Patrick Beverley Refuses To Answer Questions From Reporters Not Subscribed To His Podcast

[RealGM Wiretap]

Milwaukee Bucks guard Patrick Beverley refused to allow an ESPN producer to be a part of postgame interviews following the Bucks season-ending loss to the Indiana Pacers on Thursday. Beverley asked producer Malinda Adams if she was subscribed to his podcast. When Adams said she was not, Beverley said "You can't interview me then."

As another reporter asked Beverley a question, the Bucks guard asked Adams to leave the interview circle entirely. Beverley again stated that Adams couldn't be a part of the interview because she's not subscribed to his podcast.

Other local reporters shared that this behavior is nothing new for Beverley. He's apparently taken the same stance with others since his arrival in Milwaukee following the trade deadline.

Via Alex Golden/Setting the Pace Podcast

[ChaiSudle]

This guy is a CLOWN. Such an average player with such a massive ego.

[TheCage4]

It will be such a joy when this child is out of the league.

[Meeksology]

I hope all his subs started unsubscribing to him after this. What a spoiled brat.

[Tom White]

This guy is an absolute jackass.

[Lockdown504090]

if he didnt have the pod, would they want to talk to him? i wonder.

[elmdawgg69]

She could’ve literally taken out her phone and subscribed right then and there. It takes 20 seconds and is free.

[foreigngrammar]

This guy
Who would listen to such an idiot in the first place!?

Needs to be kicked out of the league or in the guts.

[kenwood3333]

Smart way for him to market himself. Now people are curious what is in his podcast.

[madmaxmedia]

She could’ve literally taken out her phone and subscribed right then and there. It takes 20 seconds and is free.

It would have been funny if she did that, got her question answered, then pulled out her phone and unsubscribed.

[TimeisIllmatic]

He's controlling the narrative instead of letting the media do so. Not mad at that.

[BlzMwt]

He's controlling the narrative instead of letting the media do so. Not mad at that.

What a bad take.

It's his job to talk to the media.

And he's not controlling any narrative. Someone could still talk poorly about him despite being subscribed to his pod. It's not some barrier that's protecting him.

He's just a manipulative piece of garbage

[TimeisIllmatic]

He's controlling the narrative instead of letting the media do so. Not mad at that.

What a bad take.

It's his job to talk to the media.

And he's not controlling any narrative. Someone could still talk poorly about him despite being subscribed to his pod. It's not some barrier that's protecting him.

He's just a manipulative piece of garbage

I'm saying instead of him giving the media comments that they can twist (like usual) he can explain his side of the story on his own platform all while promoting his own pod.

You can like or dislike him, I personally don't care, but from a business perspective it makes sense.

[beefymajesto]

He's controlling the narrative instead of letting the media do so. Not mad at that.

What a bad take.

It's his job to talk to the media.

And he's not controlling any narrative. Someone could still talk poorly about him despite being subscribed to his pod. It's not some barrier that's protecting him.

He's just a manipulative piece of garbage

I'm saying instead of him giving the media comments that they can twist (like usual) he can explain his side of the story on his own platform all while promoting his own pod.

You can like or dislike him, I personally don't care, but from a business perspective it makes sense.

I think you missed his point. Bev refusing to talk to reporters not subscribed doesn't affect that. He's still giving comments to the media, he can still spurt his own **** online, hes just trolling for followers.