Pacers Pick Tracking (Update: #19 officially)

raps95 · Post #1561 » by **raps95** » Mon Apr 22, 2024 9:46 pm

Son of a …..

WuTang_OG · Post #1562 » by **WuTang_OG** » Mon Apr 22, 2024 9:47 pm

Read on Twitter

AbC? · Post #1563 » by **AbC?** » Mon Apr 22, 2024 9:48 pm

Feels right. When the process is poor, luck tends to work against you.

Post #1564 » by **DG88** » Mon Apr 22, 2024 9:48 pm

Well damn

LoveMyRaps · Post #1565 » by **LoveMyRaps** » Mon Apr 22, 2024 9:52 pm

LMAO. Worst case played out....

Oh well..

TimeForChange · Post #1566 » by **TimeForChange** » Mon Apr 22, 2024 9:55 pm

Bruin wrote:Smh

Read on Twitter
?s=46

Scase · Post #1567 » by **Scase** » Mon Apr 22, 2024 9:55 pm

Duffman100 wrote:
Scase wrote:
Duffman100 wrote:
Okay, then you can isolate any part of any trade and highlight.

We spent a 2nd rounder on Marc Gasol and he helped us win the title. Period. What an amazing value deal, totally a legit argument to make.

But that is not at all what I am saying.

I said the trade cost us a FRP. But more appropriately, Dragic cost us a FRP. It is extremely common place for people to say X cost Y, when you need to attach a positive asset to a negative one to move it.

This isn't new, stop pretending like it is, it is an extremely common way to talk about trades and their acquisition cost.

No matter how you slice it, the trade resulted in us sending out, or, costing us a FRP.

And no matter how you slice it, Marc Gasol cost us a 2nd rounder.

It's the same argument, how are you not seeing this? You are omitting other details of the trade to higlight a portion.

And you're right, he did. What is your point?

I have listed out multiple times the entire transactions of the trade, Thad/FRP/Dragic/SRP. We still lost a FRP, I'm not omitting anything.

billy_hoyle wrote:
Scase wrote:
Duffman100 wrote:
Okay, then you can isolate any part of any trade and highlight.

We spent a 2nd rounder on Marc Gasol and he helped us win the title. Period. What an amazing value deal, totally a legit argument to make.

But that is not at all what I am saying.

I said the trade cost us a FRP. But more appropriately, Dragic cost us a FRP. It is extremely common place for people to say X cost Y, when you need to attach a positive asset to a negative one to move it.

This isn't new, stop pretending like it is, it is an extremely common way to talk about trades and their acquisition cost.

No matter how you slice it, the trade resulted in us sending out, or, costing us a FRP.

Out of curiosity, would trading the 30th pick for the 31st pick and cash be best summarized as 'costing a 1st round pick'?

I mean technically yes, but I would be willing to let that one slide :lol:

AbC? wrote:Feels right. When the process is poor, luck tends to work against you.

The Masai wins just keep on comin.

Lord_Zedd · Post #1568 » by **Lord_Zedd** » Mon Apr 22, 2024 9:56 pm

Of course it's 19. That's the most Toronto Raptor outcome

Grew · Post #1569 » by **Grew** » Mon Apr 22, 2024 9:58 pm

rigged

LoveMyRaps · Post #1570 » by **LoveMyRaps** » Mon Apr 22, 2024 9:58 pm

It's gonna be Zach Edey.

Carter, McCain, Collier, etc. will all be off the board.

LoveMyRaps · Post #1571 » by **LoveMyRaps** » Mon Apr 22, 2024 9:59 pm

To be fair....

19 is our lucky number.

2019 chip.

vulture · Post #1572 » by **vulture** » Mon Apr 22, 2024 10:01 pm

Raptors just can’t catch a break man.

TimeForChange · Post #1573 » by **TimeForChange** » Mon Apr 22, 2024 10:01 pm

LoveMyRaps wrote:It's gonna be Zach Edey.

Carter, McCain, Collier, etc. will all be off the board.

mccain won't be off the board.

if he is, other players will be available that the raps can still use: Tyler Kolek, Tyler Smith, Ja'Kobe Walter

In this draft, there is no difference between 16 and 19. Everyone in that group, like pretty much the entire draft, will be a role player who you hope one day, might become a starter.

HangTime · Post #1574 » by **HangTime** » Mon Apr 22, 2024 10:02 pm

I know tie breakers happens, but why don't they just determine it by seeding?

16 - Lakers (8th in West, going into play-in)
17 - Sixers (7th in east, going into play-in)
18 - Pacers (6th in east, going into playoffs)
19 - Magic (5th in east, going into playoffs)

alpngso · Post #1575 » by **alpngso** » Mon Apr 22, 2024 10:04 pm

Raptors not getting 6th or top 4 would be Chef’s kiss

Post #1576 » by **DG88** » Mon Apr 22, 2024 10:07 pm

vulture wrote:Raptors just can’t catch a break man.

That 6th pick is about to be San Antonio's in 20 days. That would be the cherry on top to this season.

LoveMyRaps · Post #1577 » by **LoveMyRaps** » Mon Apr 22, 2024 10:08 pm

alpngso wrote:Raptors not getting 6th or top 4 would be Chef’s kiss

Don't even care. Sarr wouldn't even be a top 5 in next year's draft. Retaining our 2025 pick is ideal. But I wouldn't be upset if we end up jumping into the top 4 this year.

vulture · Post #1578 » by **vulture** » Mon Apr 22, 2024 10:08 pm

DG88 wrote:
vulture wrote:Raptors just can’t catch a break man.

That 6th pick is about to be San Antonio's in 20 days. That would be the cherry on top to this season.

Why must you say this? That would be so depressing.

DreamTeam09 · Post #1579 » by **DreamTeam09** » Mon Apr 22, 2024 10:16 pm

LoveMyRaps wrote:It's gonna be Zach Edey.

Carter, McCain, Collier, etc. will all be off the board.

One of those guys will be there, Collier being the least likely

OAKLEY_2 · Post #1580 » by **OAKLEY_2** » Mon Apr 22, 2024 10:16 pm

LoveMyRaps wrote:To be fair....

19 is our lucky number.

2019 chip.

Time to go off grid and take uhm uhm Carlton Carrington. But truly if Edey is there grab him.