HotelVitale wrote:zero rings wrote:AleksandarN wrote:This is not a mediocre team just stop it. AG is one of the best role players in the game. MPJ is a great shooter. KCP is a good role player who is the best in the nba at navigating screens. Jamal is a good to great number two. He just lacks consistency. Jokic is the best player in the nba and truly a transcendent player. He had the best pieces around him to make use of the best bbiq the game has seen in my opinion. But his team is not mediocre.
Was AG one of the best role players in the game before Jokic was diming him up every night? No. His lack of outside shooting would make him a liability on a lot of teams.
MPJ is a great shooter with size and a truly elite role player IMO. To me he's the second most important Nugget and would be a great fit on any team.
KCP is fine for what he is, but largely replaceable. Sucks that he's not making his shots right now.
As for Murray, he is pretty far from being a great number two. You say he just lacks consistency, as if that isn't a big deal lol. This isn't a Paul George or Scottie Pippen type player who is always bringing elite defense to the table. If Murray isn't making all those tough pullup jumpers, he's a liability. I'd wager there's at least 10 guards in the league who would be strict upgrades, and probably another 10 who could fill in with no noticeable drop off.
Everyone else on the team is replacement level or worse.
Well even when you're trying to play it down your description is of a really nice team, not a 'mediocre' one. You don't actually think this supporting cast is weak and it seems like a bad strategy to argue against it being 'great' by saying the worst thing you can about each player.
Before being on the Nuggets, AG was definitely not a 'liability' and was viewed as a very talented player who was overmatched as a #1-#2. Murray has been ridiculous many times when it's mattered most, his inconsistency and half disappearing periods are part of his story but so are all his very good performances in the PO. You're either trolling or missing something huge if you think there are really 20 guards who could slot right in and do what Murray does in the PO.
It's not an elite cast of guys, not on its own. But it's a very strong supporting cast of smart and talented players who play their parts really well, that's the obvious take and the first thing we should all be starting from. It woujldn't be great without Jokic of course but it's also really really good for him. We all agree with that, can parse out the subtleties from there.
I stand by what I said. This supporting cast is absolutely mediocre for a team trying to repeat. Yes they have some solid players who can play their roles well, but that’s true for almost every team in the league. Even the bad teams have solid pros on them who could contribute in the right situation.
To me a strong supporting cast is a team that could win close to half their games without the superstar. Based on what we’ve seen over the past 4 years, I doubt the Nuggets would win even 30 games if you swapped Jokic with an average starting center. They don’t have a single player who raises the floor of the team without Jokic, which shows up in all the on/off data. They are terrible without him.
And I’m not trolling with Murray. The league is loaded with talent at the guard position and he isn’t anything special. Put him on the Hornets and we’re not talking about him at all. Put him on a team with a less consistent star than Jokic, and he’d come under major scrutiny for his erratic play. We’re 10 games into the playoffs now, and he’s rocking a 47% TS on 20 shots per game…
If he were Giannis or Embiid’s teammate he’d be getting eviscerated right now.