Toronto

Moderators: KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, infinite11285, Harry Garris, ken6199, Dirk, bisme37

tsherkin
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 79,247
And1: 20,672
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: Toronto 

Post#61 » by tsherkin » Fri May 3, 2024 10:06 pm

Black Jack wrote:Seems like they waited too long to trade OG / Siakam. Do you guys think you're well positioned now?


Lord, no, lol.
dickfox
Senior
Posts: 593
And1: 526
Joined: Apr 13, 2019
       

Re: Toronto 

Post#62 » by dickfox » Fri May 3, 2024 10:14 pm

Too much isolation drive and kicks and the shooters couldn't hit shots consistently.

They were scary in transition but got bogged down in the half court which is what playoff basketball is all about.
SeanDaRyan
Junior
Posts: 343
And1: 130
Joined: Sep 01, 2013
     

Re: Toronto 

Post#63 » by SeanDaRyan » Sat May 4, 2024 1:47 am

Nurse is a terrible coach. He played the starters 35min a game...never gave the bench any mins at all. Ran his starters into the ground so they were injured all the time and limped into the post season completely out of gas.

That being said Nurse was the right coach at the right time to win a championship. I dont see him coaching Philly much longer
Anticon
General Manager
Posts: 7,970
And1: 4,957
Joined: Dec 16, 2004

Re: Toronto 

Post#64 » by Anticon » Sat May 4, 2024 1:55 am

Lots of problems as others have outlined with fit, defence and three points shooting.

But main problem was a lack of natural scorers. Fred was the closest but was too small and easily blocked.

Siakam, OG and Barnes all had automatic parts to their offensive the game (Siakam at the elbow, OG in the corner, and Barnes around the rim) but were overall too clunky and not fluid.

Combine them all and you got a horrendous half court offense as the offensive options on every play were really limited and they couldn't initiate even what they did well. So they focused on turnovers and transition scoring which of course isn't sustainable.

I do think there was a chance at building a team around Fred, Siakam and OG. But once they drafted Barnes the roster was too limited and the failure was inevitable. In some ways moving up in the draft that year, but not high enough to get Mobley or Cade, was the end of that team.
tdotrep2
RealGM
Posts: 24,110
And1: 25,453
Joined: May 21, 2011
 

Re: Toronto 

Post#65 » by tdotrep2 » Sat May 4, 2024 1:59 am

they played scottie barnes like he was pj tucker and let fred dribble the ball with no spacing as oppose to letting scottie/siakam dribble and fred space. it was freds contract year
Jabroni Lames
Analyst
Posts: 3,369
And1: 3,971
Joined: Apr 08, 2018

Re: Toronto 

Post#66 » by Jabroni Lames » Sat May 4, 2024 2:30 am

Nick Nurse is the only coach in the NBA where his cult followers believe it’s a perfectly normal excuse to say he was given too much talent to work with.

It’s been truly entertaining to see the Nurse cult try to explain why Nurse not getting out of the first round is a resounding success.
gbball
Starter
Posts: 2,116
And1: 2,304
Joined: Oct 23, 2009

Re: Toronto 

Post#67 » by gbball » Sat May 4, 2024 3:07 am

Ray Donovan wrote:How did Toronto w/Siakam, OG &Barnes leading the way not do better in the playoffs the Last few seasons ? Had Trent Jr to shoot & a decent pt guard too + Nic Nurse is a damn good coach, smh


I think bad team chemistry, uninspired coaching and bad luck did them in last year with Nurse. Fred/Trent/Siakam were playing for contracts...Nurse didn't/wouldn't invest in his bench and he would burn out the starters by the end of the game and have them take turns isoing to choke winnable games away.

This year, I think OG was checked out and everyone else was exploring their roles while learning a new system where different things were valued. Not having Koloko who projected to be an elite rim protector really hurt. We had flashes of being a dominant team, but new coach, more emphasis on offense, questionable officiating and bad injury luck derailed our season before we made the Siakam trade and later pivoted to a tank.

Ironically, I do think Precious, Flynn, OG and Siakam all look like improved players based on their time with Darko this year...it just didn't come together fully on our team.
doogie_hauser
Pro Prospect
Posts: 921
And1: 1,322
Joined: Feb 04, 2024
         

Re: Toronto 

Post#68 » by doogie_hauser » Sat May 4, 2024 3:35 am

Nick Nurse is a championship coach for one of the smaller market teams that have always struggled to attract big name talent to their franchise (taxes and Canadian currency a factor)

I don't like the guy particularly much, but it was a phenomenal effort to coach that team to a historical first championship, esp against Steph and The Dubs.

More respect should be given to him and that championship.
TheAlchemist
General Manager
Posts: 8,581
And1: 8,247
Joined: Apr 06, 2010
   

Re: Toronto 

Post#69 » by TheAlchemist » Sat May 4, 2024 4:31 am

The problem was simple:
3 players played the same position. Scottie, OG, and Siakam. I don't know why we didn't hold onto Siakam post OG trade, but seem like he was going to leave no matter what.

We are much better now that we have balance, it doesn't show yet but next year we'll be talked about again.
rapluva
Analyst
Posts: 3,259
And1: 941
Joined: Nov 20, 2008

Re: Toronto 

Post#70 » by rapluva » Sat May 4, 2024 4:51 am

Not many Raptor fans have them pegged to make the playoffs..they say play-in..

With Barnes/RJ Barrett/ Imanuel Quickley/Poetel in the starting lineup with a decent shooter..

We need a decent point guard..along with a backup center that is decent.
Jabroni Lames
Analyst
Posts: 3,369
And1: 3,971
Joined: Apr 08, 2018

Re: Toronto 

Post#71 » by Jabroni Lames » Sat May 4, 2024 2:22 pm

There was zero overlap between Scottie & OG. That narrative is categorically false.

OG occupied the corners, Scottie operated in the post and above the break.

Siakam/Barnes/OG had a +3.4 net rating this year and a +3.6 net rating last year.

There was zero problem with that trio’s fit. Do people even check the numbers before they spew false narratives?
Jabroni Lames
Analyst
Posts: 3,369
And1: 3,971
Joined: Apr 08, 2018

Re: Toronto 

Post#72 » by Jabroni Lames » Sat May 4, 2024 5:53 pm

UcanUwill wrote:Pascal, OG and Barbes essentially play same position, their game does excell in different ways, but the fit was clunky. I think there is a reason why basketball is played the way it is, and why positions exist still. Similar case with Phoenix this year I guess, individually, these players were good.

Also, sometimes it can be as easy as, do you have best player to close out the game. These 3 weren't that.


Positive net rating for that trio +3.6 with Nurse & +3.4 with Darko. Try again.

It was Nurse’s inability to optimize anybody other than FVV & Siakam as well as his stubbornness sticking to his defensive schemes that were figured out years earlier, that caused the Raptors to under-perform.
User avatar
ItsDanger
RealGM
Posts: 25,064
And1: 22,299
Joined: Nov 01, 2008

Re: Toronto 

Post#73 » by ItsDanger » Sat May 4, 2024 6:07 pm

Too many fans won't admit half court shot creation matters a lot for team success. Until then, excuses are made ignoring the obvious reality. Even when observing current playoff teams, they won't acknowledge the obvious difference.

Recent Raptors teams have struggled scoring in the half court. Priority #1 should be addressing that.
Organization can be defined as an organized body of people with a particular purpose. Not random.
User avatar
raptor jesus
RealGM
Posts: 10,622
And1: 22,016
Joined: Feb 12, 2011
 

Re: Toronto 

Post#74 » by raptor jesus » Sat May 4, 2024 6:13 pm

Poor depth and shooting and skill, because the front office was obssessed with 6'9 guys regardless of skill level. Defensively, the team stopped buying in to Nurse's defensive strategy because of how much effort it required on a nightly basis, and the league caught up to Nurse (his zones and gimmicky defences became less effective) and he refused to adjust.
tsherkin
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 79,247
And1: 20,672
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: Toronto 

Post#75 » by tsherkin » Sat May 4, 2024 6:28 pm

ItsDanger wrote:Recent Raptors teams have struggled scoring in the half court. Priority #1 should be addressing that.


Very much so, but we have also ranked poorly from 3.

2022: 19th in volume, 20th in 3P%, 27th in pace
2023: 21st in volume, 28th in shooting, 26th in pace
2024: 22nd in volume, 27th in shooting, 11th in pace

That has not helped. And obviously post-Lowry, we didn't have any kind of quality POA dribble attack until Quickley. And we weren't running again until this season.

We have been a possession-control team (very strong on the O-boards and at avoiding turnovers) and have sucked at hitting shots from basically everywhere. This was what happened when we fielded a bunch of inefficient scorers without dynamic penetration or setup. Our offense has been a disaster; it was worse this year relative to league average than it had been since the 2012 lockout. And our rankings in previous seasons have been propped up by ORB% and TOV% as much as anything, because we've ranked 21st, 27th, 28th and 21st in team eFG% going back to 2021.

It'd be more accurate to say we just flat-out struggled to score.
User avatar
ItsDanger
RealGM
Posts: 25,064
And1: 22,299
Joined: Nov 01, 2008

Re: Toronto 

Post#76 » by ItsDanger » Sat May 4, 2024 6:37 pm

tsherkin wrote:
ItsDanger wrote:Recent Raptors teams have struggled scoring in the half court. Priority #1 should be addressing that.


Very much so, but we have also ranked poorly from 3.

2022: 19th in volume, 20th in 3P%, 27th in pace
2023: 21st in volume, 28th in shooting, 26th in pace
2024: 22nd in volume, 27th in shooting, 11th in pace

That has not helped. And obviously post-Lowry, we didn't have any kind of quality POA dribble attack until Quickley. And we weren't running again until this season.

We have been a possession-control team (very strong on the O-boards and at avoiding turnovers) and have sucked at hitting shots from basically everywhere. This was what happened when we fielded a bunch of inefficient scorers without dynamic penetration or setup. Our offense has been a disaster; it was worse this year relative to league average than it had been since the 2012 lockout. And our rankings in previous seasons have been propped up by ORB% and TOV% as much as anything, because we've ranked 21st, 27th, 28th and 21st in team eFG% going back to 2021.

It'd be more accurate to say we just flat-out struggled to score.

Disagree. Prior to last season, Raps had one of best transition offenses in the league. Its half court offense especially back end of shot clock that's the problem. Essentially, a talent deficit. Debatable if management will address this.
Organization can be defined as an organized body of people with a particular purpose. Not random.
tsherkin
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 79,247
And1: 20,672
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: Toronto 

Post#77 » by tsherkin » Sat May 4, 2024 6:44 pm

ItsDanger wrote:Disagree. Prior to last season, Raps had one of best transition offenses in the league. Its half court offense especially back end of shot clock that's the problem. Essentially, a talent deficit. Debatable if management will address this.


Our halfcourt offense was a large problem, I agree.

But again, because we were so slow, our transition opportunities were only so many. But it's one of those things evolving over the past couple of seasons. For example, we were 14th in transition efficiency this year, 16th in 2023, 24th in 2022, 19th in 2021, and it was only back in 2020 when we were any good. And we were quite good, ranking 3rd in the league.

So no, we have not had one of the best transition offenses, not for about half a decade. We've actually been average to poor in the last several seasons.
User avatar
UcanUwill
RealGM
Posts: 27,703
And1: 29,145
Joined: Aug 07, 2011
 

Re: Toronto 

Post#78 » by UcanUwill » Sat May 4, 2024 6:53 pm

Jabroni Lames wrote:
UcanUwill wrote:Pascal, OG and Barbes essentially play same position, their game does excell in different ways, but the fit was clunky. I think there is a reason why basketball is played the way it is, and why positions exist still. Similar case with Phoenix this year I guess, individually, these players were good.

Also, sometimes it can be as easy as, do you have best player to close out the game. These 3 weren't that.


Positive net rating for that trio +3.6 with Nurse & +3.4 with Darko. Try again.

It was Nurse’s inability to optimize anybody other than FVV & Siakam as well as his stubbornness sticking to his defensive schemes that were figured out years earlier, that caused the Raptors to under-perform.


Yeah, ok, it was depth problem as knowledgeable posters have pointed out, and positive rating doesnt mean fit could have been better as they in fact had 3 good forwards as you clearly show, but lacked sustainability in other areas. If one of the forwards was PG and obe was a C, maybe positive rating would have been better all across the board?

You really need to quote me twice in two days to show me there is some kind off fool obsessed with Nick Nurse? War is f'ing happening, get a life, I dont give a f** Nick Nurse ***ed your wife...

Sorry, bad mood, I have bigger issues than NBA coach being bad, if you so passionate,maybe later I will like to read your expose analysis where Nick Nurse failed, beside talent good, result bad stuff. Where is your piece published? But for now, let us both sit in a corner and rethink our lives, maybe?
User avatar
Dirk
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 13,211
And1: 36,742
Joined: Dec 12, 2005
     

Re: Toronto 

Post#79 » by Dirk » Sat May 4, 2024 7:16 pm

UcanUwill wrote:
Jabroni Lames wrote:
UcanUwill wrote:Pascal, OG and Barbes essentially play same position, their game does excell in different ways, but the fit was clunky. I think there is a reason why basketball is played the way it is, and why positions exist still. Similar case with Phoenix this year I guess, individually, these players were good.

Also, sometimes it can be as easy as, do you have best player to close out the game. These 3 weren't that.


Positive net rating for that trio +3.6 with Nurse & +3.4 with Darko. Try again.

It was Nurse’s inability to optimize anybody other than FVV & Siakam as well as his stubbornness sticking to his defensive schemes that were figured out years earlier, that caused the Raptors to under-perform.


Yeah, ok, it was depth problem as knowledgeable posters have pointed out, and positive rating doesnt mean fit could have been better as they in fact had 3 good forwards as you clearly show, but lacked sustainability in other areas. If one of the forwards was PG and obe was a C, maybe positive rating would have been better all across the board?

You really need to quote me twice in two days to show me there is some kind off fool obsessed with Nick Nurse? War is f'ing happening, get a life, I dont give a f** Nick Nurse ***ed your wife...

Sorry, bad mood, I have bigger issues than NBA coach being bad, if you so passionate,maybe later I will like to read your expose analysis where Nick Nurse failed, beside talent good, result bad stuff. Where is your piece published? But for now, let us both sit in a corner and rethink our lives, maybe?


Don't evade the language filter. If you have to write words that get filtered out... then let the words be filtered out.

It is a paradox to say Jabroni Lames is some kind of fool obsessed with Nurse, "while war is happening"... while at the same time you're swearing at Jabroni... "while war is happening".

We all get frustrated and are not in the bad mood at times... but perhaps in those moments, we also need to appreciate others may also have their own things going and it's not ideal if you are lashing out at someone that you don't know.

Jabroni only pointed to a stat. Keep your spirits up and don't lash out at fellow realgmers, especially when clearly no ill intention exists in the post back to you.

Raptors fans still view Jonas a franchise legend. Be nice to the Raps!
60/21/10
User avatar
cupcakesnake
Senior Mod- WNBA
Senior Mod- WNBA
Posts: 12,175
And1: 24,965
Joined: Jul 21, 2016
 

Re: Toronto 

Post#80 » by cupcakesnake » Sat May 4, 2024 7:45 pm

Jabroni Lames wrote:
UcanUwill wrote:Pascal, OG and Barbes essentially play same position, their game does excell in different ways, but the fit was clunky. I think there is a reason why basketball is played the way it is, and why positions exist still. Similar case with Phoenix this year I guess, individually, these players were good.

Also, sometimes it can be as easy as, do you have best player to close out the game. These 3 weren't that.


Positive net rating for that trio +3.6 with Nurse & +3.4 with Darko. Try again.

It was Nurse’s inability to optimize anybody other than FVV & Siakam as well as his stubbornness sticking to his defensive schemes that were figured out years earlier, that caused the Raptors to under-perform.


I don't find these points great:
- First off it's +3.9 (in 1173 minutes) vs. +3.3 (in 527 minutes). Just a massive sample size difference and we don't have enough +/- data to do much with the Darko year.

- The Barnes part of that trio was a very different player in his second and third years. Namely his ability to shoot the 3. In his first 2 years, Scottie could only score inside 10 feet, which made him an awful fit with Siakam. In year 3, the shooting transformed and you could play Scottie anywhere on the court. If Scottie had been able to shoot, the 2023 Raptors would have been a different team.

- I have criticisms about the defense, but despite having no rim protector they still finished top 10ish in defense rating in 2022 and 2023. It's a far cry from the defensive dominance they had before Marc Gasol, Lowry, and Ibaka left, but it's not shabby for a defense that has been "figured out". That defense had a really specific goal: force turnovers. Nurse knew this roster had to win a possession battle because their halfcourt offense was light on shot creation, and spacing. Turnovers weren't just stops for the Raptors, they were offense. That scheme (vastly different from the one he used in 2019 and 2020) led the NBA in turnover percentage. It was frustrating to watch at times, when the Raptors were giving up open dunks, but overall I think the coaching strategy there was sound and successful.
"Being in my home. I was watching pokemon for 5 hours."

Co-hosting with Harry Garris at The Underhand Freethrow Podcast

Return to The General Board