ImageImage

[Game Thread] Portland @ Minnesota

Moderators: DeBlazerRiddem, The Sebastian Express, Moonbeam

User avatar
BlackMamba
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,297
And1: 81
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Location: Cd. de M
         

 

Post#21 » by BlackMamba » Wed Jan 2, 2008 9:57 pm

what happened to nate?


and i think that martell "fading" away has more to do with jones and outlaw making the big plays when the team most need them.

even though i think he will continue to be the starting SF unless he gets injured, he has to be more consistent.
User avatar
Pattycakes
General Manager
Posts: 7,719
And1: 1,520
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Contact:
     

 

Post#22 » by Pattycakes » Wed Jan 2, 2008 10:05 pm

Martell starting isn't hurting or helping anything. I can accept that if Jajo and TO are continually stepping up the rest of the season.
User avatar
breaker91
Starter
Posts: 2,125
And1: 1
Joined: Apr 07, 2007
Location: Portland, where meniscus tears happen

 

Post#23 » by breaker91 » Wed Jan 2, 2008 10:13 pm

mojomarc wrote:I'm hoping the Blazers blow them out and McBob gets 20 minutes/20 points because of it. I want the legend of McBob to grow and grow into a massive groundswell of McBob momentum. I want him to be so well-liked in Portland that 15 year old girls on school buses chant his name like he was a member of Menudo or N'Sync or whatever boy band is popular these days. We start winning big and mark my words--we'll enter a realm of McBob worship to match or exceed the short-lived "Dave Twardzik with a perm" whirlwind of 1979.

All hail McBob!!!


Maybe it is time to remove the Ha picture thread and replace it with a McBob image thread. :noway:
User avatar
mojomarc
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,811
And1: 966
Joined: Jun 01, 2004
Location: Funkytown

 

Post#24 » by mojomarc » Wed Jan 2, 2008 10:33 pm

breaker91 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Maybe it is time to remove the Ha picture thread and replace it with a McBob image thread. :noway:


NEVER!!!!! As magnificent as McBob is, he can't hold a candle to Jaws+Odd Job.
User avatar
Mr Odd
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,081
And1: 8
Joined: Jul 08, 2003

 

Post#25 » by Mr Odd » Wed Jan 2, 2008 11:22 pm

Milkdud wrote:If the blazers play there game I think we should get this one. I assume Nate will be back coaching? Personly I was not very happy with Deans sub patterns. :-?


Nate has always been pretty bad at how to
play and when to play his players (however
it has gotten better) but youre right, Dean
seems to have outdone Nate in that area.. .

But im not going to get down on Dean about
it since he was credited for the new zone d.. .
Image
bing'o-bang'o-bong'o-baby!!
User avatar
d-train
RealGM
Posts: 21,227
And1: 1,098
Joined: Mar 26, 2001
   

 

Post#26 » by d-train » Wed Jan 2, 2008 11:24 pm

This is the most winnable game in January but no road game is going to be easy. I think we need this win because the wins are going to be scarce for a while.
Image
User avatar
BlackMamba
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,297
And1: 81
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Location: Cd. de M
         

 

Post#27 » by BlackMamba » Wed Jan 2, 2008 11:24 pm

why all the commotion around mcbob?
User avatar
J~Rush
Head Coach
Posts: 6,997
And1: 28
Joined: Jul 27, 2007
Location: Portland

 

Post#28 » by J~Rush » Wed Jan 2, 2008 11:24 pm

Mr Odd wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Nate has always been pretty bad at how to
play and when to play his players (however
it has gotten better) but youre right, Dean
seems to have outdone Nate in that area.. .

But im not going to get down on Dean about
it since he was credited for the new zone d.. .


I honestly believe that about 2% of Dean's sentences start with "you know". After reading the article interview and hearing the postgame interview a couple nights ago.
e
User avatar
Milkdud
RealGM
Posts: 12,095
And1: 137
Joined: May 21, 2001
Location: Dreaming of Australia

 

Post#29 » by Milkdud » Wed Jan 2, 2008 11:35 pm

Mr Odd wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Nate has always been pretty bad at how to
play and when to play his players (however
it has gotten better) but youre right, Dean
seems to have outdone Nate in that area.. .

But im not going to get down on Dean about
it since he was credited for the new zone d.. .


I dont really wanna dump on Dean either, it was just kind of maddening to watch the Jazz just abuse the blazers on the glass over and over again. Im sure Dean knows more about basketball the I but it doesnt take a genius to see that having the front court combo of Frye/Outlaw out there was killing us late in the game.
User avatar
Mr Odd
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,081
And1: 8
Joined: Jul 08, 2003

 

Post#30 » by Mr Odd » Wed Jan 2, 2008 11:36 pm

You Know, You Know, You Know I like Dean.
BlackMamba wrote:why all the commotion around mcbob?

Because McJosh came in off the bench & hit back to back shots.
He even did a nice base line fade away like Ewing, lol.. .
Image
bing'o-bang'o-bong'o-baby!!
User avatar
Fitz303
General Manager
Posts: 8,181
And1: 1,822
Joined: Oct 18, 2006
Location: Portland

 

Post#31 » by Fitz303 » Wed Jan 2, 2008 11:39 pm

When was Demopoulos credited with the new zone? I just havent read that anywhere and when Henry Abbott asked him about it he said:

One of the things that's been reported on about your winning streak is that you've been seeing good results playing zone defense. First of all, can you describe what kind of zone you've been using?

Well, it's Nate's zone, really. We've been together seven years, and we've played a lot of different types of defenses. Nate played for Valvano, so Valvano used to junk it up and triangle-and-twos and stuff back in the '70s, and '80s. And Nate was a great weak side rebounder. He just understands good defense. It's more a hybrid of all the things that we've experienced, you know, along with [assistant coaches] Monty Williams, Luke [Maurice Lucas] and Bill Bayno, who, you know, played zone at UNLV.


But on the subject of coach D's sub pattern, it was awful. We certainly didnt deserve to win the game the way everyone played, but we were in it the whole time. Had Joel played around 30 minutes like he should have and Webster stayed out of the game in the 4th, we just might have pulled that one out
User avatar
Mr Odd
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,081
And1: 8
Joined: Jul 08, 2003

 

Post#32 » by Mr Odd » Wed Jan 2, 2008 11:40 pm

I think the Blazers will do well in this game.
I dont see them winning by big and if they
want to win theyre going to have to play
good. If they just show up & play just to
play then theyre not going to win the game.

Key for the Blazers to win this game.
*Score more then the Wolves.

Another Win Steak??
Image
bing'o-bang'o-bong'o-baby!!
User avatar
J~Rush
Head Coach
Posts: 6,997
And1: 28
Joined: Jul 27, 2007
Location: Portland

 

Post#33 » by J~Rush » Wed Jan 2, 2008 11:43 pm

Fitz303 wrote:When was Demopoulos credited with the new zone? I just havent read that anywhere and when Henry Abbott asked him about it he said:



I'm pretty sure Barrett and Rice have alluded to that a few times this year during games.
e
User avatar
Fitz303
General Manager
Posts: 8,181
And1: 1,822
Joined: Oct 18, 2006
Location: Portland

 

Post#34 » by Fitz303 » Wed Jan 2, 2008 11:45 pm

J~Rush wrote:
I'm pretty sure Barrett and Rice have alluded to that a few times this year during games.


Fair enough.. I just never heard it before.. It wouldnt suprise me.. We have a great group of assistants between him, monty, mo, and Bayno
User avatar
Milkdud
RealGM
Posts: 12,095
And1: 137
Joined: May 21, 2001
Location: Dreaming of Australia

 

Post#35 » by Milkdud » Wed Jan 2, 2008 11:49 pm

Mr Odd wrote:I think the Blazers will do well in this game.
I dont see them winning by big and if they
want to win theyre going to have to play
good. If they just show up & play just to
play then theyre not going to win the game.

Key for the Blazers to win this game.
*Score more then the Wolves.

Another Win Steak??


Im going with

"The team that scores more points in this game should be able to win it"
I could track down the direct quote by old Bill Walton but it went something like that.
User avatar
Mr Odd
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,081
And1: 8
Joined: Jul 08, 2003

 

Post#36 » by Mr Odd » Thu Jan 3, 2008 12:36 am

Fitz303 wrote:When was Demopoulos credited with the new zone? I just havent read that anywhere and when Henry Abbott asked him about it he said:

One of the things that's been reported on about your winning streak is that you've been seeing good results playing zone defense. First of all, can you describe what kind of zone you've been using?

Well, it's Nate's zone, really. We've been together seven years, and we've played a lot of different types of defenses. Nate played for Valvano, so Valvano used to junk it up and triangle-and-twos and stuff back in the '70s, and '80s. And Nate was a great weak side rebounder. He just understands good defense. It's more a hybrid of all the things that we've experienced, you know, along with [assistant coaches] Monty Williams, Luke [Maurice Lucas] and Bill Bayno, who, you know, played zone at UNLV.


But on the subject of coach D's sub pattern, it was awful. We certainly didnt deserve to win the game the way everyone played, but we were in it the whole time. Had Joel played around 30 minutes like he should have and Webster stayed out of the game in the 4th, we just might have pulled that one out


First time I heard Dean was the main guy behind it
was on the raido about 3 weeks ago from Quick.. .
I have no doubt in my mind Nate helped with it, but
from everything I have read & heard about Dean
fits what Quick said aswell as later when Mike & Mike
talked about it. Also Dean isnt going to take credit
for it, hes going to say it was a team effort, thats
what youre supose to say!! Hehe.. .but I guess it
doesnt really matter who was behind it, most
important thing is, its working for the most part!!
:clap:

Milkdud wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Im going with

"The team that scores more points in this game should be able to win it"
I could track down the direct quote by old Bill Walton but it went something like that.


Haha - I know, basketball isnt a hard thing to understand.
Simple - Outscore the other team!!
Image
bing'o-bang'o-bong'o-baby!!
User avatar
Mr Odd
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,081
And1: 8
Joined: Jul 08, 2003

 

Post#37 » by Mr Odd » Thu Jan 3, 2008 12:58 am

Im in the blazers chat room with someone
named "lol" and they havent typed anything.

This is creepy.. .
Image
bing'o-bang'o-bong'o-baby!!
TBpup
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,898
And1: 241
Joined: Jan 07, 2004
Location: Financial Planning office in L.O.
       

 

Post#38 » by TBpup » Thu Jan 3, 2008 1:00 am

Fitz303 wrote:
When was Demopoulos credited with the new zone? I just havent read that anywhere and when Henry Abbott asked him about it he said:


I'm pretty sure Barrett and Rice have alluded to that a few times this year during games.


Dean's zone comes from his experience under John Chaney at Temple and the matchup zone they ran there.

:starwars
@TBpup22
User avatar
b_roy7
Veteran
Posts: 2,908
And1: 0
Joined: May 11, 2007
Contact:

 

Post#39 » by b_roy7 » Thu Jan 3, 2008 1:02 am

Mr Odd wrote:Im in the blazers chat room with someone
named "lol" and they havent typed anything.

This is creepy.. .
Don't worry, I got your back.

You would think. :wink: I was "lmfao".

I'm calling a new streak, don't critisize me!
User avatar
Mr Odd
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,081
And1: 8
Joined: Jul 08, 2003

 

Post#40 » by Mr Odd » Thu Jan 3, 2008 1:06 am

b_roy7 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Don't worry, I got your back.

You would think. :wink: I was "lmfao".

I'm calling a new streak, don't critisize me!


CRAP, Theres "lol" and "lmfao"!!

AHH THE NIGHTMARE!!
Image
bing'o-bang'o-bong'o-baby!!

Return to Portland Trail Blazers