drekwins wrote:xBulletproof wrote:drekwins wrote:
A lot of other guys were a part of that team... ANT, Brunson... And they only got better as the year went on. Physically, he looks fine. You are right that he deserves benefit of the doubt for his outside shooting. He has been a 40% 3pt shooter... but he may not be the volume scorer we thought he was.
It's also very different when you're on the scouting report and game planned for. It's much more difficult.
Edwards took 17 shots a game his rookie year. Haliburton career high is 15.2. Brunson took 18 per before team USA. These guys have already done it, built their bodies for that role and understood what it is. That was never Haliburton game, in college or NBA. It's the same thing as Paul George. Paul talked about it in Indiana his first couple years trying to be the man. It was more than he was ready for physically and didn't understand what it took to do that all year long. It's why his efficiency wasn't great until year 7. Fully believe it would have been year 5, but broken leg and all threw that all off.
I really wanted him to have all offseason to build up his body in preparation for that role. Not sure how well he's going to be able to do that while playing in the Olympics and lead up to it .... again.
**EDIT** - Looking post All Star in Paul George first All Star season, he shot 32% from 3. His 2nd All Star season, he shot under 40% from the field as a whole, post All Star game. Which doesn't even include an injury like Haliburton had during that same time.
You do realize that these guys have played basketball pretty much every day of their life since they're 10 years old, right? In AAU, during the summer, these guys are playing multiple games per day, several days in a row... that's their offseason. Then, they have their entire HS season during the winter. In college, early-season and conference tournaments often require playing 2, 3 or 4 days in a row. Not to mention, even when there are not games, they are still playing/practicing in various environments, leagues and amongst other players/friends.
I really dont buy the "build the body up" thing at all.
The only difference is the game-planning/physicality of the playoffs. That takes an adjustment.
Then you're ignoring the people who have played it, and I can tell you from baseball as you move up it's different based on the # of games coming at you from little league, middle/high school, college and pro. It's just more draining, physically and mentally. Especially when you're in a slump and have no break to reset. That's not even a sport that has the physicality of basketball where other players can lean on, pull/push and put pressure on you physically.
There are adjustments in that sense even from college basketball to NBA. Let alone all the lower levels you're talking about. As you move up the levels, everyone is skilled. The difference becomes more and more about strength/physicality as you move up. Playing every day at a level where you're the most skilled, tallest or strongest is fine, but when you're no longer that, it changes. It's more tiring, and draining on you. As your role expands it's different again. Why do you think players hit a rookie wall? Soph slump? They just forget how to play? It's obvious it's physical.
Paul George is just one of the few who will talk about it publicly. Most players are afraid of average fans backlash. You're paid millions, just shut up. Get over it ... ect.