Lalouie wrote:okc is barely keeping up with a mavs w/o healthy luka
Injured or not. Mavs have two superstars who are clutch
That’s a big difference compared to Lakers who relies on 39 year old Bron cuz AD can’t takeover consistently
Moderators: infinite11285, Domejandro, Harry Garris, ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, zimpy27, bwgood77, cupcakesnake
Lalouie wrote:okc is barely keeping up with a mavs w/o healthy luka
KyRo23 wrote:Maybe, but who cares?
TheNG wrote:KyRo23 wrote:Maybe, but who cares?
I will explain to you.
If the answer is yes, it means the Lakers suck because they made a mistake not to lose in the first play in series.
If the answer is no, it means they can't give excuses about how they lost in the 1st round only because it was the Nuggets. So it also means the Lakers suck.
So when you say "maybe" it means you are not sure between "yes" and "no", meaning you practically agree the Lakers suck but just not sure about the specific reason.
JustBuzzin wrote:Easily.
Chet is BBQ Chicken for AD.
Dr Aki wrote:Dominator83 wrote:Yes. Should have tanked that 1st play-in
Might have lost to the Kings, who the Lakers were swept by this season
Lakers were 3-1 against OKC this season, they simply did not have the big boys inside to stop AD and Lebron
jus a fan wrote:Can't Beat OKC if Sac beats you in Play in.
Why cant Laker and even non Laker Fans realize. If they lose the first Play-in game. They would be the underdog to Sac
Sac was 4-0 this year vs them.
Sabonis ownes AD. 10-0.
Sent from my SM-S918U using RealGM mobile app
slick_watts wrote:no. why are the thunder getting so underrated on this board?
dockingsched wrote:I don’t think anyone in that Thunder/Dallas matchup is beating Denver/Minny/LAL
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor