DowJones wrote:GrandTheftRondo wrote:DowJones wrote:
He needs to convince himself that Boston really is THAT good, and the only way to do that after watching the C's in round 2 is to believe that the Zinger is anything other than a really nice role player. Instead Boston is a good team, but not dominant. They certainly aren't that 64-win team they thought they re the regular season.
No I just happen to know what I’m talking about because I watched the team all year.
Porzingis makes this team far more potent offensively.
Did you even watch the game tonight?
If the Celtics relied on 37 year old Al Horford all season they wouldn’t have sniffed 64 wins in the regular season.
Clueless **** post.
You are talking about the regular season as if it matters. It doesn't. The Zinger is a really nice player, and Boston would be better with him, but Cleveland was missing Mitchell and Allen tonight. Allen, at worst, is equal to Zinger. The Heat were without Butler, Rozier, and had 50% of Duncan Robinson. Stop trying to make the Zinger out to be someone he isn't. He aint that guy.
All I’m saying is that with the way this team is constructed, Porzingis is very important and a ceiling raiser.
Horford is close to toast offensively when required to play heavy minutes.
Porzingis’ shooting and size provides an offensive threat that opens up the offence for Tatum, Brown etc.
If Porzingis wasn’t there all season, the Celtics would have had far more close games in the regular season and nowhere near as dominant, just like in this series. Not a difficult concept to understand.
I’m also not sure how many more times we have to watch one of Garland/Mitchell missing and/or Allen/Mobley and watch the other guys play better to realise that the Cavs when healthy are a horrible mix.