NBA Finals: Boston vs. LA Lakers - Series BOS leads (1-0)

Moderators: KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, infinite11285, Harry Garris, ken6199, Dirk, bisme37

Who will win game 2?

Boston Celtics
62
63%
Los Angeles Lakers
36
37%
 
Total votes: 98

User avatar
Miami's Finest
Starter
Posts: 2,401
And1: 0
Joined: May 19, 2004

 

Post#41 » by Miami's Finest » Fri Jun 6, 2008 4:10 am

The Pierce return was great stuff. And I like that KG decided to be the man at the finish which is what everyone has been wanting from him.
User avatar
CoolD
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,878
And1: 971
Joined: Mar 26, 2007
 

 

Post#42 » by CoolD » Fri Jun 6, 2008 4:10 am

Wheelchair was a stunt.
Most gullible people fall for it though.
User avatar
Ortho Stice
Veteran
Posts: 2,889
And1: 76
Joined: Mar 11, 2003

 

Post#43 » by Ortho Stice » Fri Jun 6, 2008 4:10 am

One thing that was completely overlooked by the "experts" was the fact that defense always prevails, which was very evident at the end of the game when the Celtics got a bunch of key stops. Sam Cassell shouldn't play for the rest of the series, he was killing them for a while, and let the Lakers back into a game in which the Celtics should've put away. There's no way the Lakers can win the championship by relying solely on their offense, they need to tighten up their defense.
User avatar
Iggyemu
RealGM
Posts: 22,376
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 22, 2003
Location: Jacksonville

 

Post#44 » by Iggyemu » Fri Jun 6, 2008 4:11 am

BRINGTHEPAIN wrote:That was the most entertaining NBA Finals game1 since Bulls/Jazz 1997 whereby Jordan capped off a tight and physical game with the buzzer-beater.


Wow dude...really?

Sixers/Lakers 2001 game 1 was much much much much much better than this game.
"One Ring makes a Champion......Six Rings make a Legend" - Michael Jeffrey Jordan
JordansBulls
RealGM
Posts: 60,452
And1: 5,321
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: HCA (Homecourt Advantage)

 

Post#45 » by JordansBulls » Fri Jun 6, 2008 4:11 am

BRINGTHEPAIN wrote:That was the most entertaining NBA Finals game1 since Bulls/Jazz 1997 whereby Jordan capped off a tight and physical game with the buzzer-beater.


What about Sixers/Lakers game 1 2001?
Image
"Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships."
- Michael Jordan
Big Lob
Pro Prospect
Posts: 894
And1: 331
Joined: Apr 21, 2007

 

Post#46 » by Big Lob » Fri Jun 6, 2008 4:11 am

The Laker Kid wrote:Did Phil get outcoached?


Looked more like execution and hitting shots. Phil wasn't to blame for that.
User avatar
Miami's Finest
Starter
Posts: 2,401
And1: 0
Joined: May 19, 2004

 

Post#47 » by Miami's Finest » Fri Jun 6, 2008 4:13 am

Big Lob wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Looked more like execution and hitting shots. Phil wasn't to blame for that.


Agreed. Rivers made some mistakes, I def. wouldn't blame this on Phil. Hard to win when the MVP goes 9 for 26.
BRINGTHEPAIN
Banned User
Posts: 823
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 16, 2008

 

Post#48 » by BRINGTHEPAIN » Fri Jun 6, 2008 4:13 am

Sixers/Lakers game 1 2001 was good but the quality of performance wasn't at the same level as Bulls/Jazz. Niether was the level of drama.
User avatar
eatyourchildren
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,501
And1: 11
Joined: Mar 26, 2007

 

Post#49 » by eatyourchildren » Fri Jun 6, 2008 4:16 am

Wasn't a blowout, so I think game 2 is still up for grabs. I don't expect Kobe to shoot so poorly again, either.
ugkfan2681" wrote: wrote: i dont take **** lightly im from the land of the trill home of the rockets RESPECT OK.
Ballings7
RealGM
Posts: 23,566
And1: 1,489
Joined: Jan 04, 2006

 

Post#50 » by Ballings7 » Fri Jun 6, 2008 4:16 am

Once again, you do need at least decent depth in the playoffs, and it needs to be relatively diverse depth. The difference is just the rotations and players used are more set, and the factor of rest is lessened.

This is in reference to something I've seen said multiple times over the years, that you don't need depth in the playoffs. Of course you do, that's a key part in being a title contender.
The Playoffs don't care about your Analytics
User avatar
Iggyemu
RealGM
Posts: 22,376
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 22, 2003
Location: Jacksonville

 

Post#51 » by Iggyemu » Fri Jun 6, 2008 4:17 am

BRINGTHEPAIN wrote:Sixers/Lakers game 1 2001 was good but the quality of performance wasn't at the same level as Bulls/Jazz. Niether was the level of drama.


Nobody said that game. You said tonight's Celts game was better than any Finals game 1 since Bulls/Jazz. Thats not true. Sixers/Lakers was better than tonights game. Not better than Bulls/Jazz.
"One Ring makes a Champion......Six Rings make a Legend" - Michael Jeffrey Jordan
User avatar
TMU
Forum Mod - Rockets
Forum Mod - Rockets
Posts: 30,188
And1: 10,411
Joined: Jan 02, 2005
Location: O.R.
       

 

Post#52 » by TMU » Fri Jun 6, 2008 4:18 am

Iggyemu wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Nobody said that game. You said tonight's Celts game was better than any Finals game 1 since Bulls/Jazz. Thats not true. Sixers/Lakers was better than tonights game. Not better than Bulls/Jazz.


Yep, great Celtics victory tonight; but this game doesn't stand a chance against game 1 of Sixers - Lakers finals.
BRINGTHEPAIN
Banned User
Posts: 823
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 16, 2008

 

Post#53 » by BRINGTHEPAIN » Fri Jun 6, 2008 4:19 am

Once again we hear Mark Jackson comparing Kobe to Jordan, and once again it hurts his credibility....HEAVILY.

For those who haven't heard, Jordan describes Mark Jackson is a "hot dog".
User avatar
Miami's Finest
Starter
Posts: 2,401
And1: 0
Joined: May 19, 2004

 

Post#54 » by Miami's Finest » Fri Jun 6, 2008 4:19 am

eatyourchildren wrote:Wasn't a blowout, so I think game 2 is still up for grabs. I don't expect Kobe to shoot so poorly again, either.


I agree, Kobe should have a high % and Odom will be better. Boston is going to have to be even better than they were today. hopefully that means no Cassell
Ballings7
RealGM
Posts: 23,566
And1: 1,489
Joined: Jan 04, 2006

 

Post#55 » by Ballings7 » Fri Jun 6, 2008 4:19 am

Pistons/Spurs G5 2005 is an all-time classic IMO, and has been shown multiple times on NBA TV and ESPN Classic...

And as mentioned same for Sixers/Lakers G1 '01... awesome game
User avatar
CoolD
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,878
And1: 971
Joined: Mar 26, 2007
 

 

Post#56 » by CoolD » Fri Jun 6, 2008 4:20 am

Boston is just more physical. They have P.J Brown, Posey, Perkins, that are physical players. Lakers have probably more talented, but finesse players. They should try to speed up the tempo more at times.

Boston is a team, if Lakers win the next game. Lakers will probably win it in 6. If Boston wins the next one. This probably going 7.
dsorc
Pro Prospect
Posts: 914
And1: 91
Joined: Apr 22, 2007
 

 

Post#57 » by dsorc » Fri Jun 6, 2008 4:20 am

idrinkrootbeer wrote:One thing that was completely overlooked by the "experts" was the fact that defense always prevails, which was very evident at the end of the game when the Celtics got a bunch of key stops. Sam Cassell shouldn't play for the rest of the series, he was killing them for a while, and let the Lakers back into a game in which the Celtics should've put away. There's no way the Lakers can win the championship by relying solely on their offense, they need to tighten up their defense.

I disagree on Cassell. He just needs to be kept on a short leash. When his shot is on it's very helpful since we have so little scoring on the second unit and he can take some pressure off the big three. When his shot is off he needs to yanked quickly though as he's a blackhole. I trust him with PG duties more than House though they should share minutes depending on who's got the hot hand.
TheSheriff
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,513
And1: 3,255
Joined: Aug 04, 2007

 

Post#58 » by TheSheriff » Fri Jun 6, 2008 4:21 am

The Celtics did what they planned to do to Kobe, turn him into a volume jump shooter. They have done that to him three times this year and that has contained him and beaten the Lakers three times. This is why Tom Thibodeau should be an NBA head coach.
Big Lob
Pro Prospect
Posts: 894
And1: 331
Joined: Apr 21, 2007

 

Post#59 » by Big Lob » Fri Jun 6, 2008 4:21 am

I kind of feel like this series is going to be won in six by either team.
Ballings7
RealGM
Posts: 23,566
And1: 1,489
Joined: Jan 04, 2006

 

Post#60 » by Ballings7 » Fri Jun 6, 2008 4:21 am

CoolD wrote:Boston is just more physical. They have P.J Brown, Posey, Perkins, that are physical players. Lakers have probably more talented, but finesse players. They should try to speed up the tempo more at times.


Indeed.
The Playoffs don't care about your Analytics

Return to The General Board