SuigintouEV wrote:Scenario 1
Clippers: You can have whoever you like
Lebron: I pick Mike Brown and Danny Ferry
CLippers: BUt they're under contract with the cavs
Lebron: I know *****, i picked the cavs.
+1
Moderators: Harry Garris, ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, infinite11285
SuigintouEV wrote:Scenario 1
Clippers: You can have whoever you like
Lebron: I pick Mike Brown and Danny Ferry
CLippers: BUt they're under contract with the cavs
Lebron: I know *****, i picked the cavs.
LApwnd wrote:man and I thougth Clev are desperate to keep Lebron, Clipps are just plain out pathetic
InBoobieWeTrust wrote:SuigintouEV wrote:Scenario 1
Clippers: You can have whoever you like
Lebron: I pick Mike Brown and Danny Ferry
CLippers: BUt they're under contract with the cavs
Lebron: I know *****, i picked the cavs.
+1
jman23 wrote:I busted out laughing when i saw this......so true.@ndrew wrote:Clippers ARE desparate. Some coaches are under contract and will not be willing to go just because they were "picked". Will you like to hear: Shut up, coach. I chose you that's why we are going to run this play." That's just too much pressure. You are not building organizations like that. Lebron is not instant championship. Ask Cavaliers and they will tell. You do not let players dictate the way you move THAT much. Primadonnas...
Mofoo wrote:I would like to see that happen. Would be really interesting to see Clippers being the primary team of LA at least for a while. This being said, if Lebron is to leave Cleveland I think it will take more than a mediocre team letting him pick his coach.
Somehow Wade&Lebron@NY sounds more of a story.
Clip34life wrote:jman23 wrote:I busted out laughing when i saw this......so true.@ndrew wrote:Clippers ARE desparate. Some coaches are under contract and will not be willing to go just because they were "picked". Will you like to hear: Shut up, coach. I chose you that's why we are going to run this play." That's just too much pressure. You are not building organizations like that. Lebron is not instant championship. Ask Cavaliers and they will tell. You do not let players dictate the way you move THAT much. Primadonnas...
Yeah that's so true. That's why Kobe wants Mike K, so he can tell him to shut up and do what he wants. So true you guys, so true.
lj4mvp wrote:Puertorique wrote:I think it was last year that one of the Dolan's mentioned that they would offer Lebron his own Channel after he was to sign in NY as a incentive. The network would be national also.
Neither that or what the Knicks did would be considered tampering because they are "rumors" and no one approached Lebron or his agent or went on national TV with the idea. When the talk is going on inside the organization it does not qualify as tampering.
when the talk is leaked outside the organization it's tampering. LeBron isn't a free agent now, is eligible for an extension, and isn't even a free agent this summer unless he opts out of his current contract. Anything a team other than Cleveland does that can be perceived as influencing either of those decisions (opting out, signing an extension) is tampering.
And an owner providing LeBron a second revenue stream outside of his NBA contract (i.e. his own tv channel) violates the CBA
Tirion wrote:supaflash wrote:They should let him change the name and the logo and jerseys too
Hmm... power struggle going on between the Buss fam and Phil Jackson... Jackson praising Bron... Bron retiring MJ's jersey, taking over Kobe's best player status...
LeBron comes to the Clips, convinces Phil Jackson to become coach/GM, or maybe brings back Jerry West too... Clips end up with #1 Pick... instant dynasty
Phil Jackson is a very outspoken left-wing liberal. Donald Sterling is a closest thing to a rich, radical right-wing republican you can get. Basically he represents everything that Jackson despises. Also Sterling fired and humiliated Jerry West's close friend and former teammate Elgin Baylor, who in turn filed a lawsuit against Clippers for racial discrimination. So there.
LApwnd wrote:forget picking a gm/coach, Lebron should be the 1st to do all 3 at once...He'll surely be the GOAT of everything
DrunkOnMystery wrote:LApwnd wrote:forget picking a gm/coach, Lebron should be the 1st to do all 3 at once...He'll surely be the GOAT of everything
That's actually against league rules. You can't be a player/coach anymore.
pro2020 wrote:Lebron gets what he want's in Cleveland, why would he go anywhere else?
DrunkOnMystery wrote:lj4mvp wrote:Puertorique wrote:I think it was last year that one of the Dolan's mentioned that they would offer Lebron his own Channel after he was to sign in NY as a incentive. The network would be national also.
Neither that or what the Knicks did would be considered tampering because they are "rumors" and no one approached Lebron or his agent or went on national TV with the idea. When the talk is going on inside the organization it does not qualify as tampering.
when the talk is leaked outside the organization it's tampering. LeBron isn't a free agent now, is eligible for an extension, and isn't even a free agent this summer unless he opts out of his current contract. Anything a team other than Cleveland does that can be perceived as influencing either of those decisions (opting out, signing an extension) is tampering.
And an owner providing LeBron a second revenue stream outside of his NBA contract (i.e. his own tv channel) violates the CBA
By that logic, a team saying "We're clearing cap space to make a run at Lebron when he's a free agent" is tampering. And it isn't.
LApwnd wrote:DrunkOnMystery wrote:LApwnd wrote:forget picking a gm/coach, Lebron should be the 1st to do all 3 at once...He'll surely be the GOAT of everything
That's actually against league rules. You can't be a player/coach anymore.
Its the King we talking bout here, I'm sure Sterling will make this one exception
lj4mvp wrote:[quote="DrunkOnMystery]
By that logic, a team saying "We're clearing cap space to make a run at Lebron when he's a free agent" is tampering. And it isn't.
[/quote]
That absolutely is tampering too - which is why teams don't say that. And teams have been warned by the league for that very thing.[/quote]
Free Rider wrote:lj4mvp wrote:DrunkOnMystery wrote:
By that logic, a team saying "We're clearing cap space to make a run at Lebron when he's a free agent" is tampering. And it isn't.
That absolutely is tampering too - which is why teams don't say that. And teams have been warned by the league for that very thing.
Yeah but its also the reason why the tampering rules are an absolute joke. It's so easy to circumvent the tampering rules without officially breaking them that even an incompetent organization like the Clippers can get away with it without fear of any repercussions.
From the memo:
“If a member of your organization is asked by the media about a potential free agent prior to the July 1 following the last season covered by the player’s contract, or about any other person under contract with another NBA team, the only proper response is to decline comment.”
“Penalties for tampering include suspension of the offending person, prohibition of the offending team from hiring the person being tampered with, forfeiture of draft picks, and individual and/or team fines of up to $5 million.”