enigmatics wrote:I confirmed he was a TRADE PIECE not that him being held back to prevent injury was an undeniable fact.
You're fishing for an argument - go find it with someone else. Like really bro we are debating THIS? LOL
Ok, so...no? But now I'll argue a bit.
enigmatics wrote:The bench is being re-developed in-season as Bol is still getting worked into the rotation, O'Neal will need a bit of time to adjust, as will Little (now that he's not being held back for an impending trade), as will Damion Lee.
enigmatics wrote:He showed some signs earlier in the year then got lost from missing time due to the birth of his kid and then being sat because he was a potential trade piece.
These are two separate recent statements you've made on the subject. And in my opinion, to a reasonable reader, these are declarative statements that are not ONLY that he was in trade talks, but also that he was not playing because of it. That sounds to me like someone who seems to know something about it, so I asked out of genuine curiosity if there was something out there I hadnt heard about it. I would not characterize that as fishing for an argument.
If those statements really ONLY mean that he was in trade talks and Im totally making up the other part, then please accept my apologies. Im just not sure how many other ways you'd like a reader to interpret them.