Zespetjest wrote:Playing on east is unreal easy to get to playoffs, so do those stats mean anything at all?
Yeah let’s discredit Lebron James playoff stats all those years playing in the worst version of the eastern conference
Moderators: KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, infinite11285, Harry Garris, ken6199, Dirk, bisme37
Zespetjest wrote:Playing on east is unreal easy to get to playoffs, so do those stats mean anything at all?
Zespetjest wrote:Also this:
?s=12
PierceFan4ever wrote:Zespetjest wrote:Playing on east is unreal easy to get to playoffs, so do those stats mean anything at all?
Yeah let’s discredit Lebron James playoff stats all those years playing in the worst version of the eastern conference
KyRo23 wrote:TheNG wrote:Total playoff stats means nothing. It benefits players who win 4-3 almost twice over players who win 4-0.
I feel this is kind of short sighted. Over a players career, you're going to have seasons where you have both. You're going to have seasons where you lose in the first round, times you win a ring and play a lot of games, hard series, short series...
If you take a look at the top playoff scoring list, it looks pretty good to me. It's just how basketball works. A few short series of 4-0 over your career is not really going to effect your all time point total, especially if you play 15 years.
Here is the list -
LeBron
Jordan
Kareem
Kobe
Shaq
Tim Duncan
Durant
Malone
Erving
West
There is the top 10. The nitpicking of shorter series to longer series seems moot at that point
Zespetjest wrote:Playing on east is unreal easy to get to playoffs, so do those stats mean anything at all?
KyRo23 wrote:TheNG wrote:Total playoff stats means nothing. It benefits players who win 4-3 almost twice over players who win 4-0.
I feel this is kind of short sighted. Over a players career, you're going to have seasons where you have both. You're going to have seasons where you lose in the first round, times you win a ring and play a lot of games, hard series, short series...
If you take a look at the top playoff scoring list, it looks pretty good to me. It's just how basketball works. A few short series of 4-0 over your career is not really going to effect your all time point total, especially if you play 15 years.
Here is the list -
LeBron
Jordan
Kareem
Kobe
Shaq
Tim Duncan
Durant
Malone
Erving
West
There is the top 10. The nitpicking of shorter series to longer series seems moot at that point
KyRo23 wrote:Zespetjest wrote:Playing on east is unreal easy to get to playoffs, so do those stats mean anything at all?
Of course it means something. Giannis plays in the east too and has been passed by Tatum. Celtics have been one of the best teams the past handful of seasons, it is earned for him IMO
HotelVitale wrote:KyRo23 wrote:Zespetjest wrote:Playing on east is unreal easy to get to playoffs, so do those stats mean anything at all?
Of course it means something. Giannis plays in the east too and has been passed by Tatum. Celtics have been one of the best teams the past handful of seasons, it is earned for him IMO
Hmm seems like the obvious stance here is that he's been good in the PO but also been on very good teams that had no chance of missing the PO (or often losing in the 1st round even). Tatum is part of that but he also started with 50+ win teams that had been making deep runs for years, and had Brown-Horford-Smart for the early runs (plus a rotating cast of Hayward, Kyrie, etc for a while).
Both things true: Tatum was ready to be a big contributor right away and has stayed that way, and he also had a very unusual head start coming right into a team that was built to go deep in the PO.
bisme37 wrote:HotelVitale wrote:KyRo23 wrote:Of course it means something. Giannis plays in the east too and has been passed by Tatum. Celtics have been one of the best teams the past handful of seasons, it is earned for him IMO
Hmm seems like the obvious stance here is that he's been good in the PO but also been on very good teams that had no chance of missing the PO (or often losing in the 1st round even). Tatum is part of that but he also started with 50+ win teams that had been making deep runs for years, and had Brown-Horford-Smart for the early runs (plus a rotating cast of Hayward, Kyrie, etc for a while).
Both things true: Tatum was ready to be a big contributor right away and has stayed that way, and he also had a very unusual head start coming right into a team that was built to go deep in the PO.
The thing that has been forgotten over time was Tatum got drafted to a team with Kyrie and Hayward but neither of those guys actually played in the postseason in Tatum's first season. (Or did anything good for the C's in the postseason at all during their Celtics tenures.)
JT was the #1 playoff option as a rookie and the C's got to Game 7 of the ECFs before getting Lebronned in the last few minutes of the game.
During Tatum's career the worst result for the Celtics was actually the year Kyrie was healthy and he was the #1 option instead of JT.
Homer38 wrote:bisme37 wrote:HotelVitale wrote:
Hmm seems like the obvious stance here is that he's been good in the PO but also been on very good teams that had no chance of missing the PO (or often losing in the 1st round even). Tatum is part of that but he also started with 50+ win teams that had been making deep runs for years, and had Brown-Horford-Smart for the early runs (plus a rotating cast of Hayward, Kyrie, etc for a while).
Both things true: Tatum was ready to be a big contributor right away and has stayed that way, and he also had a very unusual head start coming right into a team that was built to go deep in the PO.
The thing that has been forgotten over time was Tatum got drafted to a team with Kyrie and Hayward but neither of those guys actually played in the postseason in Tatum's first season. (Or did anything good for the C's in the postseason at all during their Celtics tenures.)
JT was the #1 playoff option as a rookie and the C's got to Game 7 of the ECFs before getting Lebronned in the last few minutes of the game.
During Tatum's career the worst result for the Celtics was actually the year Kyrie was healthy and he was the #1 option instead of JT.
In 2021,the celtics were a .500 team and a first round exit in 5 games but you are right for the rest!
bisme37 wrote:HotelVitale wrote:KyRo23 wrote:Of course it means something. Giannis plays in the east too and has been passed by Tatum. Celtics have been one of the best teams the past handful of seasons, it is earned for him IMO
Hmm seems like the obvious stance here is that he's been good in the PO but also been on very good teams that had no chance of missing the PO (or often losing in the 1st round even). Tatum is part of that but he also started with 50+ win teams that had been making deep runs for years, and had Brown-Horford-Smart for the early runs (plus a rotating cast of Hayward, Kyrie, etc for a while).
Both things true: Tatum was ready to be a big contributor right away and has stayed that way, and he also had a very unusual head start coming right into a team that was built to go deep in the PO.
The thing that has been forgotten over time was Tatum got drafted to a team with Kyrie and Hayward but neither of those guys actually played in the postseason in Tatum's first season. (Or did anything good for the C's in the postseason at all during their Celtics tenures.) JT was the #1 playoff option as a rookie and the C's got to Game 7 of the ECFs before getting Lebronned in the last few minutes of the game. During Tatum's career the worst result for the Celtics was actually the year Kyrie was healthy and he was the #1 option instead of JT.
Zespetjest wrote:Playing on east is unreal easy to get to playoffs, so do those stats mean anything at all?
Zespetjest wrote:Also this:
?s=12
GiannisAnte34 wrote:I think we all know what would happen if Tatum and Giannis swapped teams. The Celtics would be a dynasty and the Bucks would struggle to be relevant
GiannisAnte34 wrote:I think we all know what would happen if Tatum and Giannis swapped teams. The Celtics would be a dynasty and the Bucks would struggle to be relevant
Joshyjess wrote:GiannisAnte34 wrote:I think we all know what would happen if Tatum and Giannis swapped teams. The Celtics would be a dynasty and the Bucks would struggle to be relevant
PierceFan4ever wrote:GiannisAnte34 wrote:I think we all know what would happen if Tatum and Giannis swapped teams. The Celtics would be a dynasty and the Bucks would struggle to be relevant
If that helps you sleep better at night. Bucks were the favorites last year and co favorites this year to win the chip at the beginning of the season but let’s use team excuses now
GiannisAnte34 wrote:Joshyjess wrote:GiannisAnte34 wrote:I think we all know what would happen if Tatum and Giannis swapped teams. The Celtics would be a dynasty and the Bucks would struggle to be relevant
PierceFan4ever wrote:GiannisAnte34 wrote:I think we all know what would happen if Tatum and Giannis swapped teams. The Celtics would be a dynasty and the Bucks would struggle to be relevant
If that helps you sleep better at night. Bucks were the favorites last year and co favorites this year to win the chip at the beginning of the season but let’s use team excuses now
I'd rather have a competent franchise than one that simply got lucky to have a better #1 option. the Bucks have fumbled so many opportunities to put a better team around Giannis. the Celtics with Brad at the helm have made so many smart decisions, which add up to a team that just has better supporting pieces
you can delude yourself into believing that it's all because Tatum is a better player though.