ImageImageImageImageImage

The RealGM Wizards Board Draft Thread 2008/2009

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

Wizardspride
RealGM
Posts: 15,760
And1: 9,866
Joined: Nov 05, 2004
Location: Olney, MD/Kailua/Kaneohe, HI
       

Re: The RealGM Wizards Board Draft Thread 2008/2009 

Post#631 » by Wizardspride » Sun Feb 15, 2009 1:37 am

Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:
nate33 wrote:Doc, you've sold me on Curry. I also like that Dat2U likes him. If we end up picking third or lower, I say trade down, dump some bad contracts (maybe in exchange for a decent vet), and draft Curry. If we pick second, I'm torn between drafting Hill or trading down for Curry. Obviously, if we pick first, we'll take Griffin and be done with it.

The Wizards, if they don't pick 1st overall and select Griffin, should trade down for Curry.


Personally, I 'd prefer Thabeet a hundred times over Curry.

But that's just me.
President Trump told two senior Russian officials in a 2017 Oval Office meeting that he was unconcerned about Moscow’s interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election because the United States did the same in other countries
User avatar
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 22,544
And1: 3,529
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: The RealGM Wizards Board Draft Thread 2008/2009 

Post#632 » by closg00 » Sun Feb 15, 2009 1:47 am

fishercob wrote:I wish I could put money in Vegas on Thabeet being a complete bust. The guy's a total stiff.


:lol: How much?

"Thabeet, to me, might be the best player in the country," Seton Hall coach Bobby Gonzalez said. "I don't know who has a better player than him, who is a more dominant guy than him in the country. He, to me, is the No. 1 player in America. In my opinion from what I have seen, you know I am not trying to push him out the door, have him go pro, but if I was an NBA franchise I would take him No. 1 in the draft."
AgentOvechkin08
Pro Prospect
Posts: 770
And1: 0
Joined: May 31, 2008

Re: The RealGM Wizards Board Draft Thread 2008/2009 

Post#633 » by AgentOvechkin08 » Sun Feb 15, 2009 4:19 am

I still dont get all the love for curry. We got scoring guards in young, arenas, critt (to some extent). Yea curry has an outside shot, but like Rafael122 said, we dont need him. He is 6'2, and i dont think he will be able to guard anybody.

We need a PF rebounding machine who can dominate. Ding Ding


BLAKE GRIFFIN
He only had 40 pts. and 23 boards. He had 30 and 19 with 15 minutes left in the game. I would even take Thabeet over curry like wizardspride said. We need better big men. With that slight possibility of McGee possible playing the 4. (H. Brown mentioned it on the ESPN broadcast)

The one guard that really intrigues me is Demar Derozan. He has been quiet but his HS tapes are unbelievable. If he could put together his physical gifts with his talent he will be special. He got LeBron type athleticism.
GO SKINS
GO WIZ
GO CAPS

GO DC BABY

maybe the Nats, in like 10 years
User avatar
doclinkin
RealGM
Posts: 13,228
And1: 5,359
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: .wizuds.

Re: The RealGM Wizards Board Draft Thread 2008/2009 

Post#634 » by doclinkin » Sun Feb 15, 2009 4:45 am

Was gonna post college comparisons re: Ben Gordan (played with legit NBA talent --Okafor, Caron, Villenueva, Hilton Armstrong, Josh Boone-- hell he should have had _waay more_ assists than his 4 per game.

But mostly I just liked the look on JT3's face (cropped off since it's too large)in this picture :

"What the hell, how do we stop this kid?"

Image
User avatar
doclinkin
RealGM
Posts: 13,228
And1: 5,359
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: .wizuds.

Re: The RealGM Wizards Board Draft Thread 2008/2009 

Post#635 » by doclinkin » Sun Feb 15, 2009 4:59 am

But just to make it clear since I've typed it to death already:

THE POINT IS THAT (after #1) THE PICK HAS BETTER VALUE IN TRADE THAN THE VALUE OF THE EARLY PICKS.

I take Griffin no question. Then I take Bosh. Or Vince Carter. Or the best deal you can get with a package of one of Jamison/Blatche/Caron/Nick/filler + the pick for a better defender in either the frontcourt or 2-guard. In realistic equivalent value. Plus their pick.

With the trade down you take the best available talent regardless of position. It's my assessment that you get that value best for Curry. Mine alone. I'm happy to be on an island on this, and apologize if I've talked anyone else into it.

But anyone who think this team doesn't need to develop a back-up scoring/distributing/floor general/clutch/winning guard hasn't been paying attention. Yeah we need perimeter defense. No doubt. But scheme alone can help some. And you don't tend to pick your best defenders in the draft. They tend to come from free agency, often from guys who've had to go to Europe to learn how to do it. Veterans defend better than raw recruits. To get them you have to clear some roster and cap space, via trade. In the draft you build for the future, not immediate help.

Picking for perceived team need lands you Pecherov, not Rondo or Farmar.
AgentOvechkin08
Pro Prospect
Posts: 770
And1: 0
Joined: May 31, 2008

Re: The RealGM Wizards Board Draft Thread 2008/2009 

Post#636 » by AgentOvechkin08 » Sun Feb 15, 2009 5:13 am

I would love to pick Blake Griffin and Jodie Meeks in the 2nd round. Meeks will definitely be there.

He has scoring ability, a little undersized but he is effective. He went off for 45, remember he went for 50+ earlier in the season.
GO SKINS
GO WIZ
GO CAPS

GO DC BABY

maybe the Nats, in like 10 years
User avatar
doclinkin
RealGM
Posts: 13,228
And1: 5,359
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: .wizuds.

Re: The RealGM Wizards Board Draft Thread 2008/2009 

Post#637 » by doclinkin » Sun Feb 15, 2009 8:25 am

placeholder for more developed thoughts:
=============================================

pg/combos -- needs: deep scoring, distribution, leadership, PER production.
(& Defense, if no Critt/DMac)
Growth of Bigs dependent on the on-ball guard. Few Big PGs to play next to Gil.
-------------------------
--Jeff Teague (defense despite size, perimeter blocks, steals; fg%'s, FT attempts. No passing)
--Curry (ad nauseum-- good defense, remember biggest need: IQ more than talent, ball smarts)
--Nick Calathes (all 'round game. good size. passing, IQ, good fit next to Gil; brother Pat Calathes)
--Ty Lawson (short neck, wide chest/wingspan, strong. but also short arms. Competitor. Probable NCAA champ. leader on most talented team, undeniable effect despite advantages of surrounding talent. Leadership.)
--Ricky won't come out to play
--Sergio Llull (as a rd 2 Eurostash. And can we steal Kopponen from the Blazers?)

--Terrance Wms vs Jrue -- contrast of defensive specialists.

(other running notes: McClintock, Meeks, Johnny Flynn & wide open 'Cuse, Jerel McNeal next to Dominic James, Hackett)
==================================================================


swing/backcourt -- needs: IQ, replacement for DSteve, slashing/FTAs, defense, passing/boards
-------------------------
Evan Turner (sleeper) -- needs confidence in his outside shot, but otherwise ideal next to Gil? Or duplicate what Dom brings, plus scoring?
Danny Green -- as SF--no FT's, better passing than handle. DSteve replacement.
Harden as Glue guy -- great on a trade-down if he slips in workouts/measurements. Other than d, great running dog for Gil.
Henderson -- what no FTs?
Sylven Landesburg -- won't come out, but still...


The LeBron question --length vs strength vs smarts vs athletix. Consider Caron/Jamison.
-------------------------------------
Earl Clark -vs- DMcGuire -vs- Aminu for instance
Geoff McDermott, but no.

===========================================================
post intimidation -- (the real LeBron solution)
-------------------------
Griff
Jordan Hill -- grunt work, smart positional defense, hustle & strong.
Blair (equiv steals/40 to PG. also: with better conditioning, imagine his numbers, totals in only 25 mins./game)
Monroe vs. Blatche
Thabeet vs McGee

Brockman, Hendrix, Jeff Adrien, etc. Too bad we lack roster spots.
User avatar
WizStorm
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 9,498
And1: 8
Joined: Nov 02, 2001
Location: Virginia Beach, VA

Re: The RealGM Wizards Board Draft Thread 2008/2009 

Post#638 » by WizStorm » Sun Feb 15, 2009 8:49 am

Blake Griffin with 40 and 23 last night. :o
FreeBalling
Starter
Posts: 2,486
And1: 218
Joined: Jan 30, 2007
 

Re: The RealGM Wizards Board Draft Thread 2008/2009 

Post#639 » by FreeBalling » Sun Feb 15, 2009 2:50 pm

WizStorm wrote:Blake Griffin with 40 and 23 last night. :o


That kid Thabeet is a beast, you can never have enough big men. Better yet - good big men are excelent trade bait. I'm excited about the draft and picking low.

My draft picks 1-3 - I'd love to have eather 1 or 2. Not excited about Curry at all.

1. Thabeet - Game changer. My pick for #1 as of today.
2. Griffin - Another big, got to love it.
3. Curry - we don't need him,
FINAL UPDATE
With full military honors, Master Sgt. James W Holt was laid to rest at Arlington National Cemetery today. May 15
You Are Not Forgotten
RIP Master Sergent Holt :usa:

The ultimate sacrifice http://taskforceomegainc.org/H061.html
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 52,634
And1: 8,994
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: The RealGM Wizards Board Draft Thread 2008/2009 

Post#640 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Sun Feb 15, 2009 3:10 pm

You can never have enough minutes at C behind Haywood for not one or two, but three big men (not even counting Pecherov) if Hill or Thabeet is the pick. I agree with doc, too bad we don't have roster spots.

Blatche, Mcgee, and Pecherov are all 22 years of age or younger. (Edited: Oleksiy turned 23 in December). I see absolutely no way drafting another young C is the answer. Thabeet is a tremendous shotblocker, but I don't see how the Wizards add him if they plan on doing anything at all at C with Javale McGee.

I don't trust the Wizards to successfully trade any of the young big men and see nothing but diminishing value with dimisnishing minutes/stats if they draft another C.

Griffin is freakishly athletic and clearly a PF. He's IMO an easy pick if the Wizards get the 1st overall pick.
Bye bye Beal.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 67,021
And1: 19,325
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: The RealGM Wizards Board Draft Thread 2008/2009 

Post#641 » by nate33 » Sun Feb 15, 2009 3:50 pm

Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:I don't trust the Wizards to successfully trade any of the young big men and see nothing but diminishing value with dimisnishing minutes/stats if they draft another C.

Exactly. With so many unrefined big men fighting for minutes, nobody is going to have a chance to really showcase themselves for a trade. Ultimately, one of them must be traded and we will not get equivalent value.

I remember a similar situation back when we had Webber, Howard, R.Wallace and Muresan all competing for the 96 available minutes at PF and C. We ended up getting far less than fair value when we traded Wallace for Strickland.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,579
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: The RealGM Wizards Board Draft Thread 2008/2009 

Post#642 » by Ruzious » Sun Feb 15, 2009 4:00 pm

I'll take the counter-point prick role - my natural position.
doclinkin wrote:I take Griffin no question. Then I take Bosh. Or Vince Carter. Or the best deal you can get with a package of one of Jamison/Blatche/Caron/Nick/filler + the pick for a better defender in either the frontcourt or 2-guard. In realistic equivalent value. Plus their pick.

Why do so many people here have a crush on getting VC? What has he won in the NBA? And now that he's past his prime years, why is he going to all of a sudden become a winner? Are Mitch Richmond and Stackmoney not available? By all means - go after Bosh - but stay away from VC.

But anyone who think this team doesn't need to develop a back-up scoring/distributing/floor general/clutch/winning guard hasn't been paying attention.

So, we get Lebron or Kobe to be a backup PG - no problem.
Yeah we need perimeter defense. No doubt. But scheme alone can help some. And you don't tend to pick your best defenders in the draft. They tend to come from free agency, often from guys who've had to go to Europe to learn how to do it. Veterans defend better than raw recruits. To get them you have to clear some roster and cap space, via trade. In the draft you build for the future, not immediate help.

So, when drafting players... we should forget about defensive ability. It's not an issue. WHAT??? We can get someone from Europe to take care of that. Yeah... someone like Pecherov. That's the ticket.

Picking for perceived team need lands you Pecherov, not Rondo or Farmar.

In that case, pick Thabeet at 2. He has the most talent. Pecherov was picked as much for the ability to store him away as well as potential. They didn't pick him for positional need - if they did, they would have put him on the rostrum.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 52,634
And1: 8,994
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: The RealGM Wizards Board Draft Thread 2008/2009 

Post#643 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Sun Feb 15, 2009 4:10 pm

Carter's actually a good defender at both SG and SF, Ruz.

I pointed out in another thread that over the past three (or was it 4?) years he's played in 45 more regular season games than Butler.

Carter at SG in place of Jamison at PF, with the Wizards drafting Griffin (or another stud PF) could make the Wizards all that much better with Arenas and Haywood back next season.

Carter's still a good player because he would add scoring, rebounding, a whole lot better passing, and believe it or not, defense at SG.
Bye bye Beal.
barelyawake
Head Coach
Posts: 6,085
And1: 665
Joined: Aug 07, 2004

Re: The RealGM Wizards Board Draft Thread 2008/2009 

Post#644 » by barelyawake » Sun Feb 15, 2009 5:09 pm

"With the trade down you take the best available talent regardless of position."
OK, but best talent means when factoring in both offense and defense (in otherwords overall effect in the game).

"Picking for perceived team need lands you Pecherov, not Rondo or Farmar."
Right, and that's why you trade that pick for a future first and gamble. Instead of Opec, you look ahead to future years and guess which teams are not going to panout, and make your mid-pick a future first.

"I don't trust the Wizards to successfully trade any of the young big men"
But, that's not the test. The test is what could end up helping the most, not what will happen. Because we ain't doing the Curry thing. So, we're dealing in a mental sport of what would be best.

"But anyone who think this team doesn't need to develop a back-up scoring/distributing/floor general/clutch/winning guard hasn't been paying attention."
ONE THAT PLAYS DEFENSE. That's all I'm asking. One who can come in and replace Gil with a defensive stand. One who can run with Young and at least form an avg defensive backcourt. One who can hopefully pair with a vet and be a force defensively. That way, at least 1/4 of the time we have a great defensive backcourt.

"And you don't tend to pick your best defenders in the draft. They tend to come from free agency, often from guys who've had to go to Europe to learn how to do it. Veterans defend better than raw recruits."
Rondo. But, you're right that vets are better. So, trade the pick for a vet and a future first. Can you trade a pick twice? I forget the rules on that. Can you trade down, and then trade it again? Tradedown for Bosh (with the pick plus players), then trade away for a vet SG who plays defense (for the lower pick plus more players). That's obviously not happening. But, nethier is trading down for Curry. Again, trade AJ for Stephen Jackson. Hell, Thabo and Hinirch are on the block. They play d. Marquis Daniels, Ariza, Delfino, Des Mas, etc are free agents. They play d and can score.

Again, IMO we are arguing over bench players (who may start, but not on championship teams). That's why you trade the pick for a future first.
User avatar
doclinkin
RealGM
Posts: 13,228
And1: 5,359
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: .wizuds.

Re: The RealGM Wizards Board Draft Thread 2008/2009 

Post#645 » by doclinkin » Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:35 pm

Ruzious wrote:By all means - go after Bosh - but stay away from VC.


FWIW I lean towards your opinion on VC. I was looking for a consensus name for a back-court star who is likely to share the peak years of Gilbert, Caron, Haywood, whatnot and maximize our 'Win Now' potential. Thing is, in the current era the NBA isn't all that deep with 2-guard stars. Sorta the flaw in my argument. I would have said Rudy, but can't make a convincing argument that Portland would accept. I could have plugged in TMac and his massive contract, but he's about as problematic as Wince. Finding a star player who works well next to Gil is tricksy, a big unselfish ballhandler who plays defense, slashes, distributes, hts the three. Vince does all that (okay, 'unselfish' is arguable, but he passes). Mike Miller?

There are role players out there, possible available non-stars (argue merits of: Batum, Thabo, JChill in Europe, HInrich) but we lack roster space and cap room. Some part of the trade-down scenario involves both upgrade (to fit our core personnel--and new coach, new scheme) and ideally, roster dump to free up roster slots/ tax room.

The frontcourt is a different story considering we've seen on the market KG, Amare, JO, rumors about Bosh, etc. The value of that #2 pick gets us better value in trade for players of this stock.


Picking for perceived team need lands you Pecherov, not Rondo or Farmar.

In that case, pick Thabeet at 2. He has the most talent.


I'm on record early that Thabeet is a top talent in this draft. A Mutombo-effect player. Intimidator. For that reason I think he'd be coveted by teams willing to overpay to move up. We get better value listening to deals. We get picks this year, lower, at roster spots of greater need, and possibly future picks as well, in years when we have cleared up space.

Here? We need our Jeff Adrien. Thabeet makes stupid mistakes on positional defense. Adrien covers his ass by doing the dirty work behind him. We have our Thabeet in McGee, who will also be a better offensive threat. If we could swap out Jamison/filler for a Backcourt threat ideal fit, and land picks/roster space to draft DeJuan Blair or whatnot (depending on the coach and scheme) that's one pssibily.

But Thabeet is a poor fit next to either of Haywood or McGee. Some part of the trade-down take-best-available-talent scenario is value-for-pick. You get a cheaper player at any of various need positions, a higher quality role player, non-star. Less pressure for immediate impact to displace a guy in front of them who is currently better. Better ability to develop.

DeJuan Blair, James Harden, Stef Curry, Nick Calathes, Danny Green, Evan Turner. I expect guys like this to be available later (Harden will slide after measurements and workouts) who will find a clearly defined role and give better value for the pick than some of the unpolished top pure talents.

So, when drafting players... we should forget about defensive ability. It's not an issue. WHAT??? We can get someone from Europe to take care of that. Yeah... someone like Pecherov. That's the ticket.


I'm looking at Americans who had to go to Europe to learn to defend. Bruce Bowen is an example. Or Argentinians like Manu. You play one game a week in Euroball, spend the rest drilling fundamentals. Team defense. You don't ignore defensive talent in the draft, I'm saying you tend to get your best defenders out of veteran roleplayers who were marginal players until they learned to commit to defense. Veteran professional roleplayers, in whatever league. Posey, for instance. Veteran savvy comes from both instinct and experience. You can draft instinct. It's tougher to draft experience.

(Not impossible though, with high level NCAA upperclassmen with tournament wins. Ty Lawson, Danny Green, etc. Or even players raised around the game since day one. McGees notwithstanding).

That said, re: lil' Stef. People significantly underestimate the kid's defense. He makes no mistakes, plays strong, boxes out, anticipates, closes out well, cuts off passing and driving lanes. No 2-guard has killed him on the post-up yet, or run over him. Get past the babyface. While he ain't a lockdown threat, he's not as small as you think. Stronger than he looks.

More importantly, he knows who is supposed to be where, directs his teammates where to be. Point, shove, talk. Okay, bigger perimeter NBAers will shoot over him. Faster quick twitch players might get around him. But half our problem here has been smarts, not athletics. Not saying he's the answer, just saying he's not the liability you think. If the guy next to him and behind him have been put in the right spot, you'll take the occasional point given up.

Trade for vet, right fit, roster room. Swap picks. Pick best talent. And please Gawds of Ball can we draft some smart players who actually know what to do out there? Or Blake Griffin, either way.
User avatar
doclinkin
RealGM
Posts: 13,228
And1: 5,359
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: .wizuds.

Re: The RealGM Wizards Board Draft Thread 2008/2009 

Post#646 » by doclinkin » Sun Feb 15, 2009 7:42 pm

barelyawake wrote:"Picking for perceived team need lands you Pecherov, not Rondo or Farmar."
Right, and that's why you trade that pick for a future first and gamble. Instead of Opec, you look ahead to future years and guess which teams are not going to panout, and make your mid-pick a future first.

So, trade the pick for a vet and a future first. Can you trade a pick twice? I forget the rules on that. Can you trade down, and then trade it again? Tradedown for Bosh (with the pick plus players), then trade away for a vet SG who plays defense (for the lower pick plus more players). That's obviously not happening. But, nethier is trading down for Curry. Again, trade AJ for Stephen Jackson. Hell, Thabo and Hinirch are on the block. They play d. Marquis Daniels, Ariza, Delfino, Des Mas, etc are free agents. They play d and can score.

Again, IMO we are arguing over bench players (who may start, but not on championship teams). That's why you trade the pick for a future first.


Nah, I don't even think we're arguing since you're saying here what I've been saying all along. The only difference is I think Curry will be a better player than you do. And you think a future pick will have a better value, or equivalent value when we may need it more. The only quibble is in the no-man's-land of wondering how much value we can get from a #2-5 pick plus a player plus filler. For Thabeet at #2 I think we can get lower picks and future picks, and have a decent choice of workable deals to pick from.

Yes, you can trade a pick twice. Portland constantly packages picks to maximize their draft, even buying 2nd round picks for cash then trading up. The Ted Leonsis era can't come fast enough, except of course that I wish nothing but good fortune and health to old Unca Abe.
barelyawake
Head Coach
Posts: 6,085
And1: 665
Joined: Aug 07, 2004

Re: The RealGM Wizards Board Draft Thread 2008/2009 

Post#647 » by barelyawake » Sun Feb 15, 2009 9:10 pm

doclinkin wrote:I'm looking at Americans who had to go to Europe to learn to defend. Bruce Bowen is an example. Or Argentinians like Manu. You play one game a week in Euroball, spend the rest drilling fundamentals. Team defense.


I got pummeled for about a month solid (and then some) explaining this several years ago in my "we need a foreign player" thread -- where I broke down the systems around the world that tend to produce the best defenders (especially when it comes to team d, and/or being glue guys), and generally why that is. Remember the "they play basketball like soccer" argument?
User avatar
Rafael122
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 20,052
And1: 2,779
Joined: Oct 11, 2004
       

Re: The RealGM Wizards Board Draft Thread 2008/2009 

Post#648 » by Rafael122 » Sun Feb 15, 2009 9:24 pm

I just don't understand the fatuation with Stephen Curry.

Look at what Chad Ford lists as positives for Curry:

# One of the best scorers in the country
# Amazing shooter with deep, deep range
# Excellent at putting the ball on the floor and drawing fouls
# Deadeye from the foul line
# Good rebounder for his size
# Excellent basketball IQ, solid passer
# Clutch scorer
# Picks up steals


There's nothing here that suggests anything about defense. He picks up steals...that's it. Everything else has to do with offense, amazing shooter, clutch scorer, excellent from the free throw line. None of this is what we need. If we trade down, we're trading down to either shed bad contracts and/or pick up a quality bench player who could defend, i.e. a guy like Gerald Henderson, or small guards like Eric Maynor or Darren Collison who could defend guys and can move their feet.

I've seen a handful of games of Curry, and when this guy is off, he's AWFUL. I believe it was a game against the College of Charleston or something, maybe about a week or so ago, at one point missed 11 straight shots. He attempted a three from the corner and it hit the side of the board. He scored, I believe, 6 points in the 2nd half after getting 19 in the first.

Remember Adam Morrison and the hype he got because he could score? He can't do much of anything and from all accounts is a bust. I'm getting the same feeling from Curry, he's too one dimensional. If his shot isn't falling, he's useless because he can't do anything else. He's sorta like a player we already have on the roster: Juan Dixon.

And just to drop another name: Morris Almond. CCJ was hyping this guy to death, excellent scorer in college, etc etc. Again...he could score, but he does nothing else. Same thing with Curry. It's fun watching this guy score, but when you really break down his game, most of his contributions would come on the offensive side, and the Wizards do not need that. It's hard to gauge what kind of value this guy would bring since he's option A-Z on the offensive side for Davidson. I'm always weary about kids who put up big numbers in small schools, i.e. the aforementioned Morris Almond.

Just my two cents. I don't get the hype around Curry, I'm sure he'll provide instant offense and a boost to ticket sales for the Bobcats (I'm pretty sure MJ has set his sights on this guy, its too obvious).
Bickerstaff: who's up for kickball?!!
Ed Wood: Only if it's the no-pants variety.
WizarDynasty
Veteran
Posts: 2,535
And1: 192
Joined: Oct 23, 2003

Re: The RealGM Wizards Board Draft Thread 2008/2009 

Post#649 » by WizarDynasty » Sun Feb 15, 2009 10:14 pm

you are not going to find two way players who are above average on both sides of the ball in free agency and teams normally don't trade these guys unless there is really something wrong with them.
The only way you find a two way player with great worth ethic..is in the draft. There is a reason teams traded both jamison and butler. Neither player is an above average two way player. It would be nice to figure out which players in the draft will turn out to be above average two way players. Above average on offense and an above average man to man defender with a great work ethic. These players almost never exist in free agency, and you almost never see a team trade a player like this in his prime.
So you best bet is to get him in the draft. This team needs one at the s/f position let's just hope we get him.
Build your team with five shooters using Paul Pierce Form deeply bent hips and lower back arch at same time. before rising into shot. Elbow not pointing to the ground! } Avdija=young Paul Pierce
go'stags
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,601
And1: 29
Joined: Aug 01, 2004

Re: The RealGM Wizards Board Draft Thread 2008/2009 

Post#650 » by go'stags » Sun Feb 15, 2009 10:41 pm

I don't think Chad Ford should ever be cited in this thread. It doesnt help your argument.
LyricalRico wrote:
Speaking of giant penises, what's up with Bobby Simmons?.

Return to Washington Wizards