RealGM

JMAC3 wrote:

OriAr wrote:

BAMAFREAK wrote:Would 100% challenge for the 1st overall pick in this years draft(his original class)

Could have very well been a unanimous #1 pick by now if he didn't reclassify.

Do you think GG Jackson is a future All-star?

He certainly has the talent.
Question is whether he puts it all together over a season or more.

OriAr wrote:

JMAC3 wrote:

OriAr wrote:Could have very well been a unanimous #1 pick by now if he didn't reclassify.

Do you think GG Jackson is a future All-star?

He certainly has the talent.
Question is whether he puts it all together over a season or more.

All I know about GG is this, he looked damn good in the Kings game last night. Damn good.

?s=20

Quickly shaping up to be the steal of the draft.
He'll be the biggest steal since Jalen Brunson if he can put it together over multiple years.

?s=20

Let’s go!

is it still too early to say he should've gone hire? or no?

?s=46&t=q0Zbv7QUrzRY6VJruFoDsg

clyde21 wrote:is it still too early to say he should've gone hire? or no?

Not at all. But a lot of us thought he should’ve went higher on draft night. Yes he had some maturity issues but you don’t find movement skills and offensive bags on guys his size often.
Plus, he was supposed to be a senior in high school but instead was trying to carry an SEC team.
I just watched him be able to score at 3 levels and was pretty certain he would translate once his role was more defined and he was in a structured program

BAMAFREAK wrote:

clyde21 wrote:is it still too early to say he should've gone hire? or no?

Not at all. But a lot of us thought he should’ve went higher on draft night. Yes he had some maturity issues but you don’t find movement skills and offensive bags on guys his size often.
Plus, he was supposed to be a senior in high school but instead was trying to carry an SEC team.
I just watched him be able to score at 3 levels and was pretty certain he would translate once his role was more defined and he was in a structured program

i was being sarcastic given some of the responses that were in this thread earlier

clyde21 wrote:

BAMAFREAK wrote:

clyde21 wrote:is it still too early to say he should've gone hire? or no?

Not at all. But a lot of us thought he should’ve went higher on draft night. Yes he had some maturity issues but you don’t find movement skills and offensive bags on guys his size often.
Plus, he was supposed to be a senior in high school but instead was trying to carry an SEC team.
I just watched him be able to score at 3 levels and was pretty certain he would translate once his role was more defined and he was in a structured program

i was being sarcastic given some of the responses that were in this thread earlier

Yeah I'm doing my best not to @ the posters who were making statements discounting GG without watching him play more than National TV games and looking at box scores.

Another high level game from GG against a Lakers team fighting for playoff seeding.

QMemphis wrote:Another high level game from GG against a Lakers team fighting for playoff seeding.

How does he get 1 rebound?

CoachinCarolina wrote:

QMemphis wrote:Another high level game from GG against a Lakers team fighting for playoff seeding.

How does he get 1 rebound?

Bro, let it go.

GG started 17 games for the Grizzlies and averaged 18/5 with 35% on 3PAs as a starter.

Turns 20 years old in 8 months. Shot 46% on corner 3s. Obviously needs to add more to overall game but nice upside for a #45 selection. Just shows GMs overthink things. Any team short on talent that didn't pursue this low risk/high reward at all should be fired.

There’s zero doubt in my mind he goes 1:1 in this draft he hadn’t reclassified

Today was his career high 44. First half he helped the team go toe to toe with the defending champs who were fighting for seeding.