NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing

Moderators: KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, infinite11285, Harry Garris, ken6199, Dirk, bisme37

Does the NBA get the $75 billion TV money, not including streaming rights?

Yes and also additional $$$ for streaming
17
20%
Yes but WBD/TNT and Disney/ESPN get streaming rights
8
10%
No, but a multiple of the current $24 billion deal and a significant streaming deal
34
40%
No, about the same or a little bump
25
30%
 
Total votes: 84

nomansland
Head Coach
Posts: 6,325
And1: 4,666
Joined: Mar 02, 2013
   

Re: NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing 

Post#161 » by nomansland » Tue Mar 26, 2024 8:21 pm

BetYourCar24/7/365.com loves it. Get in the game!
wco81
RealGM
Posts: 22,263
And1: 9,318
Joined: Jul 04, 2013
       

Re: NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing 

Post#162 » by wco81 » Fri Apr 19, 2024 4:38 pm

So the exclusive negotiations window with ESPN and TNT is closing on Monday, with no new renewal.

The NBA's exclusive negotiating window with Disney and Warner Bros. Discovery expires on Monday and sources tell CNBC that it will likely pass without a deal.

Both Disney and WBD are in active talks with the NBA to keep games on ESPN and TNT.

The NBA would like to bring in at least one new partner to serve as a flagship streamer.



https://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/275392/NBAs-Exclusive-Negotiating-Window-With-ESPN-TNT-Likely-To-End-Monday-Without-New-Deal

This detail is interesting:

The NBA is looking to double the $24 billion it generated from its previous media rights deal with Disney and Warner Bros. Discovery by adding new partners and charging more for rights.


So a year or two ago, NBA said they wanted $80 billion for the next 10-year TV deal. That would be over 3 times the size of the current TV contract. They targeted 3X because the NFL also had received triple the value of their previous TV deal a couple of years ago.

Has the NBA accepted that they couldn't get a tripling of their TV deal, now setting their sights a lot lower?
Tor_Raps
RealGM
Posts: 25,478
And1: 38,280
Joined: Oct 14, 2018

Re: NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing 

Post#163 » by Tor_Raps » Fri Apr 19, 2024 4:44 pm

With all the previous load managing, hope these companies tell the nba to kick rocks. If they don't care about the regular season then why should the broadcasting company's pay an enormous amount? Just doesn't make sense.
User avatar
Hoop Hunter
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,409
And1: 1,482
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
   

Re: NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing 

Post#164 » by Hoop Hunter » Fri Apr 19, 2024 4:50 pm

I hate streaming, it never seems to works as well as my DirecTV and my DVR.
wco81
RealGM
Posts: 22,263
And1: 9,318
Joined: Jul 04, 2013
       

Re: NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing 

Post#165 » by wco81 » Fri Apr 19, 2024 4:51 pm

NBA represents dozens of hours per month for 6 months, overlapping with the NFL but also providing a lot of content after the NFL season ends.

The TV networks are making money because they're not going to rely on NHL and MLB only.

But ESPN and WBD are struggling since they signed the previous NBA contract, about 10 years ago.

We will see if new players like Amazon or Apple bid aggressively. I think the league is going to cut a deal to still be on cable TV, not go streaming only.
User avatar
pace31
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,464
And1: 2,371
Joined: Aug 27, 2007
     

Re: NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing 

Post#166 » by pace31 » Fri Apr 19, 2024 4:56 pm

wco81 wrote:NBA represents dozens of hours per month for 6 months, overlapping with the NFL but also providing a lot of content after the NFL season ends.

The TV networks are making money because they're not going to rely on NHL and MLB only.

But ESPN and WBD are struggling since they signed the previous NBA contract, about 10 years ago.

We will see if new players like Amazon or Apple bid aggressively. I think the league is going to cut a deal to still be on cable TV, not go streaming only.


I'd never expect it with something as mainstream as the NBA, but how Apple does their MLS league pass I think has been fantastic. An NBA version of that would be incredible.
bledredwine
RealGM
Posts: 12,422
And1: 4,045
Joined: Sep 17, 2010
   

Re: NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing 

Post#167 » by bledredwine » Fri Apr 19, 2024 5:05 pm

Lockdown504090 wrote:Plz let the deal fall through and nba end up Amazon primetv or YouTube.


This was the only desire and thought that I have in this debacle as well.
OP's post is excellent though.
https://undisputedgoat.medium.com/jordan-in-the-clutch-30f6e7ed4c43
LBJ clutch- 19 of 104 career: https://www.yardbarker.com/nba/articles/lebron_james_has_only_made_19_of_107_shots_in_clutch_situation_during_his_career_178_fg_125_from_3_pointers/s1_16751_38344895
User avatar
Chuck Everett
RealGM
Posts: 13,058
And1: 12,807
Joined: May 28, 2004
Location: Los Angeles
   

Re: NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing 

Post#168 » by Chuck Everett » Fri Apr 19, 2024 5:06 pm

wco81 wrote:NBA represents dozens of hours per month for 6 months, overlapping with the NFL but also providing a lot of content after the NFL season ends.

The TV networks are making money because they're not going to rely on NHL and MLB only.

But ESPN and WBD are struggling since they signed the previous NBA contract, about 10 years ago.

We will see if new players like Amazon or Apple bid aggressively. I think the league is going to cut a deal to still be on cable TV, not go streaming only.


The NBA's issue is that money is still expensive at the same time they would like to renew. Interest rates are still high, advertisers are still withholding a significant amount and a lot of these companies use debt to finance things in the short term.

Paramount/CBS re-upped with the NFL, but the scuttlebutt is that the company is possibly in danger of missing those payments (moving forward), while also trying to figure out how to sell itself to multiple interested parties (who seem to want to strip it for parts). The NFL hasn't said anything about this on the record, but privately, I am sure they are concerned about this.

Now, the 2023-24 season was a much better season for the NBA than the season prior. Last season was really bad as far as the product was concerned. The players still seem to not realize that they make their money from the regular season. The playoffs are important of course, but the national TV deals are valued by all of the regular season inventory. The League has tried to fix this by tying awards to games played, but even that has sparked complaining.

Lastly, Disney/ESPN and WBD are in a ton of debt. Disney due to the pandemic and WBD due to AT&T saddling the company with it before spinning it off. These companies may not be able to offer a raise even if they wanted to.

I think what we need to keep an eye on is if the NBA and its television partners seek to kick the can down the road by extending the current deal for an additional three (3) years in the hopes that the economic landscape improves. Comcast/NBC may bid, but they are definitely not going to overbid. Fox is not going to bid at all, choosing to invest in college sports instead (alongside the NFL).

That leaves Amazon, which has already rescued Bally, albeit temporarily. With the RSN's collapsing all around the country due to cord cutting, will the individual franchises (who don't have deals like MSG network and Spectrum), make individual deals with Amazon to broadcast locally? Or will this be the return to local network TV like Ishbia has done with the Suns this season?

I appreciate you bumping this thread. Always like hearing your thoughts on this.
"Kill 'em with Grindness."
wco81
RealGM
Posts: 22,263
And1: 9,318
Joined: Jul 04, 2013
       

Re: NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing 

Post#169 » by wco81 » Fri Apr 19, 2024 5:18 pm

The other consideration is that some teams have made certain payroll decisions expecting the cap to keep going up, with much more TV money increasing league revenues and driving salary cap increases.

Several teams may be on financially unsustainable paths unless the TV money really boosts revenues.

Live sports may be the only type of content preventing a much faster drop in cord-cutting. So the networks are damned if they do and damned if they don't.
Apz
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,941
And1: 2,003
Joined: Jan 18, 2019
   

Re: NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing 

Post#170 » by Apz » Fri Apr 19, 2024 5:46 pm

Will twolves owner regret not selling?
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 54,095
And1: 32,548
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing 

Post#171 » by jbk1234 » Fri Apr 19, 2024 5:53 pm

As the end consumer, I'd really like to see the numbers stay right where they are currently. When you start look at what these folks are going to have to charge in order for them to make a profit at 2 to 3 times the current rate, it ain't pretty.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
GameChannel
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,280
And1: 1,098
Joined: Apr 17, 2010

Re: NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing 

Post#172 » by GameChannel » Fri Apr 19, 2024 6:03 pm

If I was Google, I'd come in with a Youtube exclusive rights offer with NBA league pass getting abolished.

- Youtube gets ALL the games.
- No more league pass. No more ESPN, No more TNT.
- The local broadcasts continue to be carried by local stations on traditional TV, online streaming through Youtube only (free version with Ads)
- Marquee, National regular season games on Youtube premium subscription Ad Free.
- Playoffs on Youtube Premium subscription Ad Free.
- Buyout NBA on TNT's talent contracts to have them on Youtube for National, Marquee games on Tuesday and Thursdays plus payoffs.
wco81
RealGM
Posts: 22,263
And1: 9,318
Joined: Jul 04, 2013
       

Re: NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing 

Post#173 » by wco81 » Fri Apr 19, 2024 6:07 pm

jbk1234 wrote:As the end consumer, I'd really like to see the numbers stay right where they are currently. When you start look at what these folks are going to have to charge in order for them to make a profit at 2 to 3 times the current rate, it ain't pretty.


They could stop all NFL, NBA and other sports broadcasts tomorrow.

And the day after tomorrow, the cable companies and the streamers will still raise your subscription prices.

Certainly a lot of subscription revenues go to the leagues. But the leagues are also used as scapegoats when the cable companies raise your subscription fees every year.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 54,095
And1: 32,548
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing 

Post#174 » by jbk1234 » Fri Apr 19, 2024 6:47 pm

wco81 wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:As the end consumer, I'd really like to see the numbers stay right where they are currently. When you start look at what these folks are going to have to charge in order for them to make a profit at 2 to 3 times the current rate, it ain't pretty.


They could stop all NFL, NBA and other sports broadcasts tomorrow.

And the day after tomorrow, the cable companies and the streamers will still raise your subscription prices.

Certainly a lot of subscription revenues go to the leagues. But the leagues are also used as scapegoats when the cable companies raise your subscription fees every year.


I cut the cord so cable companies can do whatever they like before the entire carriage fee model implodes. Max is $10/month with commercials and they stream TNT. Disney is currently weighing whether to stream ESPN, hold onto its dwindling carriage fees in the cable model, try both, or just spin ESPN off and sell it.

But all of that aside, the idea that WB (TNT) and Disney (ESPN) would pay 3 times as much for the rights and not immediately try to pass that cost onto the consumer is pure fantasy. The dilemma they're facing is the possibility (likelihood) that not enough consumers would agree to pay those increased rates. Nationally televised games could quickly become a go out and watch at the pub event.

If the league is convinced the money they're looking for is out there, they already have a streaming service up and ready to go in NBA TV. They should cut out the middle man, end the rent seeking, and just collect the streaming fees themselves. I suspect that they're watching what happened to Ballys and other RSNs and deciding they don't want all that risk. In 2008 you had owners borrowing from the league to meet payroll. No one wants to go back to that.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Apz
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,941
And1: 2,003
Joined: Jan 18, 2019
   

Re: NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing 

Post#175 » by Apz » Fri Apr 19, 2024 8:12 pm

jbk1234 wrote:
wco81 wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:As the end consumer, I'd really like to see the numbers stay right where they are currently. When you start look at what these folks are going to have to charge in order for them to make a profit at 2 to 3 times the current rate, it ain't pretty.


They could stop all NFL, NBA and other sports broadcasts tomorrow.

And the day after tomorrow, the cable companies and the streamers will still raise your subscription prices.

Certainly a lot of subscription revenues go to the leagues. But the leagues are also used as scapegoats when the cable companies raise your subscription fees every year.


I cut the cord so cable companies can do whatever they like before the entire carriage fee model implodes. Max is $10/month with commercials and they stream TNT. Disney is currently weighing whether to stream ESPN, hold onto its dwindling carriage fees in the cable model, try both, or just spin ESPN off and sell it.

But all of that aside, the idea that WB (TNT) and Disney (ESPN) would pay 3 times as much for the rights and not immediately try to pass that cost onto the consumer is pure fantasy. The dilemma they're facing is the possibility (likelihood) that not enough consumers would agree to pay those increased rates. Nationally televised games could quickly become a go out and watch at the pub event.

If the league is convinced the money they're looking for is out there, they already have a streaming service up and ready to go in NBA TV. They should cut out the middle man, end the rent seeking, and just collect the streaming fees themselves. I suspect that they're watching what happened to Ballys and other RSNs and deciding they don't want all that risk. In 2008 you had owners borrowing from the league to meet payroll. No one wants to go back to that.


Agree. I were gonna stop paying for league pass cause it was like 200-220 euro/season, but just that year they lowered it to 99. **** adds up
dafan590
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,119
And1: 2,208
Joined: Jan 15, 2009

Re: NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing 

Post#176 » by dafan590 » Sat Apr 20, 2024 12:48 am

please bring back NBA ON NBC!!!
Slade3
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,621
And1: 808
Joined: Oct 27, 2009

Re: NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing 

Post#177 » by Slade3 » Sat Apr 20, 2024 4:25 am

sp6r=underrated wrote:The NBA will get the figure it wants. And if it leaves TNT/ESPN it will because it choose to leave.


The NBA needs ESPN/TNT more than they need the NBA. ESPN and TNT are just a small part of the empire that are Disney and WBD.. They'll both easily survive without the NBA. But the NBA will have a hard time doing the same without them. If the NBA gets too smug, both of them will just hang up the phone. The NBA can't contend with the two media giants, so they gotta negotiate carefully.
User avatar
MrBigShot
RealGM
Posts: 16,903
And1: 17,207
Joined: Dec 18, 2010
 

Re: NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing 

Post#178 » by MrBigShot » Sat Apr 20, 2024 4:34 am

They are intentionally looking for an unrealistic amount during the exclusive negotiation period to bring streaming into the mix and still overall get a higher total tv deal comp than the one before.
"They say you miss 100% of the shots you take" - Mike James
Mephariel
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,456
And1: 1,675
Joined: Jun 24, 2018
   

Re: NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing 

Post#179 » by Mephariel » Sat Apr 20, 2024 4:43 am

Slade3 wrote:
sp6r=underrated wrote:The NBA will get the figure it wants. And if it leaves TNT/ESPN it will because it choose to leave.


The NBA needs ESPN/TNT more than they need the NBA. ESPN and TNT are just a small part of the empire that are Disney and WBD.. They'll both easily survive without the NBA. But the NBA will have a hard time doing the same without them. If the NBA gets too smug, both of them will just hang up the phone. The NBA can't contend with the two media giants, so they gotta negotiate carefully.


I have no doubt the NBA will get the deal done and get what they want or most of what they want.
NBA4Lyfe
Veteran
Posts: 2,672
And1: 1,652
Joined: Mar 23, 2022
       

Re: NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing 

Post#180 » by NBA4Lyfe » Sat Apr 20, 2024 6:34 am

sp6r=underrated wrote:
celticfan42487 wrote:If I was the NBA I'd start worrying when ESPN gets anything else with consistent ratings other than sports.

There's a reason every single streaming service wants local blackouts... it legit won't be able to sell cable without it.

Hell Professional Wrestling is extremely boring and it still often is among the top rating getter in key demographics because there is nothing produced on television worth paying for anymore.


It is understood that tv ratings are catering but I don't think people appreciate how much they've collapsed this century.

Yellowstone was the highest rated tv show last week with 8.83 million tuning in. In Nov 2010, a show called the mentalist hit almost 14 million. In a country of 370 million people that is nothing. Simply put there is no such thing as a hit show anymore.

Sports is one of the few things that people reliably watch live. All sports, even sports declining in popularity like baseball, are extremely valuable to networks for the reasons you outlined. It is one of the few things that can guarantee eyeballs. The NBA will get the figure it wants. And if it leaves TNT/ESPN it will because it choose to leave.

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv-news/tv-ratings-sunday-nov-20-2022-1235267690/
https://tvseriesfinale.com/tv-show/tv-show-ratings-november-11-2010-18869/



i think politics and cancel culture have ruined the need to watch modern tv shows. nobody wants to feel like they are being indoctrinated when watching a new sitcom. sports is no different from that, the nba still has not recovered the lost consumers from the blm bubble nightmare. in this aspect the nfl was smart to blackball kaepernick and put that whole saga in the rear view mirror and their tv ratings recovered

Return to The General Board