sikma42 wrote:Harry Garris wrote:Jasen777 wrote:He had a bad game. It happens.
It’s crazy that 32/8/9 is a bad game, but yeah I guess by his standards it was.
8 assists isn’t good with 8 turnovers. 32 points isn’t really impressive on the efficiency. It’s just not a good game buy any superstar standards. It’s not some Jokic thing.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
9 assists and 7 turnovers, not that it changes anything, but certainly, the slash lines aren't the only thing as if it's Westbrook, there would be more focus on the shooting percentages and turnovers. It's a relatively "bad" game.
It's a very good defensive strategy. Taking Gobert off Jokic and putting him on Gordon allows him to be a roamer as you are content leaving Aaron Gordon open outside. On the roll as long as the primary defender stays connected, you can push Murray into the mid-range and then Gobert can take away the baseline as well as contest.life_saver wrote:
it's actually fascinating at how Wolves are defending the Jokic-Murray 2 man game. KAT is just totally focused on Jokic and rarely even paying attention to Murray in those PnR plays.They just don't want ball in Jokic hands and making decisions during those Jokic-Murray plays
It's a great plan. Denver made some adjustments in game such as having a shooter on the near side leaving less help on the opposite side. Either way, this takes out a lot of situations where Jokic can catch on the middle of the floor against a moving defense and make decisions to shoot, pass, etc where e's just too deadly.
The Lakers actually attempted the same thing using Rui on Jokic and the Sixers with PJ on Jokic, both allowing Davis and Embiid to roam, but neither of those teams had the overall length and defensive talent of the Wolves.
It's going to be a fun series seeing how the chess match works.