That Nicka wrote:I dont get why people say we wouldnt have gotten Pau if Bynum didnt get injured... Why wouldnt we? Wallace wanted an expiring, and the Lakers had that... I think any team in any situation would trade Kwame for Pau in a heartbeat
the idea that the lakers wouldn't have traded for pau without bynum's injury isn't completely unfounded. the lakers believed that with bynum's emergence they were already good enough to compete.
"Three weeks ago, we would not have made a deal," Kupchak said by phone. "But when Andrew went down, we didn't want to give away eight weeks. Lo and behold, Pau was available." - Mitch Kupchak
Had Bynum never been injured, the Lakers might not have felt the need to make the trade. Gasol gave the Lakers a much-needed second option behind Kobe Bryant and lifted them into championship contention.
“I don’t know if we would have gotten here,” Kupchak said.
the only down side to trading kwame/picks for pau is his contract. what those comments tell me is that the dr. buss isn't as prepared to pay the future huge price tag that people automatically assume he will.