore 3.0

Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 3:49 pm
by tmoore
Could be that Holiday, Green, Ivey and Carney will have 30-35 minutes a night between them, depending on the matchups and pace of the game. Could also change depending how Williams plays.

Re: Tom Moore 3.0

Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 4:00 pm
by ankle420breaker
I am REALLY hoping to see a whole lot of DNP CD's next to Ivey's name this year.

Re: Tom Moore 3.0

Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 6:34 pm
by Kevin12
tmoore wrote:Could be that Holiday, Green, Ivey and Carney will have 30-35 minutes a night between them, depending on the matchups and pace of the game. Could also change depending how Williams plays.


Take out Carney and replace that with Kapono.

Re: Tom Moore 3.0

Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 7:02 pm
by sixerswillrule
I think he was just referring to PG and SG. Make it all 3 positions and add in Kapono, and it's about 45 minutes between those 5 backups.

Re: Tom Moore 3.0

Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 5:56 am
by tmoore
Kevin12 wrote:
tmoore wrote:Could be that Holiday, Green, Ivey and Carney will have 30-35 minutes a night between them, depending on the matchups and pace of the game. Could also change depending how Williams plays.


Take out Carney and replace that with Kapono.


Yes, was specifically referring to guard minutes. Would think Kapono is mainly a "3."

Re: Tom Moore 3.0

Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 3:11 pm
by ProcessDoctor
Why hasn't Sam Dalembert been traded yet? Wake me up when this happens. (Kaman for Daly, get it done!)