OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
Moderators: kdawg32086, magik9113
Re: OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
-
- Freshman
- Posts: 62
- And1: 71
- Joined: Oct 06, 2013
Re: OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
I would say for the next 30 years about close to get in to top 10.
Football(yes the sport you play with your feet but you call Soccer) is the number 1 sport in so many countries in the world and have been in some for over 80 years. This is not about population( i would know from Iceland and a soccer coach) but of course it can help. Soccer is not about being athletic it is more about teamwork, will to sacrifice for your team, skills, structure and game IQ.
Soccer is in the culture and is a religion in many countries and i am not sure it would be like that in USA.
I think USA could have a great team but when people say right away they would be number 1 that is both arrogant and tells me the lack of knowledge that would keep you from being number 1.
p.s USA Basketball is Number 1 in the World
Football(yes the sport you play with your feet but you call Soccer) is the number 1 sport in so many countries in the world and have been in some for over 80 years. This is not about population( i would know from Iceland and a soccer coach) but of course it can help. Soccer is not about being athletic it is more about teamwork, will to sacrifice for your team, skills, structure and game IQ.
Soccer is in the culture and is a religion in many countries and i am not sure it would be like that in USA.
I think USA could have a great team but when people say right away they would be number 1 that is both arrogant and tells me the lack of knowledge that would keep you from being number 1.
p.s USA Basketball is Number 1 in the World
Re: OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,279
- And1: 1,378
- Joined: Mar 30, 2017
Re: OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
dosun wrote:JunkYardDog6ix wrote:Oscar9992 wrote:I am sure USA, Canada or Russia will never produce players caliebers of today's Ronaldo & Messi. Not even players close to their level.
Lol okay buddy , this is wrong.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andriy_Shevchenko
Shevchenko is Ukrainian (Russia and Ukraine are not the same country) and say he was at Cristiano Ronaldo and Messi level is a huge reach, he was good but not that good.
I am aware it is not the same country lol. It is the same region of people and he was born in the Soviet Union. Regardless, the statement that a legendary player cannot come from a Northern country is absurd and I'm not going to debate it.
Re: OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,324
- And1: 1,537
- Joined: Apr 07, 2016
Re: OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
Illmatic12 wrote:Xherdan 23 wrote:UcanUwill wrote:
Not buying it. Indians maybe, but what is wrong with Russians or Americans?
Considering all the youth programs and leagues in USA, its kinda strange seeing no phenoms appear at all in the States. But I guess its not all that bad, compared to my country Lithuania, we have zero organization in a matter, no elementary school leagues or anything like that, no one plays organized Soccer at all here it seems. We have no talent at all, tolerable keepers and CB here and there just because they are tall and strong, but no skill at sight.
Compared to Lithuania, America is so much ahead of the game at organizing sport leagues from elementary level, Its kinda amazing that we can play Basketball at a level we do.
Chrisitan Pulisic?
Pulisic trained in Germany from a young age.
Which is simple proof that the US does actually have a large potential pool of talented players, what’s lacking is the infrastructure and coaching for them to develop. Other countries are waaay ahead of America in that regard.
16 isn't that young, he was already starting at 17 for Dortmund and USMNT. He was also the youngest ever CL player, he was already a developed talent before he moved to Germany.
I agree with your second paragraph in general but I think it's more about tradition than anything else at this point - soccer doesn't seem to be a sport most great young American athletes consider, especially compared to basketball, baseball and football.
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in practice, there is.
- Jan L. A. van de Snepscheut
- Jan L. A. van de Snepscheut
Re: OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
- AdagioPace
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,768
- And1: 7,254
- Joined: Jan 03, 2017
- Location: Contado di Molise
Re: OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
ignorance over 9000. Spain and italy poor countries? . Even if they are poorer than germany, you put them with argentina!!Danny1616 wrote:Oscar9992 wrote:Genetics are big part of being good in Soccer... Northern Countries will never be good enough in Soccer.
Brazilians, Argentinians, Spaniards, Germans etc. are always be a top Soccer countries, as they have 'genetics' to play it very well.
Chinese, Indians, Scandinavians, Northern Americans, Russians, most of Brits & White French etc. will never play soccer very well with few exceptions.
What?
Germany is a pretty 'northern' country. Britain has always been pretty good in soccer.
I think it's more the fact that in poorer countries such as Spain, Argentina, Italy and Brazil soccer is the easiest sport to play. You don't need to buy a basketball net, have a baseball field, purchase equipment like football and hockey.
All you need is a ball.
That is why those countries produce excellent soccer and track athletes...because they are literally the only sports the population grow up competing in.
"La natura gode della natura; la natura trionfa sulla natura; la natura domina la natura" - Ostanes
Re: OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,668
- And1: 2,344
- Joined: Mar 11, 2015
Re: OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
Is there any good training available in the states, relative to the top countries? How do you know who is qualified?
I'd like to put my kid into soccer when he's older, but I know zip about soccer and don't want to be swindled.
I'd like to put my kid into soccer when he's older, but I know zip about soccer and don't want to be swindled.
FGA Restricted All-Time Draft
In My Hood, The Bullies Get Bullied
PG: 2013 Mike Conley, 1998 Greg Anthony
SG: 2005 Manu Ginobili, 2015 Khris Middleton
SF: 1991 Scottie Pippen
PF: 1986 Larry Bird, 1996 Dennis Rodman
C: 1999 Alonzo Mourning
In My Hood, The Bullies Get Bullied
PG: 2013 Mike Conley, 1998 Greg Anthony
SG: 2005 Manu Ginobili, 2015 Khris Middleton
SF: 1991 Scottie Pippen
PF: 1986 Larry Bird, 1996 Dennis Rodman
C: 1999 Alonzo Mourning
Re: OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
- The Penguin
- "Beat The Commish" Champion/Mr. Clean Slate
- Posts: 7,263
- And1: 4,107
- Joined: Nov 17, 2006
- Location: Columbus
Re: OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
Xherdan 23 wrote:Illmatic12 wrote:Xherdan 23 wrote:
Chrisitan Pulisic?
Pulisic trained in Germany from a young age.
Which is simple proof that the US does actually have a large potential pool of talented players, what’s lacking is the infrastructure and coaching for them to develop. Other countries are waaay ahead of America in that regard.
16 isn't that young, he was already starting at 17 for Dortmund and USMNT. He was also the youngest ever CL player, he was already a developed talent before he moved to Germany.
I agree with your second paragraph in general but I think it's more about tradition than anything else at this point - soccer doesn't seem to be a sport most great young American athletes consider, especially compared to basketball, baseball and football.
It's walking on eggshells, but bottom line the guys who end up playing for the USMNT and the kids who play soccer a lot don't look like the guys who end up playing in the NFL or NBA. Different sports are emphasized in different communities.
Re: OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,324
- And1: 1,537
- Joined: Apr 07, 2016
Re: OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
Oscar9992 wrote:Xherdan 23 wrote:Oscar9992 wrote:
Pulisic joined Borussia Dortmund at age of 16... And rightfully did so. He would be ruined staying in US & waiting to get drafted to MLS clubs.
Age 16 is not when clubs start to develop players, he was already a top prospect developed in America and he would've been great wherever he went.
But I'm not sure discussing this with a person that thinks "USA players don't have the genetics" for football is a smart thing to do
If he continue to play in highschool, college or whatever in USA, he wouldn't be player he is today. He did right thing joining Borussia at 16. North American system doesn't work in soccer at all.
Also, Chinese & Indians will never produce any elite player no matter how hard they try & how much population they have. They don't have the 'right genetics'.
This is both racist and stupid.
Koreans have a better genetic pool in your expert's opinion? Because Son is absoloutly elite.
Also, is there a reason USA has amazing athletes in basketball, baseball, football, running ect but not in soccer? How does that work for genetics?
As for "Northern countries" not having good genetics, can you explain the difference between Germans and Brits/white french?
Also how are Scandinavians Like Zlatan or Henrick Larsson fit your race theory?
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in practice, there is.
- Jan L. A. van de Snepscheut
- Jan L. A. van de Snepscheut
Re: OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,167
- And1: 2,980
- Joined: Mar 21, 2017
Re: OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
Also, people arguing what I've said...
Soccer is the most popular sport in Russia, but they are much better in hockey than in soccer. They actually produce a lot of Elite Level Hockey players but almost never soccer players. It says a lot. They are just don't meant to play soccer.
Soccer is the most popular sport in Russia, but they are much better in hockey than in soccer. They actually produce a lot of Elite Level Hockey players but almost never soccer players. It says a lot. They are just don't meant to play soccer.
Re: OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,167
- And1: 2,980
- Joined: Mar 21, 2017
Re: OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
Xherdan 23 wrote:
This is both racist and stupid.
Koreans have a better genetic pool in your expert's opinion? Because Son is absoloutly elite.
Also, is there a reason USA has amazing athletes in basketball, baseball, football, running ect but not in soccer? How does that work for genetics?
As for "Northern countries" not having good genetics, can you explain the difference between Germans and Brits/white french?
Also how are Scandinavians Like Zlatan or Henrick Larsson fit your race theory?
Zlatan is half Croat, hald Bosnian... Larsson is a half African.
Re: OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,633
- And1: 6,395
- Joined: Dec 23, 2003
Re: OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
I’m just laughing at the notion that 5 foot nuthin Messi is genetically gifted.
Re: OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,690
- And1: 12,725
- Joined: May 26, 2007
Re: OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
AdagioPace wrote:ignorance over 9000. Spain and italy poor countries? . Even if they are poorer than germany, you put them with argentina!!Danny1616 wrote:Oscar9992 wrote:Genetics are big part of being good in Soccer... Northern Countries will never be good enough in Soccer.
Brazilians, Argentinians, Spaniards, Germans etc. are always be a top Soccer countries, as they have 'genetics' to play it very well.
Chinese, Indians, Scandinavians, Northern Americans, Russians, most of Brits & White French etc. will never play soccer very well with few exceptions.
What?
Germany is a pretty 'northern' country. Britain has always been pretty good in soccer.
I think it's more the fact that in poorer countries such as Spain, Argentina, Italy and Brazil soccer is the easiest sport to play. You don't need to buy a basketball net, have a baseball field, purchase equipment like football and hockey.
All you need is a ball.
That is why those countries produce excellent soccer and track athletes...because they are literally the only sports the population grow up competing in.
I said relatively.
Spain and Italy are poorer compared to Germany.
I never stated those countries were poor, I said "poorer" when compared to northern countries.
Re: OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,167
- And1: 2,980
- Joined: Mar 21, 2017
Re: OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
gst8 wrote:I’m just laughing at the notion that 5 foot nuthin Messi is genetically gifted.
Messi is meant to play soccer as he is Argentinian of Italian & Spanish descent, & technically perfect but he had issues when he was a kid as he was diagnosed with a growth hormone deficiency.
Re: OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,212
- And1: 2,781
- Joined: May 29, 2011
Re: OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
Oscar9992 wrote:Xherdan 23 wrote:
This is both racist and stupid.
Koreans have a better genetic pool in your expert's opinion? Because Son is absoloutly elite.
Also, is there a reason USA has amazing athletes in basketball, baseball, football, running ect but not in soccer? How does that work for genetics?
As for "Northern countries" not having good genetics, can you explain the difference between Germans and Brits/white french?
Also how are Scandinavians Like Zlatan or Henrick Larsson fit your race theory?
Zlatan is half Croat, hald Bosnian... Larsson is a half African.
Northern countries like Germany, Netherlands and England will never be good at soccer.
Re: OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,324
- And1: 1,537
- Joined: Apr 07, 2016
Re: OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
Oscar9992 wrote:Xherdan 23 wrote:
This is both racist and stupid.
Koreans have a better genetic pool in your expert's opinion? Because Son is absoloutly elite.
Also, is there a reason USA has amazing athletes in basketball, baseball, football, running ect but not in soccer? How does that work for genetics?
As for "Northern countries" not having good genetics, can you explain the difference between Germans and Brits/white french?
Also how are Scandinavians Like Zlatan or Henrick Larsson fit your race theory?
Zlatan is half Croat, hald Bosnian... Larsson is a half African.
These two are still Baltic, what's the genetic difference?
Also, good job avoiding everything else I talked about (Son, elite US athletes in every other sport, difference between Western European countries...).
You seem to be extremely poorly educated about how genetics work. LOL at you thinking Messi or Iniesta are genetically superior to Steven Gerrard or Michael Owen.
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in practice, there is.
- Jan L. A. van de Snepscheut
- Jan L. A. van de Snepscheut
Re: OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,726
- And1: 6,153
- Joined: Nov 08, 2017
Re: OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
JunkYardDog6ix wrote:Oscar9992 wrote:I am sure USA, Canada or Russia will never produce players caliebers of today's Ronaldo & Messi. Not even players close to their level.
Lol okay buddy , this is wrong.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andriy_Shevchenko
lol what? Shevchenko was a great player, one of the best strikers of his generation but please he isn't anywhere on the same level as Messi.... Messi is once in a lieftime player. Shevchenko wasn't even best striker of his generation ffs.
Re: OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,726
- And1: 6,153
- Joined: Nov 08, 2017
Re: OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
I think if soccer was No1 sport in US, then they would be on similar level as France...not the best team but just a tier below the best. If it was No1 sport, then there would have obviously been lot more focus on youth level and grass roots, which is the biggest problem US Soccer has currently.
Re: OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
-
- Senior
- Posts: 657
- And1: 942
- Joined: Mar 03, 2016
Re: OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
gst8 wrote:I’m just laughing at the notion that 5 foot nuthin Messi is genetically gifted.
Or France's Antoine Griezmann, Spain's Andres Iniesta...
What is often overlooked in evaluating athleticism / ability required to play football is coordination. Neither of the players listed above is a gifted athlete in the sense that they can run and jump out of the building. But they possess great balance and coordination and on top of that great football IQ. So I don't buy the argument that the US would automatically be an elite nation if let's say the Russell Westbrooks picked up football instead of basketball.
Xherdan 23 wrote:These two are still Baltic, what's the genetic difference?
Neither of those two countries are Baltic...
Re: OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,167
- And1: 2,980
- Joined: Mar 21, 2017
Re: OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
Xherdan 23 wrote:Oscar9992 wrote:
Zlatan is half Croat, hald Bosnian... Larsson is a half African.
These two are still Baltic, what's the genetic difference?
Also, good job avoiding everything else I talked about (Son, elite US athletes in every other sport, difference between Western European countries...).
You seem to be extremely poorly educated about how genetics work. LOL at you thinking Messi or Iniesta are genetically superior to Steven Gerrard or Michael Owen.
They are Balkan not Baltic, poorly educated here is you.
Gerrard & Owen never had technique any close to Messi & Iniesta & ethic background is the main reason here.
Re: OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
-
- Senior
- Posts: 657
- And1: 942
- Joined: Mar 03, 2016
Re: OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
Oscar9992 wrote:Gerrard & Owen never had technique any close to Messi & Iniesta & ethic background is the main reason here.
That's bull. It's the culture of the football education they received and not ethnic background.
Re: OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
- UcanUwill
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,747
- And1: 29,193
- Joined: Aug 07, 2011
Re: OT: If soccer was the #1 sport in USA
Oscar9992 wrote:Also, people arguing what I've said...
Soccer is the most popular sport in Russia, but they are much better in hockey than in soccer. They actually produce a lot of Elite Level Hockey players but almost never soccer players. It says a lot. They are just don't meant to play soccer.
So what makes Russian genetically inferior?
To begin with, Hockey is very popular in Russia, and competition in Hockey is far inferior, compared to Soccer. Most countries play Soccer and do it very well, and just a bunch of countries play Hockey. Thats main reason why Russians appear stronger in that sport.
Main reason why Russian Soccer is not on elite level, is the fact that country is very politically and culturally secluded and self reliant. They almost never export talent, and their programs are just not as rich as top European programs. Almost all of their national team players are from domestic leagues all the time. Russia is just like USA, in a sense that their domestic culture is so rich, no one really ever want to migrate.