hundreth wrote:bledredwine wrote:hundreth wrote:
So your sample size is 1 game and a highlight reel?
This playoffs PER
Brunson - 23.1
ANT - 25.9
Better sample size? And ANT has been facing defending champions.
Not to take anything away from Ant but your reductionist and frankly strange way of evaluating these players is just plain wrong.
It's not- that's an excuse.
PER in the same era among similar players in as accurate as you can get when it comes to efficiency and volume, which
happen to be the strengths of these two players (offensive output). It just so happens that ANT is also a much better defender.
So you're right, there's another side to this, but for offense between these two in particular, PER is an important metric.
ANT is more efficient when it comes to his volume and it makes sense because he has
a much better post game/versatility.
ANT has been given constant attention by Denver. I can't say the same by Brunson, though he has certainly been the hero on his squad.