Moderators: infinite11285, Domejandro, Harry Garris, ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, zimpy27, bwgood77, cupcakesnake
BeiBeau wrote:MoneyTalks41890 wrote:durden_tyler wrote:Washington and Hardaway sustained their good scoring run in Game 3. Feels sustainable for the next 2-3 games you think? LOL
You know you are allowed to not be a douche on the internet. It’s not a requirement I promise.
Should mods be on here calling someone a douche? Thunder fans need to grow up as much as their team does.
BeiBeau wrote:MoneyTalks41890 wrote:durden_tyler wrote:Washington and Hardaway sustained their good scoring run in Game 3. Feels sustainable for the next 2-3 games you think? LOL
You know you are allowed to not be a douche on the internet. It’s not a requirement I promise.
Should mods be on here calling someone a douche? Thunder fans need to grow up as much as their team does.
Forbes wrote:Tough series. They still have time but if they’re eliminated they did just gain a ton of experience. They’ll be right back here next year and wiser.
MoneyTalks41890 wrote:BeiBeau wrote:MoneyTalks41890 wrote:
You know you are allowed to not be a douche on the internet. It’s not a requirement I promise.
Should mods be on here calling someone a douche? Thunder fans need to grow up as much as their team does.
I didn’t call anyone anything I was simply advising him of his rights vis a vis the internet. It’s something lots of folks should ponder.
BmanInBigD wrote:BeiBeau wrote:MoneyTalks41890 wrote:
You know you are allowed to not be a douche on the internet. It’s not a requirement I promise.
Should mods be on here calling someone a douche? Thunder fans need to grow up as much as their team does.
Trust me. Mods can do whatever they want on here. Kinda sickening, actually.
MoneyTalks41890 wrote:BeiBeau wrote:MoneyTalks41890 wrote:
You know you are allowed to not be a douche on the internet. It’s not a requirement I promise.
Should mods be on here calling someone a douche? Thunder fans need to grow up as much as their team does.
I didn’t call anyone anything I was simply advising him of his rights vis a vis the internet. It’s something lots of folks should ponder.
MFT5 wrote:MoneyTalks41890 wrote:BeiBeau wrote:
Should mods be on here calling someone a douche? Thunder fans need to grow up as much as their team does.
I didn’t call anyone anything I was simply advising him of his rights vis a vis the internet. It’s something lots of folks should ponder.
yu are definitely allowed to not be a weirdo on the internet but unfortunately everyone isn’t capable of class i guess those ppl are more money talk than moral
thunder fans are definitely bottom of the barrel trash hopefully we only have to hear from them for 2 more games
MoneyTalks41890 wrote:MFT5 wrote:MoneyTalks41890 wrote:
I didn’t call anyone anything I was simply advising him of his rights vis a vis the internet. It’s something lots of folks should ponder.
yu are definitely allowed to not be a weirdo on the internet but unfortunately everyone isn’t capable of class i guess those ppl are more money talk than moral
thunder fans are definitely bottom of the barrel trash hopefully we only have to hear from them for 2 more games
Another shining example of someone in need of this education.
Obviously not at confident as I wasPapi_swav wrote:WestbrookGOATed wrote:I do. Dallas gets one at home and OKC finishes it off at home in game 5. I don't see the Mavs, or anyone really, beating the Thunder at home.Papi_swav wrote:So you think OKC beats Dallas 4-1?
interested in how you feel now.?
I'm still taking OKC at home in 7 but I won't be surprised if Dallas wins in 6.
ChipotleWest wrote:If OKC loses this series SGA will get a pass along with his teammates who are "young" but he's actually six months older than Luka, and yet hasn't taken near the criticism Luka has over the years. Mavs fans had to hear how the Clippers owned Luka (who was 21) when Porzingis was either injured or coming up small, Brunson was a pup, and they started Boban. Luka was being guarded by prime Kawhi and was fantastic against them both times, but he couldn't beat them by himself. Took it to 6 and then 7 games though. Mavs were up 3-2 in the second series and they lost at home by 7, if Porzingis gave more than 7 points, well do the math.
DoctorX wrote:ChipotleWest wrote:If OKC loses this series SGA will get a pass along with his teammates who are "young" but he's actually six months older than Luka, and yet hasn't taken near the criticism Luka has over the years. Mavs fans had to hear how the Clippers owned Luka (who was 21) when Porzingis was either injured or coming up small, Brunson was a pup, and they started Boban. Luka was being guarded by prime Kawhi and was fantastic against them both times, but he couldn't beat them by himself. Took it to 6 and then 7 games though. Mavs were up 3-2 in the second series and they lost at home by 7, if Porzingis gave more than 7 points, well do the math.
Agreed. The main reason why I picked the Mavs to beat the Clippers this year is that in the past two times they played Luka they barely beat him. I always felt if Luka just had a little bit more help, he would have beaten the Clippers in those past 2 matchups. I felt going into the series this year they would beat the Clippers with the addition of having Kyrie who is a legit star who historically comes up big in the playoffs.
ChipotleWest wrote:If OKC loses this series SGA will get a pass along with his teammates who are "young" but he's actually six months older than Luka, and yet hasn't taken near the criticism Luka has over the years. Mavs fans had to hear how the Clippers owned Luka (who was 21) when Porzingis was either injured or coming up small, Brunson was a pup, and they started Boban. Luka was being guarded by prime Kawhi and was fantastic against them both times, but he couldn't beat them by himself. Took it to 6 and then 7 games though. Mavs were up 3-2 in the second series and they lost at home by 7, if Porzingis gave more than 7 points, well do the math.
ForeverTFC wrote:ChipotleWest wrote:If OKC loses this series SGA will get a pass along with his teammates who are "young" but he's actually six months older than Luka, and yet hasn't taken near the criticism Luka has over the years. Mavs fans had to hear how the Clippers owned Luka (who was 21) when Porzingis was either injured or coming up small, Brunson was a pup, and they started Boban. Luka was being guarded by prime Kawhi and was fantastic against them both times, but he couldn't beat them by himself. Took it to 6 and then 7 games though. Mavs were up 3-2 in the second series and they lost at home by 7, if Porzingis gave more than 7 points, well do the math.
Who blames Luka? All the noise regarding Luka is that the Mavs haven’t been able to put a good team around him. He’s been regarded as a top 5 player for years now and often near top of the MVP ladder even though his team record is never enough. His 2 series against Kawhi are remembered very positively when it comes to his legacy. And for a player that whines and flops as much as he does, he’s extremely well liked by fans, including me.
The SGA hate is a little weird to be honest. He’s another likeable star, just like Luka.
og15 wrote:DoctorX wrote:ChipotleWest wrote:If OKC loses this series SGA will get a pass along with his teammates who are "young" but he's actually six months older than Luka, and yet hasn't taken near the criticism Luka has over the years. Mavs fans had to hear how the Clippers owned Luka (who was 21) when Porzingis was either injured or coming up small, Brunson was a pup, and they started Boban. Luka was being guarded by prime Kawhi and was fantastic against them both times, but he couldn't beat them by himself. Took it to 6 and then 7 games though. Mavs were up 3-2 in the second series and they lost at home by 7, if Porzingis gave more than 7 points, well do the math.
Agreed. The main reason why I picked the Mavs to beat the Clippers this year is that in the past two times they played Luka they barely beat him. I always felt if Luka just had a little bit more help, he would have beaten the Clippers in those past 2 matchups. I felt going into the series this year they would beat the Clippers with the addition of having Kyrie who is a legit star who historically comes up big in the playoffs.
Us knowing Kawhi would not be healthy going into the series kind of helps that prediction too. Not like the Mavs would have lost either of those two times either if Kawhi didn't play.
Despite Harden's age, Clippers also didn't have anyone his caliber as the third guy hen they previously met up.
Mavs are definitely better, but them beating the Clippers this season says little about how well they would have done against a Clippers with healthy Kawhi.
Johnny Bball wrote:They should have been trading picks at the deadline to add talent and experience, and not wasting their tradable salary/cap space on Hayward. Said it more than once, will say it again.
