2023-24 NBA Season Discussion

Moderators: penbeast0, trex_8063, PaulieWal, Doctor MJ, Clyde Frazier

User avatar
Jaivl
Head Coach
Posts: 6,902
And1: 6,511
Joined: Jan 28, 2014
Location: A Coruña, Spain
Contact:
   

Re: 2023-24 NBA Season Discussion 

Post#3141 » by Jaivl » Wed May 15, 2024 9:21 pm

lessthanjake wrote:I’m expecting the Timberwolves to take Game 6. Not that I’d be *super* surprised if Denver won Game 6, but it’s almost impossible to win 4 in a row (with 3 of them on the road) against a team that’s as good as the Timberwolves and that is competitive enough with you to have won the first two games on your home court.

They don't have to win "4 in a row", though. That's a priori. They only have to win once.
This place is a cesspool of mindless ineptitude, mental decrepitude, and intellectual lassitude. I refuse to be sucked any deeper into this whirlpool of groupthink sewage. My opinions have been expressed. I'm going to go take a shower.
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 32,351
And1: 20,415
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: 2023-24 NBA Season Discussion 

Post#3142 » by Colbinii » Wed May 15, 2024 9:23 pm

Jaivl wrote:
lessthanjake wrote:I’m expecting the Timberwolves to take Game 6. Not that I’d be *super* surprised if Denver won Game 6, but it’s almost impossible to win 4 in a row (with 3 of them on the road) against a team that’s as good as the Timberwolves and that is competitive enough with you to have won the first two games on your home court.

They don't have to win "4 in a row", though. That's a priori. They only have to win once.


Get your Probability 101 out of here.

We need narratives so Skip Bayless can sleep at night.
tsherkin wrote:Locked due to absence of adult conversation.

penbeast0 wrote:Guys, if you don't have anything to say, don't post.


Circa 2018
E-Balla wrote:LeBron is Jeff George.


Circa 2022
G35 wrote:Lebron is not that far off from WB in trade value.
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 32,351
And1: 20,415
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: 2023-24 NBA Season Discussion 

Post#3143 » by Colbinii » Wed May 15, 2024 9:24 pm

Bro really thinks if you flip a coin 3 times and get all heads that the 4th flip isn't 50/50.
tsherkin wrote:Locked due to absence of adult conversation.

penbeast0 wrote:Guys, if you don't have anything to say, don't post.


Circa 2018
E-Balla wrote:LeBron is Jeff George.


Circa 2022
G35 wrote:Lebron is not that far off from WB in trade value.
sp6r=underrated
RealGM
Posts: 17,660
And1: 9,179
Joined: Jan 20, 2007
 

Re: 2023-24 NBA Season Discussion 

Post#3144 » by sp6r=underrated » Wed May 15, 2024 9:29 pm

Special_Puppy wrote:
sp6r=underrated wrote:
Colbinii wrote:
Sleeping on the 2013 Knicks :roll:

This is probably the best Knicks team since 1994.


I'm going by playoff wins. This team surpassed the 2013 Knicks last night. This team might be the best club since the 94 knicks but they're close to teams like the 97/13 editions rather than 93/94 (legit title contenders)


If the Knicks were healthy, could you see them beating Boston in a 7 game series?


Huge upsets do happen but a knicks victory would be a huge upset.

So yeah I think the Knicks have a puncher's chance but they're huge underdogs. Given how 3 point shot driven the NBA is, their hope is the Celtics go bizzarely cold while the knicks get super hot.

Not likely but that is my hope.
lessthanjake
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,708
And1: 1,453
Joined: Apr 13, 2013

Re: 2023-24 NBA Season Discussion 

Post#3145 » by lessthanjake » Wed May 15, 2024 9:32 pm

Jaivl wrote:
lessthanjake wrote:I’m expecting the Timberwolves to take Game 6. Not that I’d be *super* surprised if Denver won Game 6, but it’s almost impossible to win 4 in a row (with 3 of them on the road) against a team that’s as good as the Timberwolves and that is competitive enough with you to have won the first two games on your home court.

They don't have to win "4 in a row", though. That's a priori. They only have to win once.


Yes, of course I understand that—it’s very basic probability. Which is why you see the contrast between me saying I wouldn’t be “super surprised” if they won Game 6 but then also saying it’s “almost impossible” to win 4 in a row. If I thought winning game 6 was “almost impossible” at this point, then it would be something that I *would* be “super surprised” by! The reason I wouldn’t be super surprised is precisely because it’s just one game at this point, since the other three have already happened! My language was admittedly confusing, because I shifted concepts from one clause to the next within the same sentence. So your response is a reasonable one, but hopefully this clarifies things. In any event, I do think it’s one game that is actually meaningfully more difficult than the typical game. It’s a bigger lift than any of the prior three. This is for various reasons, including the opposing team being more desperate (especially as compared to the games when they were ahead in the series), the opposing team potentially having more adjustments to make after being the one to lose multiple previous games in a row, the opposing team being at home, the team that’s made the comeback from 0-2 likely having exhausted themselves more physically when getting out of that hole, etc. These sorts of things contribute to why teams virtually never have won 4 in a row after losing the first 2 at home. Teams have won three in a row after dropping the first two at home, but getting that fourth in a row has never happened except for two teams playing against .500 opponents. But yes, even though there’d really be no prior precedent for a team actually winning 4 straight after losing 2 at home to a genuinely good team, because the Nuggets have already gotten the first three it couldn’t be *that* surprising if they did it. Which is why I said it wouldn’t be super surprising. I just wouldn’t expect it, because I think that last game is a massive lift.
OhayoKD wrote:Lebron contributes more to all the phases of play than Messi does. And he is of course a defensive anchor unlike messi.
lessthanjake
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,708
And1: 1,453
Joined: Apr 13, 2013

Re: 2023-24 NBA Season Discussion 

Post#3146 » by lessthanjake » Wed May 15, 2024 9:40 pm

Colbinii wrote:Bro really thinks if you flip a coin 3 times and get all heads that the 4th flip isn't 50/50.


That’s a not even remotely fair reading of what I said, buddy. See my above post for more of an explanation.

I’d add though that basketball games really aren’t like coin flips. Having won three in a row *does* actually probably make the next game more difficult, for reasons I mentioned in my above post. Basketball games absolutely are not independent events that have no effect on the probability of winning in the next game. Of course, it would be dumb to suggest that the chance of winning the 4th game is equal to the chance of winning 4 in a row, since the first 3 wins have already happened. But it is also silly to suggest that the chance of winning the 4th game in a row must be the same as the chance of winning the 1st, 2nd, or 3rd game, like it would be with a coin flip. That’s just a gross oversimplification, particularly when we are talking about something that is massively affected by mental factors that change based on what has happened previously.
OhayoKD wrote:Lebron contributes more to all the phases of play than Messi does. And he is of course a defensive anchor unlike messi.
parsnips33
Head Coach
Posts: 6,267
And1: 2,701
Joined: Sep 01, 2014
 

Re: 2023-24 NBA Season Discussion 

Post#3147 » by parsnips33 » Wed May 15, 2024 10:00 pm

Would love a competitive coin-flipping forum where we can call a guy a fraud for not flipping 5 heads in a row and argue about how the league has gotten soft since we switched to zinc alloys
rk2023
Starter
Posts: 2,150
And1: 2,158
Joined: Jul 01, 2022
   

Re: 2023-24 NBA Season Discussion 

Post#3148 » by rk2023 » Wed May 15, 2024 10:14 pm

parsnips33 wrote:Would love a competitive coin-flipping forum where we can call a guy a fraud for not flipping 5 heads in a row and argue about how the league has gotten soft since we switched to zinc alloys


MJ dominated an era of copper alloys instead, therefore there’s no way you could think LeBron or Jokic are close on offense.
Mogspan wrote:I think they see the super rare combo of high IQ with freakish athleticism and overrate the former a bit, kind of like a hot girl who is rather articulate being thought of as “super smart.” I don’t know kind of a weird analogy, but you catch my drift.
rk2023
Starter
Posts: 2,150
And1: 2,158
Joined: Jul 01, 2022
   

Re: 2023-24 NBA Season Discussion 

Post#3149 » by rk2023 » Wed May 15, 2024 10:24 pm

How well Jokic has been torchinf the league with strength, touch, and moving very well for his size makes me very intrigued and hopeful that Zach Edey can carve a role (at minimum) in the pros with some very similar macro-skill sets here. He’d be a great fit in Memphis with the 9th pick imo
Mogspan wrote:I think they see the super rare combo of high IQ with freakish athleticism and overrate the former a bit, kind of like a hot girl who is rather articulate being thought of as “super smart.” I don’t know kind of a weird analogy, but you catch my drift.
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 51,019
And1: 19,698
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: 2023-24 NBA Season Discussion 

Post#3150 » by Doctor MJ » Wed May 15, 2024 10:27 pm

rk2023 wrote:How well Jokic has been torchinf the league with strength, touch, and moving very well for his size makes me very intrigued and hopeful that Zach Edey can carve a role (at minimum) in the pros with some very similar macro-skill sets here. He’d be a great fit in Memphis with the 9th pick imo


The Edey question is a fascinating one. I don't think we've ever had such a dominant college big be greeted with such apathy by NBA scouts before. Obviously times have changed and he's a worse prospect than he would have been in an earlier era...but how much worse should he be? Is he being underrated?
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
sp6r=underrated
RealGM
Posts: 17,660
And1: 9,179
Joined: Jan 20, 2007
 

Re: 2023-24 NBA Season Discussion 

Post#3151 » by sp6r=underrated » Wed May 15, 2024 11:14 pm

Doctor MJ wrote:
rk2023 wrote:How well Jokic has been torchinf the league with strength, touch, and moving very well for his size makes me very intrigued and hopeful that Zach Edey can carve a role (at minimum) in the pros with some very similar macro-skill sets here. He’d be a great fit in Memphis with the 9th pick imo


The Edey question is a fascinating one. I don't think we've ever had such a dominant college big be greeted with such apathy by NBA scouts before. Obviously times have changed and he's a worse prospect than he would have been in an earlier era...but how much worse should he be? Is he being underrated?


Yup, I have no idea how he'll do in the pros or if he'll even make it at all. The one thing that is interesting to me is how quickly the center position recovered from the transition to 3ball that occured in the late 00s. It goes to show how much this sport will always come down to height.

As an aside, the re-emergence of the point-center position with gods like Jokic and mere mortals like Sabonosis has made me think of Adelman as a kind of apostle for a dying religion which in this case is the passing-big man hub offense.
Special_Puppy
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,553
And1: 1,104
Joined: Sep 23, 2023

Re: 2023-24 NBA Season Discussion 

Post#3152 » by Special_Puppy » Wed May 15, 2024 11:19 pm

rk2023 wrote:How well Jokic has been torchinf the league with strength, touch, and moving very well for his size makes me very intrigued and hopeful that Zach Edey can carve a role (at minimum) in the pros with some very similar macro-skill sets here. He’d be a great fit in Memphis with the 9th pick imo


Read on Twitter
Special_Puppy
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,553
And1: 1,104
Joined: Sep 23, 2023

Re: 2023-24 NBA Season Discussion 

Post#3153 » by Special_Puppy » Wed May 15, 2024 11:28 pm

Doctor MJ wrote:
rk2023 wrote:How well Jokic has been torchinf the league with strength, touch, and moving very well for his size makes me very intrigued and hopeful that Zach Edey can carve a role (at minimum) in the pros with some very similar macro-skill sets here. He’d be a great fit in Memphis with the 9th pick imo


The Edey question is a fascinating one. I don't think we've ever had such a dominant college big be greeted with such apathy by NBA scouts before. Obviously times have changed and he's a worse prospect than he would have been in an earlier era...but how much worse should he be? Is he being underrated?


Out of curiosity where is the top 10 in Career College BPM (minimum of 50 games so that excludes a lot of one and done):
1. Edey (Outcome TBD)
2. Delon Wright (20th overall pick. Respectable career)
3. Donovan Clingan (TBD)
4. Walker Kessler (Drafted 22nd Awesome rookie year, but had a disappointing sophomore year)
5. Keegan Murray (Drafted 4th overall. TBD)
6. Frank Kaminsky (Drafted 9th overall. Bust)
7. Draymond Green (Drafted 31st overall. HOF)
8. Xavier Tillman (Drafted 35th overall. Bench Guy)
9. Jae Crowder (Drafted 34th overall. Respectable Career)
10. Mark Williams (Drafted 15th overall. Keeps getting injured)
sp6r=underrated
RealGM
Posts: 17,660
And1: 9,179
Joined: Jan 20, 2007
 

Re: 2023-24 NBA Season Discussion 

Post#3154 » by sp6r=underrated » Thu May 16, 2024 1:24 am

It is hard for me to believe that Al Horford 16 years ago as a rooke lost in a G7 to an ATG Celtics team. It is also equally hard for me to remember the Al Horford of Atlanta who never shot 3s with the one who is now a knockdown 3 point shooter.

He was a # 3 pick so it isn't like he entered the NBA with no expectations. But the way he's reinvented himself over the years to fit the current is impressive and on some level inspirational.
lessthanjake
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,708
And1: 1,453
Joined: Apr 13, 2013

Re: 2023-24 NBA Season Discussion 

Post#3155 » by lessthanjake » Thu May 16, 2024 1:31 am

OhayoKD wrote:There is no approach to RAPM to get Jokic to #1 beyond comparing the average of a much smaller sample to the average of a much larger one. If it wasn't to your chagrin you would be comparing over similar time frames, or checking frequency.

Comparing even samples is not desperate, it is an essential step and one you are constantly disregarding because you are either desperate for a certain conclusion or are just incompetent with numbers.

Liking Nikola Jokic is not an excuse to pretend averages over half the minutes of another player support him as being better over a similar-time frame(peak, prime, ect), and it's sad this has to be explained to you in the first place.


This is just silly. It’s a bizarrely elaborate way to say that you think looking at career RAPM is improper. After all, it’s career RAPM that Jokic is #1 in, so that’s what you’re saying is improper. Of course, I’m quite certain you’d think otherwise if LeBron were ahead of Jokic. But anyways, what do you want instead? To compare RAPM specifically in their peak years? That may be nice if we could do it, but there’s essentially no RAPM measures (with no box prior) that have multi-year data for both Jokic’s and LeBron’s peak years (and there’s serious potential different-scaling issues if we did). The one RAPM measure that I’m aware of that has multi-year data for Jokic’s peak years is NBAShotCharts, and it’s worth noting that Jokic’s luck-adjusted NBAShotCharts RAPM for 2020-2021 through 2022-2023 was the highest recorded by any player in any three-year span in their data set, including being higher than any three-year period from LeBron (the first three year data is 2013-2016, though, so it doesn’t have data from some of LeBron’s best years). And, since we don’t really know that things were scaled the same in different timeframes, I’ll note that Jokic absolutely cooked the next highest people in that timeframe, with *by far* the largest gap to #2 anyone had in any timeframe. So, if you don’t like career RAPM, the RAPM data we have from Jokic’s peak years specifically is also extremely good and is consistent with him being the #1 RAPM player overall. And that’s not even getting into the fact that most impact measures we talk about are basically just RAPM with some sort of prior, so peak Jokic doing incredibly well in those (as I showed in the post I previously linked to) is obviously indicative of peak Jokic having incredible RAPM.


Speaking of which



And yet you felt the need to

A. Compare uneven samples(5 years of Lebron: 4 for Jokic)
B. Not choose the best sample for Lebron (swap 2013 for 2008 and...he peaks higher than Jokic)
C. gigantically shrink the sample in a way that throws out Lebron's best data

And the two are still basically tied.

The fact Lebron has multiple 5-year stretches comparable(and one better) to the 4-year one you picked for Jokic(15-17 would also be up there) is a big hint that these are not comparable players. And of course, if you were really worried about "end of season games", you could have always went with what was a similar off-sample with a similar rotation concentrated in a single year(making it a much larger sample per-season):


You are wanting to cherry-pick LeBron’s best time periods in different stats and compare a nonexistent-in-reality combination of those against what Jokic has actually done in one particular time period.


Please stop flinging rhetorical terms you do not understand. Cherrypicking is when you take a smaller part of a whole to draw a conclusion about the whole.

By the measure you chose, Lebron still peaks higher than Jokic. Swapping years to get Lebron peaking lower is an example of cherrypicking. Only choosing 4 years of Jokic as opposed to 5 for Lebron is also cherrypicking. Removing the vast majority of the sample here is...cherrypicking..

The chosen approach and frame of comparison both cherrypick in a manner which negatively affects Lebron's numbers and... Lebron still peaks higher over more years.

At least with RAPM where outliers are artificially scaled down, if you made the comparison uneven enough to get an output that prefers Jokic. With WOWY, not even an uneven approach helps you, which is why you went with a prior instead of just comparing the best samples.


This is just complete projection. I am not the one “swapping years.” The analysis I provided you gave data for peak Jokic and peak LeBron across a ton of different measures. For both players, I used the same timeframe across all the different measures I looked at (i.e. the last 4 years for Jokic, and 2009-2013 for LeBron). That is the *opposite* of “swapping years.” I was completely consistent in what years I included and what years I didn’t. Meanwhile, you respond by saying that, for one of the measures, I should’ve measured using different years for LeBron, because those years would’ve been better for him in that measure. It is transparently you who is advocating for “swapping years.” And it’s quite ironic that your response to me saying that that’s cherry picking years was to say “[s]wapping years . . . is an example of cherrypicking.” :lol:

Again, pick a specific timeframe for LeBron that you want to compare peak Jokic to, so that we can compare the overall picture of all available data that these players had over those specific timeframes. Otherwise, you’re just picking and choosing what years to look at for different measures, creating an overall data picture for LeBron that never actually simultaneously existed, in order to say that this Frankenstein non-existent version of LeBron has better data than peak-Jokic. When I actually picked specific timeframes for both and compared them and used the consensus peak timeframe for LeBron (2009-2013) and Jokic (2021 onwards), Jokic looked good in the comparison, and your only response is to advocate for selective swapping of years in some measures if that’d help LeBron.


WThe correct and fair approach is to fix the time period for LeBron (which I did, using his pretty undisputed peak years) and compare data from just that time period to peak Jokic.


The correct and fair approach would have been to take the best 4 years of Jokic and compare it to the best 4 years for Lebron. You added an extra step(make it 5 not 4), still could not find the conclusion you wanted, and cooked the numbers accordingly.

Agenda-motivated stat-work at its finest.


This is absurd. You make this response while ignoring the fact that my post explicitly pointed out that I took a 5-year span for LeBron because, on balance across all data, that’s actually generally *better* for LeBron than taking any 4-year span would be (since 2009 and 2013 are great seasons and can’t both be in a 4-year span). Not only did I explicitly point that out in the post you responded to here (a part that you conveniently didn’t quote or respond to), but I’d already pointed out that exact same thing in the underlying post I made with the data we are talking about. So I have made this point multiple times now, and you just ignore it. And then it’s you that accuses me of “agenda-motivated stat-work.” Wild stuff. If you want me to compare Jokic’s last four years to LeBron’s peak four years, I’m happy to do so. Just tell me what four years you want to look at across all data. 2009 to 2012, or 2010 to 2013? Either way, on balance, the data picture is not going to look better overall for LeBron than the 2009-2013 time period did, so it’s really not going to be generally helpful to you.

And I have no idea what you’re talking about with “cook[ing] the numbers accordingly.” I didn’t cook any numbers. You just don’t like what the numbers say.

Put differently, your approach is to basically create a Frankenstein version of all of LeBron’s best data points that didn’t simultaneously occur, and then compare them to what Jokic has actually done in one specific timeframe.


I will repeat, Lebron peaks higher in the metric and (uneven) time-frame of your choosing, just like he scores a higher average over 13 years than Jokic does over 3. None of these are favorable approaches to Lebron, but Lebron still wins because he's better at basketball and more valuable to winning. As is also reflected in RAPM and, wait for it, on/off.


This seems to just be complete denial. I gave you a metric—WOWY SRS impact with end-of-season garbage games not included—and peak Jokic had a larger WOWY SRS impact than consensus-peak 2009-2013 LeBron. You then baselessly say that LeBron is higher in this metric in the timeframe I looked at. No, he’s not. WOWY is a very noisy stat, so there may be other non-peak timeframes where LeBron’s WOWY is higher, but LeBron’s output in other measures of impact in those timeframes would be far lower, so the overall data picture would still be worse. To the extent you want to actually argue a point about WOWY without undermining arguments regarding other data, your best bet is to point out that peak Jokic’s WOWY SRS impact was only slightly higher than peak LeBron’s WOWY SRS impact, but peak LeBron’s “on” SRS is a bit higher so it’s not really clear that peak Jokic’s WOWY SRS impact is actually superior. That’d be a fair point. What you’re saying here is not.

This is a consistent theme with you. When I’ve pointed out that someone like Steph has vastly superior impact data to LeBron in the years of Steph’s prime (i.e. 2013-2014 onwards), you have repeatedly responded that those aren’t LeBron’s best years and we should be comparing Steph’s data to LeBron’s data in his peak 2009-2013 years.


And this Jake, is an actual strawman. I have never specified 2009-2013 or even a specific time-frame.


Lol. Well, in discussions about Steph, you’ve stated to me that LeBron’s prime “barely” extended past 2012-2013. The obvious implication is that LeBron’s best years were from 2012-2013 and earlier. Meanwhile, you have also argued that years before 2008-2009 were not LeBron’s prime. So yeah, I’d say that the clear implication from what you’ve said is that LeBron’s best years were 2009-2013. Which would also be perfectly reasonable, since that’s the consensus peak period for LeBron. If I’m wrong about what you were saying LeBron’s peak timeframe was, then please enlighten me, so that I can do analysis across various measures for that specific timeframe.

What I have suggested was factoring in everything and comparing their best data to each other while taking into account the entirety of their careers, as opposed to just Miami, when deciding how to mentally curve/frame things. You don't quite like this because the whole of their careers suggests something very different than what one might derive if they only cared about Miami(and if we're being honest, specifically 2011).


This is you once again just wanting to create a Frankenstein data picture of LeBron that never actually simultaneously existed. The measures we look at in basketball are noisy. If you just take the “best data” for a guy with a long career, using different timeframes for different measures, and compare it to the data for a current player’s peak, you’re just creating a picture that never really existed and comparing it against someone who does exist. It’s not a fair comparison whatsoever, and is basically just leveraging as much positive noise as possible. No. Comparing all data in a specific timeframe for one player and all data in a specific timeframe for another player is the only reasonable way to compare peaks. You don’t want to do that because you don’t like the results (which I’ve shown in a lengthy post in another thread that I linked to).

Lebron cooks Curry with the same years he cooks Jokic with and cooks both (again) if one bakes in playoff translation once he returns to Cleveland, and his natural position of small forward, since the cold regular-season data from 15-17 marks him as comparable to both. What is actually happening here is you want to curve down Lebron's best signals with the justification that Miami is his real peak without considering what "peak" implies. It is natural to curve Miami up and Cleveland down. It is natural to adjust the curving based on which is more unusual for the player(hint: it's Miami). It is natural to drop the curving and take the data at face value. What is not natural is throwing out the best signals because they are "no peak" years so you can present the player as worse statistically than he actually is.


Okay, so do you want to define LeBron’s peak as 2015-2017? Do you want me to compare 2015-2017 LeBron to peak Jokic across various metrics? Because I promise you that won’t look more favorable for LeBron overall than the analysis using 2009-2013 did.

In "massively reduced off sample" WOWY, Jokic's best 4 years lose to Lebron's best 5 years. That is the statistical lede but you wanted to bury it and we both know why.


Again, this is just you completely in denial. In the WOWY SRS impact data I provided from both of their peak years, peak Jokic had larger WOWY SRS impact than peak LeBron. And yet here you are just baselessly saying “Jokic’s best 4 years lose to LeBron’s best 5 years.” I gave you the data. And it actually took a while to calculate. The least you could do is not lie about it. And the irony of you then accusing me of “bury[ing]” the “statistical lede” is certainly amusing.

Come up with a LeBron time period that you want to compare peak Jokic to and stick with it across all types of data.


The key here is Lebron wins any frame(including the one you chose) not a particular one, something we can emphasize with:
Lebron 09-21
656-263 with lebron 0.714% win rate
37-73 without lebron 0.336% win rate
net rating with lebron +6.49 (59 win pace level)
net rating without lebron -5.50 (25 win pace level)
+8.6 ortg difference
-3.68 drtg difference
+12 total swing


jokic 2022-24
136-68 (66.7% win rate) with jokic
8-15 (34.8% win rate) without jokic
+4.1 net rating with jokic (53 win pace)
-4.6 net rating without jokic (28 win pace)
+6.5 ortg change
-2.2 drtg change
+8.7 overall change


Lebron over 13>Jokic over 2. Lebron over 5 with your approach > Jokic over 4. This is why presenting them as statistical peers is comedy.


Okay, so you’re not willing to provide any peak timeframe to compare all data across and are once again just going with lying about what the data I compiled and provided said. Lol.

None of which includes the ball-handling component I listed. Additionally, as various people have brought up and you have handwaved, RAPTOR's creator straight up said they think paint-protection and big defense is overrated, 2019 kawhi was the best defender in the nba, and they weighed their inputs accordingly.


This is a largely irrelevant rabbit hole, but since I’ve seen you make this claim many times but never actually seen any evidence of it, can you show me the basis for your claim here that “RAPTOR's creator straight up said they think paint-protection and big defense is overrated, 2019 kawhi was the best defender in the nba, and they weighed their inputs accordingly”?

Lastly, if you take out the box inputs...Lebron is the figure who stands as a gigantic outlier over the field.


You’re talking about RAPTOR here, and RAPTOR’s explanation specifically says that the non-box component is far less predictive of large-sample RAPM than the box-component. Specifically, they say “‘Box’ RAPTOR is quite a bit more predictive of out-of-sample performance than ‘On-Off’ RAPTOR.” You are just talking about using one component of a metric, and the less-predictive component at that! Talk about cherry-picking! Of course, this isn’t even an accurate claim anyways, since LeBron’s average in just the non-box component of RAPTOR is not as high as Steph’s. For instance, from 2014-2020, LeBron’s RS+Playoff average is +8.27, while Steph’s from 2014-2022 is 9.53. But yeah, I’ll give you that LeBron does a little better than Jokic in one specific, far less predictive *component* of a metric that Jokic dominates LeBron in overall. Hurray!

He is not even a match with box-inputs unless you cherrypick when the comparison starts for the bulk of available metrics and pretty much none of said metrics consider Lebron's gigantic advantage as a ball-handler and ball-progressor or what he offers as a defensive floor-general.


Lol, again, the accusation that I “cherrypick[ed] when the comparison starts for the bulk of available metrics” is just completely breathtaking, when I looked at available data for LeBron in one specific timeframe (2009-2013), while you are the one out here talking about cherry-picking LeBron’s best years for different measures.

Heej has already covered how silly "ball-handling is not a problem" is, so I'll let him cook.


Heej didn’t even really disagree with me much overall. In fact, Heej said “I agree with you that Jokic is one of the best ballhandlers ever for his size and that it is a plus.” So yeah, I don’t think that was a discussion where anyone really agreed with you. And I’ll note that Jokic just showed his fantastic ball-handling again in Game 5 against the Timberwolves, repeatedly driving to the hoop, working in the post without turning the ball over, bringing the ball up a fair bit, etc. It’s a big positive in his game!
OhayoKD wrote:Lebron contributes more to all the phases of play than Messi does. And he is of course a defensive anchor unlike messi.
Special_Puppy
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,553
And1: 1,104
Joined: Sep 23, 2023

Re: 2023-24 NBA Season Discussion 

Post#3156 » by Special_Puppy » Thu May 16, 2024 2:05 am

sp6r=underrated wrote:It is hard for me to believe that Al Horford 16 years ago as a rooke lost in a G7 to an ATG Celtics team. It is also equally hard for me to remember the Al Horford of Atlanta who never shot 3s with the one who is now a knockdown 3 point shooter.

He was a # 3 pick so it isn't like he entered the NBA with no expectations. But the way he's reinvented himself over the years to fit the current is impressive and on some level inspirational.


Brook Lopez is another fun example of this. Mid on defense. Couldn't shoot a three to save his life. Now he's one of the best defenders in the NBA and is a good 3 point shooter
rk2023
Starter
Posts: 2,150
And1: 2,158
Joined: Jul 01, 2022
   

Re: 2023-24 NBA Season Discussion 

Post#3157 » by rk2023 » Thu May 16, 2024 3:06 am

Special_Puppy wrote:
rk2023 wrote:How well Jokic has been torchinf the league with strength, touch, and moving very well for his size makes me very intrigued and hopeful that Zach Edey can carve a role (at minimum) in the pros with some very similar macro-skill sets here. He’d be a great fit in Memphis with the 9th pick imo


Read on Twitter


Whether a parody account or not, I think most can agree that Zach Edey passes a nuanced eye test
Mogspan wrote:I think they see the super rare combo of high IQ with freakish athleticism and overrate the former a bit, kind of like a hot girl who is rather articulate being thought of as “super smart.” I don’t know kind of a weird analogy, but you catch my drift.
Ambrose
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,041
And1: 4,550
Joined: Jul 05, 2014

Re: 2023-24 NBA Season Discussion 

Post#3158 » by Ambrose » Thu May 16, 2024 3:21 am

This is the Luka performance we needed
User avatar
GSP
RealGM
Posts: 19,085
And1: 15,590
Joined: Dec 12, 2011
     

Re: 2023-24 NBA Season Discussion 

Post#3159 » by GSP » Thu May 16, 2024 4:01 am

Sgas gotten no help this series its actually insane how garbage the rest of the team have played after game 1

He had to turn into Mj in the 4th in game 4 and not miss a midrange shot all game to steal that one. This couldve easily been a backdoor sweep in 5 games for Dallas
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 51,019
And1: 19,698
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: 2023-24 NBA Season Discussion 

Post#3160 » by Doctor MJ » Thu May 16, 2024 4:18 am

GSP wrote:Sgas gotten no help this series its actually insane how garbage the rest of the team have played after game 1

He had to turn into Mj in the 4th in game 4 and not miss a midrange shot all game to steal that one. This couldve easily been a backdoor sweep in 5 games for Dallas


Thunder feeling not-ready yet. Maybe the supporting cast will kick up to a new level in time, but maybe this ends up one to grow on.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!

Return to Player Comparisons