Crazy-Canuck wrote:Remember he's a young senior. He's like 3 years younger than Sam Young, so there is still potential for growth.
Sam is only a year older than T-Will
Moderators: 7 Footer, Duffman100, HiJiNX, niQ, Morris_Shatford, DG88, Reeko, lebron stopper
Crazy-Canuck wrote:Remember he's a young senior. He's like 3 years younger than Sam Young, so there is still potential for growth.
DG88 wrote:Crazy-Canuck wrote:Remember he's a young senior. He's like 3 years younger than Sam Young, so there is still potential for growth.
Sam is only a year older than T-Will
ansoncarter wrote:pretty sure RapsTV showed a little of his workout
believe they asked him if his jumper would hold him back, or something like that, and he said Jim Kelly told him he'd been watching him all season and thought he would be a really good shooter. Which struck me as funny. And sad. And perfect in a way.
DG88 wrote:ansoncarter wrote:pretty sure RapsTV showed a little of his workout
believe they asked him if his jumper would hold him back, or something like that, and he said Jim Kelly told him he'd been watching him all season and thought he would be a really good shooter. Which struck me as funny. And sad. And perfect in a way.
I think it was BC he was referring to if I'm not mistaken.
C_Money wrote:If DeRozan or Evans are picked before 9th I'de take T-Will
BigBurd wrote:Calling T-Will an "Excellent rebounder" is doing him a terrible disservice. Call him the *best* rebounding wing in years is more like it. His 8.6 per game is huge considering he played with a good front court!
Supersub15's adjusted stats has Terrence Williams 9.0 per game:
"..the best rebounding guard in the NBA (per 36 miuntes) is Jason Kidd at 6.5, followed by Iguodala at 5.7."
I don't see why T-Will couldn't managed a similar transition to AI; who averaged 8.4 for Arizona. The only other comparison I could think of was Shawn Marion - averaged 9.3 at UNLV, now averages 8.5 in the NBA. Both guys rebounding skills transitioned very well.
Don't forget his 5 assists per game either, another great stat.
supersub15 wrote:BigBurd wrote:Calling T-Will an "Excellent rebounder" is doing him a terrible disservice. Call him the *best* rebounding wing in years is more like it. His 8.6 per game is huge considering he played with a good front court!
Supersub15's adjusted stats has Terrence Williams 9.0 per game:
"..the best rebounding guard in the NBA (per 36 miuntes) is Jason Kidd at 6.5, followed by Iguodala at 5.7."
I don't see why T-Will couldn't managed a similar transition to AI; who averaged 8.4 for Arizona. The only other comparison I could think of was Shawn Marion - averaged 9.3 at UNLV, now averages 8.5 in the NBA. Both guys rebounding skills transitioned very well.
Don't forget his 5 assists per game either, another great stat.
My issue though is that we've improved tremendously rebounding-wise with the addition Pops and Marion. I don't want us to draft somebody just because he rebounds well. Renaldo Balkman is a good rebounder too... but not much else. If he doesn't improve his shot...
Mind you, I'd cry tears of joy if we can pick him with a second 1st-round pick.
Anatomize wrote:Question is, if we're filling a need here, why are we so bent on drafting him with a 2nd pick as opposed to the 1st one?
We've often seen players picked high because they were thought to be the best player available, and picks which were drafted later still had more successful NBA careers.
T-Will seems to fit everything our team is looking for at the SG spot, athleticism, tenacity, rebounding, defense, hustle, 3 point shooting, passing. You can't teach many of the intangibles T-will presents the Raptors with, he may become one of the most productive role player in this draft. Since we're also looking for immediate contribution, he may very well be the guy.
If we are not able to nab a 2nd pick, why are people against drafting a player who could very well make a difference in our win/loss column at the end of the year?
TiKusDom wrote:Anatomize wrote:Question is, if we're filling a need here, why are we so bent on drafting him with a 2nd pick as opposed to the 1st one?
We've often seen players picked high because they were thought to be the best player available, and picks which were drafted later still had more successful NBA careers.
T-Will seems to fit everything our team is looking for at the SG spot, athleticism, tenacity, rebounding, defense, hustle, 3 point shooting, passing. You can't teach many of the intangibles T-will presents the Raptors with, he may become one of the most productive role player in this draft. Since we're also looking for immediate contribution, he may very well be the guy.
If we are not able to nab a 2nd pick, why are people against drafting a player who could very well make a difference in our win/loss column at the end of the year?
It is important we maximize our assets including the 9th pick. If hes the guy for BC then fine, but dont waste the 9th lotto pick because that would be over reaching. Trade down and nab him at a lower position while getting more value in return with T-Will , wait until hes drafted 15th or whatnot and then trade the 9th pick for him. But this is only possible if you select a lotto talent with the 9th like a DeRozan , Jennings, Thabeet, or Evans and teams lower in the draft are willing to pay you to attain them. You select the BPA available and then go from there with the 9th, I do not think T-Will will be the BPA available with the 9th pick.
just23 wrote:By the way, no gm would want to sell a lottery pick for 3 million. Stupidity like that gets you fired. A late first rounder maybe, but around 15th? Are you kidding me?
brownbobcat wrote:just23 wrote:By the way, no gm would want to sell a lottery pick for 3 million. Stupidity like that gets you fired. A late first rounder maybe, but around 15th? Are you kidding me?
But, but, but ... Colangelo said the $3 mil we got for JO could buy back the pick we gave up!
brownbobcat wrote:just23 wrote:By the way, no gm would want to sell a lottery pick for 3 million. Stupidity like that gets you fired. A late first rounder maybe, but around 15th? Are you kidding me?
But, but, but ... Colangelo said the $3 mil we got for JO could buy back the pick we gave up!