OT: Bulls Epic Collapse + Swirsky (pg4)

Scase · Post #101 » by **Scase** » Tue Dec 22, 2009 9:05 pm

Sham wrote:Is there a reason why Noah for Bargnani, and all possible connotations thereof, are considered to be more likely than it was 36 hours ago? It's a Marcus Banks thing, isn't it?

There seems to be some convoluted thought process around here that thinks cause the bulls are **** the bed that they are willing to trade away one of the only good things their team has.

Post #102 » by **Three34** » Tue Dec 22, 2009 9:13 pm

...yet it's blasphemous to suggest that Toronto, in much the same situation, would deal DeMar Derozan. Righty-oh.

boogydown · Post #103 » by **boogydown** » Tue Dec 22, 2009 9:15 pm

supbro wrote:now that the bulls are the laughing stock of the NBA, we need to figure out some way to get
Noah here. How about Bargs + Banks for Noah/Rose/fillers ?

It's like saying, well because Microsoft is firing 10k employees, and the company is looking bad for today, Bill Gates should dump his company for pennies on the dollar.

People don't think sometimes.

Hobo Gonzolez · Post #104 » by **Hobo Gonzolez** » Tue Dec 22, 2009 9:16 pm

Sham wrote:...yet it's blasphemous to suggest that Toronto, in much the same situation, would deal DeMar Derozan. Righty-oh.

BC would trade DeRozan for a competent player if it wouldn't hurt his ego. Unfortunately for us, it does.

Scase · Post #105 » by **Scase** » Tue Dec 22, 2009 10:10 pm

Sham wrote:...yet it's blasphemous to suggest that Toronto, in much the same situation, would deal DeMar Derozan. Righty-oh.

Welcome to the raptors board? :lol:

McFurious1 · Post #106 » by **McFurious1** » Tue Dec 22, 2009 10:15 pm

Volcano wrote:
efrivela wrote:Bargnani/Derozan for Salmons/Noah ... get'r done B.C

ew..get outta here troll

he even put in the "get err done" trade mark.

Boobs · Post #107 » by **Boobs** » Wed Dec 23, 2009 1:03 am

Sham, would you consider a Calderon for Hinrich trade at this point?

______
Kingz

Post #108 » by **Three34** » Wed Dec 23, 2009 1:08 am

Nein.

Nothingface · Post #109 » by **Nothingface** » Wed Dec 23, 2009 1:18 am

Kingz wrote:Sham, would you consider a Calderon for Hinrich trade at this point?

______
Kingz

I don't understand the concept of asking someone who has no say in the matter whether he will consider something.

Gold Chain · Post #110 » by **Gold Chain** » Wed Dec 23, 2009 1:21 am

UssjTrunks wrote:
Sham wrote:It would be pretty awesome if those of you who "hate seeing Noah" could just be honest enough to admit that you do so because he has big hair, an ugly face, and screams a lot.

I would jizz my pants if he was on this team instead of Bargs or Bosh.

-1 x 2.

Post #111 » by **Three34** » Wed Dec 23, 2009 1:26 am

Nothingface wrote:
Kingz wrote:Sham, would you consider a Calderon for Hinrich trade at this point?

______
Kingz

I don't understand the concept of asking someone who has no say in the matter whether he will consider something.

So, would you consider boinking Olivia Munn?

Tom Baker · Post #112 » by **Tom Baker** » Wed Dec 23, 2009 1:27 am

Sham wrote:It would be pretty awesome if those of you who "hate seeing Noah" could just be honest enough to admit that you do so because he has big hair, an ugly face, and screams a lot.

LOL

I don't quite "hate" the guy, but if I did, it would probably be for those reasons. Except, I didn't know he screamed a lot.

Boobs · Post #113 » by **Boobs** » Wed Dec 23, 2009 2:02 am

Nothingface wrote:I don't understand the concept of asking someone who has no say in the matter whether he will consider something.

What's the point of the Trades and Transactions board? Matter of fact, why are you even coming on this site from the last 4 years?

_______
Kingz

Boobs · Post #114 » by **Boobs** » Wed Dec 23, 2009 2:03 am

Sham wrote:Nein.

Would Chicago prefer an expiring straight up for Hinrich?

______
Kingz

Gold Chain · Post #115 » by **Gold Chain** » Wed Dec 23, 2009 2:07 am

3rd quarter, Knicks smashing Bulls.

Bulls showing possible life, but one big Knick run and this is over early.

Post #116 » by **Three34** » Wed Dec 23, 2009 2:09 am

Bulls showing possible life, but one big Knick run and this is over early.

What, like yesterday?

tylrrr · Post #117 » by **tylrrr** » Wed Dec 23, 2009 2:56 am

Bulls finish with 10 assists. They really need to make some changes, they don't have any real spacing from what I've seen and while Derrick Rose may not have very good court vision, some room to operate would at least open it up for everyone else. I don't even think you can pin this one entirely on del Negro

ansoncarter · Post #118 » by **ansoncarter** » Wed Dec 23, 2009 4:58 am

starting to think derrick rose might be a soft player

twice in the last minute he had a chance to do something inside and chickened out. Bulls lost because of those two plays imo

and noah isn't on the same planet as bosh. Don't know why posts keep popping up about trading bosh for him. And especially not the ones about the bulls 'saying no' lol. He's good, but he's a center like amir is a center, plus his offence is freaking ugly

shmoosicle · Post #119 » by **shmoosicle** » Wed Dec 23, 2009 7:28 am

ansoncarter wrote:and noah isn't on the same planet as bosh. Don't know why posts keep popping up about trading bosh for him. And especially not the ones about the bulls 'saying no' lol. He's good, but he's a center like amir is a center, plus his offence is freaking ugly

I don't recall any Bosh for Noah posts, but I have seen a lot of Noah for Bargnani posts, with most people agreeing Noah would be a better fit on this team.

Wasp · Post #120 » by **Wasp** » Wed Dec 23, 2009 7:38 am

Rose is good, but the Bulls have ZERO scoring ability outside of him. A PG is only as good as the people he can pass the ball to.

There is also a severe lack of on-court leadership on the Bulls. If you thought we had leadership issues, the Bulls knock us out of the water.