wigglestrue wrote:I understand that he's an able passer, but when you're a subpar shooter and indecisive at the PG position, you're a liability.
Uh, no.
A. Subpar shooting and indecisiveness are individual liabilities in his game.
B. Rondo is not himself a liability.
Whether or not the mob (= you people) differentiates between A and B is almost completely a matter of the mob bending to the buildup or lack thereof of establishment media hype, not much of which gets fixated on players who tend to do things on the court besides score. Once you get the green signal from ESPN that it's okay to respect Rondo and give him his due, whenever the sports pseudo-intelligentsia turns that light green, there'll be all sorts of backtracking, you'll be practically gliding backward to the thrust of this thread, moonwalking into reality as if there was nothing amiss. ****, you sort of knew it all along. Sheep. Posers. And with someone actually writing Rondo was the 5th best player, I bid this thread goodbye!
LMAO. Pretend the Celtics never traded for Garnett and never traded for Ray Allen.
No one....youself included, would even think about putting Rondo in the top 15. Hell, had the Celtics been knocked out by the Hawks, it would be the same story.
Lets put it this way: if Rondo was a top 10 PG, why was it so hard for them to get past the ATL and Cleveland?