How do you perceive Darius Garland?
Moderators: KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, infinite11285, Harry Garris, ken6199, Dirk, bisme37
Re: How do you perceive Darius Garland?
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,594
- And1: 4,520
- Joined: Aug 02, 2016
Re: How do you perceive Darius Garland?
he lacks the power and explosion to finish at the rim a lot, but he's very talented.
Re: How do you perceive Darius Garland?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,687
- And1: 5,422
- Joined: Sep 10, 2021
Re: How do you perceive Darius Garland?
No, I'm saying if we're trying to see where he ranks in the league when it comes to PG, then we should probably rate him next to other PGs lolRichard4444 wrote:JujitsuFlip wrote:That is more a list of guys who handle the ball than PGs. Garland is a legit PG, the only position he plays. A vast majority of those guys are combos, some even sliding to the 3 at times. Garland plays 1 and only 1.Richard4444 wrote:We have 15 players that are better Doncic, Curry, Shai, Brunson, Haliburton, Lillard, Morant, Irving, Trae, Jrue, Harden, Jamal, Fox, Maxey, and LaMello.
Then we still have Dejonte Murray, Derrick White, Fred Van Vleet, Conley, Cade, Coby White...
So you are saying Garland is worse than these players because he is less dynamic.
Re: How do you perceive Darius Garland?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,687
- And1: 5,422
- Joined: Sep 10, 2021
Re: How do you perceive Darius Garland?
No it was not as an injury replacement, the coaches selected him. You're probably thinking of his teammate that season, Allen. Or former small Cav PG Mo Williams.mg wrote:I think Donovan Mitchell works better as the PG in Cleveland. The Cavs best play of the season ironically occurred when Garland and Mobley were injured and they were rolling out a clear #1 guard and one defensive big. It just gets way too muddled trying to play with 2 small ball dominant guards and 2 defensive/offensively challenged bigs in the starting lineup.
Garland could work really well on other teams (Pels, Spurs come to mind). His lone all star appearance was as an injury replacement a few years ago when the game was in Cleveland. He still has a lot to prove though. He had that one good playoff game against the Knicks last year but overall he's been pretty disappointing the last 2 years in the postseason.
https://www.nba.com/cavaliers/releases/all-star-reserves-220203
Also, to your other point, it was the weakest part of the Cavs schedule when they won 18 out of 20 games. The opponents combined winning percentage was like 40% they werw punching down over that stretch.
Yes, the fit sucks but I would make zero roster moves based on that 20 game sample.
Re: How do you perceive Darius Garland?
- jazzfan1971
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 38,961
- And1: 8,140
- Joined: Jul 16, 2001
- Location: Salt Lake City
Re: How do you perceive Darius Garland?
I think this is who he is. I think the big drop people are seeing is just his usage going down. He went from about 28% to 27% to only 25% this year. By my eye that accounts for almost all the change in his stats. At least his offensive ones. Can he handle a larger role? Probably. Would he look better on a team starved for usage? Yup. Do I expect him to 'bounce back'? No. Not unless his usage goes up, which seems unlikely if Mitchell is still there or there is a change in coaching.
I see him as a near all-star level player who is who is playing at or near his ceiling. That is, I wouldn't trade for him expecting him to improve. I would expect more of the same depending on his usage.
I see him as a near all-star level player who is who is playing at or near his ceiling. That is, I wouldn't trade for him expecting him to improve. I would expect more of the same depending on his usage.
"Thibs called back and wanted more picks," said Jorge Sedano. "And Pat Riley, literally, I was told, called him a mother-bleeper and hung up the phone."
Re: How do you perceive Darius Garland?
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,684
- And1: 849
- Joined: May 19, 2023
Re: How do you perceive Darius Garland?
jazzfan1971 wrote:I think this is who he is. I think the big drop people are seeing is just his usage going down. He went from about 28% to 27% to only 25% this year. By my eye that accounts for almost all the change in his stats. At least his offensive ones. Can he handle a larger role? Probably. Would he look better on a team starved for usage? Yup. Do I expect him to 'bounce back'? No. Not unless his usage goes up, which seems unlikely if Mitchell is still there or there is a change in coaching.
I see him as a near all-star level player who is who is playing at or near his ceiling. That is, I wouldn't trade for him expecting him to improve. I would expect more of the same depending on his usage.
Yeah, your eye is very wrong, he dropped from a 101 TS+ to 97 and his BPM dropped from 2.4 to -1.0.
Re: How do you perceive Darius Garland?
-
- Senior
- Posts: 653
- And1: 176
- Joined: Feb 16, 2016
Re: How do you perceive Darius Garland?
basketballRob wrote:Orlando could potentially have $40m in cap space to offer Mitchell a max contract in 2025 if he doesn't sign an extension. Paolo, Franz, and Mitchell on Orlando.louc1970 wrote:cgf wrote:
Cleveland will be really interesting this offseason. Either Mitchell is staying and they should dangle Garland, or Mitchell is leaving and they have to hold onto Garland for dear life. If they enter next season with both PGs on their roster, that'll be a colossal mistake IMO.
I've suggested various Garland for Franz or Ingram based trades, but the Cavs can't pursue those until Spida commits.
If Orlando would swap Franz for Garland, I would make that trade regardless of Mitchell resigning.
Cleveland could then trade either Mitchell or Mobley and get back the missing pieces.
Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM Forums mobile app
That would be a good group. But Banchero's game would have to change from being the primary focus to being 1b. Is he capable of that?