New York Watch thread. The race for the 2010 #1 pick.

Moderators: FJS, Inigo Montoya

hoops4life
General Manager
Posts: 9,121
And1: 31
Joined: May 17, 2005

Re: New York Watch thread. The race for the 2010 #1 pick. 

Post#2121 » by hoops4life » Thu Apr 15, 2010 5:50 pm

Haha, they make the most out of their 2nd round picks and NDBL guys but have struggled with first rounders at times.

Really we should laugh at PHX for trading us this pick for nothing and not NY.
User avatar
seejaydeja
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,450
And1: 53
Joined: Nov 03, 2005
Location: provo
         

Re: New York Watch thread. The race for the 2010 #1 pick. 

Post#2122 » by seejaydeja » Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:00 pm

seejaydeja wrote:Knicks lose, Clippers win tonight. Both teams have identical records...So what is the tiebreaker?
Image
kebutah
Analyst
Posts: 3,533
And1: 99
Joined: Feb 10, 2005
Location: Clearfield Utah
       

Re: New York Watch thread. The race for the 2010 #1 pick. 

Post#2123 » by kebutah » Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:08 pm

I think they do a coin flip.
User avatar
seejaydeja
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,450
And1: 53
Joined: Nov 03, 2005
Location: provo
         

Re: New York Watch thread. The race for the 2010 #1 pick. 

Post#2124 » by seejaydeja » Thu Apr 15, 2010 7:25 pm

kebutah wrote:I think they do a coin flip.


It doesn't go by their season series? If it does, NY beat LAC twice so...
Image
Knicksick
Banned User
Posts: 2,691
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 05, 2009

Re: New York Watch thread. The race for the 2010 #1 pick. 

Post#2125 » by Knicksick » Thu Apr 15, 2010 8:56 pm

it's a coin flip. Don't worry Im 100% sure because as a Knick fan I'm an expert in these kind of questions.......
User avatar
Soul Patch
RealGM
Posts: 21,204
And1: 920
Joined: Jun 16, 2008
Location: I'm at the White Castle
Contact:

Re: New York Watch thread. The race for the 2010 #1 pick. 

Post#2126 » by Soul Patch » Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:03 pm

If we call anything but heads I have no hope in this franchise. Of course Jerry SlOWn and Kevin O'idiot are gonna call tails idiots.
Jugs wrote:Fark orf slet kent dome wuote ujquote exp
User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 31,150
And1: 14,374
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Los Angeles
     

Re: New York Watch thread. The race for the 2010 #1 pick. 

Post#2127 » by babyjax13 » Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:24 pm

Bat wrote:
Bat wrote:ESPN predicts the Knicks will finish at 32-50, tied for 7th worst in the league. Meaning even if 3 teams were to somehow jump ahead of them in the lottery the Jazz would still get a top 10 pick.

I'm hoping for 8 or higher. Top 3 would be a dream.


Dated 10/2/2009.

Guess I can't be too unhappy so far. We have a 57.3% chance at getting the 8th pick or higher!

Honestly that step between 8th and 9th could be big if Greg Monroe doesn't declare.


I agree with you, unless we luck out and someone reaches for Whiteside.
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
User avatar
seejaydeja
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,450
And1: 53
Joined: Nov 03, 2005
Location: provo
         

Re: New York Watch thread. The race for the 2010 #1 pick. 

Post#2128 » by seejaydeja » Thu Apr 15, 2010 11:00 pm

do they do the coin toss at the lotto?
Image
UTJazzFan_Echo1
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,769
And1: 279
Joined: Apr 04, 2009
Location: Utah
 

Re: New York Watch thread. The race for the 2010 #1 pick. 

Post#2129 » by UTJazzFan_Echo1 » Fri Apr 16, 2010 1:59 am

Tails never fails my good sir.

I'm not happy with where the pick is but I'm not greatly upset either. Like most of you are saying, it could have been much better and it could have been much worse.
Jerry Sloan >>>>>>>> Everything else.
User avatar
Soul Patch
RealGM
Posts: 21,204
And1: 920
Joined: Jun 16, 2008
Location: I'm at the White Castle
Contact:

Re: New York Watch thread. The race for the 2010 #1 pick. 

Post#2130 » by Soul Patch » Fri Apr 16, 2010 4:34 pm

UTJazzFan_Echo1 wrote:Tails never fails my good sir.

I'm not happy with where the pick is but I'm not greatly upset either. Like most of you are saying, it could have been much better and it could have been much worse.


When are these Sloan homers going to get clue? :nonono:
Jugs wrote:Fark orf slet kent dome wuote ujquote exp
User avatar
DelaneyRudd
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 104,144
And1: 9,340
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
         

Re: New York Watch thread. The race for the 2010 #1 pick. 

Post#2131 » by DelaneyRudd » Fri Apr 16, 2010 9:00 pm

I can't tell for sure but I think the flips went bad. LAC beat NYK (UT), and Utah (Min) beat Atlanta, meaning the second round pick lowered by 1.
User avatar
StocktonShorts
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,386
And1: 2,551
Joined: Jun 02, 2009
   

Re: New York Watch thread. The race for the 2010 #1 pick. 

Post#2132 » by StocktonShorts » Fri Apr 16, 2010 9:12 pm

Yeah, Ross Siler just reported they lost the coin toss. Terrible luck for the Jazz over the last month.
Image
User avatar
LjJazzman
General Manager
Posts: 8,441
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 11, 2004
Location: The OV

Re: New York Watch thread. The race for the 2010 #1 pick. 

Post#2133 » by LjJazzman » Fri Apr 16, 2010 9:15 pm

http://basketball.realgm.com/src_wireta ... finalized/
The teams entered in the lottery, to be held on May 18, 2010, are as follows (note: the first three picks in the Draft will be determined by the lottery and the remainder of the “lottery teams” will select in positions 4 through 14 in inverse order of their consolidated standings at the end of the regular season):

Teams in Lottery
- Chances out of 1,000

New Jersey, 250
Minnesota, 199
Sacramento, 156
Golden State, 104
Washington, 103
Philadelphia, 53
Detroit, 53
LA Clippers, 23
New York, 22
Indiana, 11
New Orleans, 8
Memphis, 7
Toronto, 6
Houston, 5

The order for the remainder of the first round picks is as follows:

15. Chicago (To Milwaukee)
16. Charlotte (To Minnesota via Denver)
17. Milwaukee (To Chicago)
18. Miami
19. Boston
20. San Antonio
21. Oklahoma City
22. Portland
23. Utah (To Minnesota via Philadelphia)
24. Atlanta
25. Denver (To Memphis)
26. Phoenix (To Oklahoma City)
27. Dallas (To New Jersey)
28. LA Lakers (To Memphis)
29. Orlando
30. Cleveland (To Washington)

Second Round

31. New Jersey
32. Minnesota (To Oklahoma City)
33. Sacramento
34/35. Washington
34/35. Golden State
36/37. Detroit
36/37. Philadelphia (To Milwaukee)
38/39. New York
38/39. LA Clippers (To New York via Denver)
40. Indiana
41. New Orleans (To Miami)
42/43. Toronto (To Miami)
42/43. Memphis (To LA Lakers)
44. Chicago (To Portland)
45. Houston (To Minnesota)
46. Charlotte (To Phoenix)
47. Milwaukee
48. Miami
49. San Antonio
50. Oklahoma City (To Dallas)
51. Portland (To Oklahoma City via Dallas and Minnesota)
52. Boston
53. Atlanta
54. Denver (To LA Clippers)
55. Utah
56. Phoenix (To Minnesota)
57. Dallas
58. LA Lakers
59. Orlando
60. Cleveland (To Phoenix)



Read more: http://basketball.realgm.com/src_wireta ... z0lIfQyDCy
User avatar
seejaydeja
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,450
And1: 53
Joined: Nov 03, 2005
Location: provo
         

Re: New York Watch thread. The race for the 2010 #1 pick. 

Post#2134 » by seejaydeja » Fri Apr 16, 2010 9:21 pm

#9 it is.
Image
User avatar
enIIgma_chan
Sophomore
Posts: 164
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 21, 2007
Location: Ariiizonaaa~a!!

Re: New York Watch thread. The race for the 2010 #1 pick. 

Post#2135 » by enIIgma_chan » Fri Apr 16, 2010 10:09 pm

Utah's always never lucky when it comes to select position in the lottery draft. Moving back one spot, we lose a chance of gettin' a good player. But I'm hoping Ed Davis, Greg Monroe or even Patrick Patterson will be available when # 9 comes around. I'm not too sold on Aldrich.. I'd avoid drafting him imho.
hoops4life
General Manager
Posts: 9,121
And1: 31
Joined: May 17, 2005

Re: New York Watch thread. The race for the 2010 #1 pick. 

Post#2136 » by hoops4life » Fri Apr 16, 2010 10:52 pm

It is the difference between 23/22 out of a 1000. I know we want to have the best chance possible but that is pretty insignificant.
User avatar
Effigy
RealGM
Posts: 13,602
And1: 12,100
Joined: Nov 27, 2001
     

Re: New York Watch thread. The race for the 2010 #1 pick. 

Post#2137 » by Effigy » Fri Apr 16, 2010 11:30 pm

hoops4life wrote:It is the difference between 23/22 out of a 1000. I know we want to have the best chance possible but that is pretty insignificant.


In moving up sure, but if neither team moves up, the Clippers will draft 8th ,and the Jazz 9th, which is the most likely scenario. If you'd won the flip, you'd be drafting 8th and the Clipps 9th.
Knicksick
Banned User
Posts: 2,691
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 05, 2009

Re: New York Watch thread. The race for the 2010 #1 pick. 

Post#2138 » by Knicksick » Sat Apr 17, 2010 1:16 am

yeah one position can make a difference---last draft everyone and their mothers in NY wanted Stephen Curry and he got picked one spot ahead of our spot. Still 9th pick in this draft should net you something worthwhile.
User avatar
Reckless
Analyst
Posts: 3,540
And1: 564
Joined: May 21, 2007
   

Re: New York Watch thread. The race for the 2010 #1 pick. 

Post#2139 » by Reckless » Sat Apr 17, 2010 3:22 am

Of course we lose the coin toss. We have no luck
User avatar
Ming Kong!
RealGM
Posts: 24,480
And1: 31
Joined: Nov 21, 2002
Location: Jazz fan in Miami, FL.

Re: New York Watch thread. The race for the 2010 #1 pick. 

Post#2140 » by Ming Kong! » Sat Apr 17, 2010 4:33 am

Big deal, out chances of getting the #1 pick go from .023 to .022, yeah that's it. It's almost the same chance, we're probably getting 8/9th, we could get a little lucky too, then again we could drop a little, but after the first few picks, sliding and down is far less common.

Return to Utah Jazz