Beauty of the Day Archives

Induveca · Post #41 » by **Induveca** » Sun May 18, 2008 9:50 pm

4/10......camera magic. She's very short (big problem for me, i'm 6'4.....hate 5'4 and below).....she's also semi-fat. Tons of makeup.

Boo!

3/10

JWizmentality · Post #42 » by **JWizmentality** » Sun May 18, 2008 11:03 pm

Induveca wrote:4/10......camera magic. She's very short (big problem for me, i'm 6'4.....hate 5'4 and below).....she's also semi-fat. Tons of makeup.

Boo!

3/10

I thought people liked a little meat on their bones.

mohammed10 · Post #43 » by **mohammed10** » Sun May 18, 2008 11:42 pm

OK JWiz - next!

Can we get some diversity to this beauty competition?

:pray:

JWizmentality · Post #44 » by **JWizmentality** » Sun May 18, 2008 11:42 pm

mohammed10 wrote:OK JWiz - next!

Can we get some diversity to this beauty competition?

YOU RASCIST BASTARD!! :evil:

Wizards2Lottery · Post #45 » by **Wizards2Lottery** » Mon May 19, 2008 12:22 am

Yo JWiz i liked this one. I think this girl is beautiful. Don't listen to the haters.

8/10!

mohammed10 · Post #46 » by **mohammed10** » Mon May 19, 2008 12:27 am

JWizmentality wrote:-
YOU RASCIST BASTARD!!

Hey, just looking for some beauties of the non-caucasian persuation here.

:nod:

Induveca · Post #47 » by **Induveca** » Mon May 19, 2008 1:45 am

mohammed10 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Hey, just looking for some beauties of the non-caucasian persuation here.

I hear that, latinas please.

Post #48 » by **LyricalRico** » Mon May 19, 2008 2:07 am

JWizmentality wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

I thought people liked a little meat on their bones.

Not likely. You, me, and SumTingWong might be the only ones who prefer women with non-visible rib cages. I'm not saying that skinny women aren't beautiful but to say that this chick is "pudgy" or "semi-fat" is ridiculous.

JWizmentality · Post #49 » by **JWizmentality** » Mon May 19, 2008 4:40 am

Every little boy has that one moment, that one girl, that one picture which catapolted them into puberty. This one did it for me. I remember the first time I saw this photo growing up back home and being completely transfixed. It's almost impossible to get a copy of this poster now in it's full resolution glory. It was taken back in 1972....yes people 19 frikkin 72. A girl with a body like that in 19 frikkin 72. A photographer was hired by the Jamaican Tourist Board to capture the island in a single photo. What impressed him the most about the country were the beautiful women, so while staying at a hotel he just happened by a young lady that caught his attention, and she agreed to do the photo. It was an instant hit, but the identity of the girl remained a mystery for years. So, I'll leave it at that.

Induveca · Post #50 » by **Induveca** » Mon May 19, 2008 5:01 am

I remember that chick from 1990s SI Swimsuit, what year no clue. She gets a 10/10. Simply beautiful woman.

And that Jamaica chick has an amazing body.

Wizards2Lottery · Post #51 » by **Wizards2Lottery** » Mon May 19, 2008 10:55 am

6/10 not really digging it

Soup's Uncle · Post #52 » by **Soup's Uncle** » Mon May 19, 2008 4:17 pm

She's hot, but nowadays she's probably beat.

ZonkertheBrainless · Post #53 » by **ZonkertheBrainless** » Mon May 19, 2008 4:26 pm

nice. not sure about the nose though.

JWizmentality · Post #54 » by **JWizmentality** » Mon May 19, 2008 5:29 pm

^^ Rating people?? From now on, I'm just going to guesstimate the rating you people don't post...and I'm very very biased.

ZonkertheBrainless · Post #55 » by **ZonkertheBrainless** » Mon May 19, 2008 5:31 pm

fine... uh... 9 out of ten for the gozongas and the natural look and being reasonably tall, -2 for the nose. seven out of ten. happy?

WizBiz · Post #56 » by **WizBiz** » Mon May 19, 2008 7:39 pm

6.5/10. I'm sure she was pretty hot, but I'm not liking the pictures so much.

Post #57 » by **miller31time** » Mon May 19, 2008 8:42 pm

floydfan29 wrote:6.5/10. I'm sure she was pretty hot, but I'm not liking the pictures so much.

Same. In a few of the pictures, she was looking a bit man-ish. In others, she looked really good. I'm just not a huge fan of her strong facial features, to be honest.

mohammed10 · Post #58 » by **mohammed10** » Mon May 19, 2008 10:26 pm

Now that's more like it - 7.5 for me

Love that iconic Jamaica photo!

:bowdown:

doclinkin · Post #59 » by **doclinkin** » Tue May 20, 2008 2:15 am

LyricalRico wrote:Not likely. You, me, and SumTingWong might be the only ones who prefer women with non-visible rib cages. I'm not saying that skinny women aren't beautiful but to say that this chick is "pudgy" or "semi-fat" is ridiculous.

Nope, I'm with you on that. I can't see the attraction if she doesn't have an actual figure. A bit of swoop and softness, or an assertive fundament-- either way.

And for me it's got to be all natural. If I see silicon, it ain't for me. Who wants bionics? Texture is as important as looks or smell, way I see it. What makes a woman, womanly? Whatever that is is what I like-- not top-heavy unbalanced underfed little girls puking up their appetizers so they can have dessert.

'Why I'll just abstain from the thread. Carry on.

doclinkin · Post #60 » by **doclinkin** » Tue May 20, 2008 2:19 am

But yes to that classic Jamaica pic. Place where I get a goat roti had that one up for a long time. Easy on the eyes.