ImageImage

What was the biggest flaw in Travis Schlenk's Rebuild Blueprint?

Moderators: dms269, Jamaaliver, HMFFL

What caused Schlenk's rebuild to peter out?

Poll ended at Tue Nov 14, 2023 5:28 pm

Passing on Luka
1
25%
Whiffing on the 2019 Draft
0
No votes
Overpaying mediocre, young players
1
25%
Over paying/extending Veterans
0
No votes
Hiring Bad Coaches
1
25%
Tony Ressler being Impatient
1
25%
 
Total votes: 4

User avatar
Jamaaliver
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 38,060
And1: 14,678
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
Contact:
     

What was the biggest flaw in Travis Schlenk's Rebuild Blueprint? 

Post#1 » by Jamaaliver » Tue Sep 26, 2023 5:28 pm

How it started...

From 2021, written by the late, great Jonathan Tjarks.

It's unbelievable that it had all fallen apart a year and a half later...

Will the Hawks Become the New Model for NBA Rebuilds

Atlanta just missed the Finals, but it hasn’t missed on a draft pick in years. Without Luka or luck, GM Travis Schlenk just pulled off one of the most impressive makeovers in recent memory.

Image

Travis Schlenk was on the hot seat this season. It was playoffs or bust after the Hawks general manager spent $134 million on Danilo Gallinari and Bogdan Bogdanovic in free agency. Things hit rock bottom in March, when Atlanta dropped to 14-20 and fired head coach Lloyd Pierce. But Schlenk now looks like a visionary after his team’s surprising run to the Eastern Conference finals. The Hawks have one of the best young cores in the NBA and should contend for a long time. All the pieces of his plan have fallen into place.
Spoiler:
Schlenk was an assistant general manager for the Warriors before he took over Atlanta’s front office in 2017 and began his own version of the Process. He blew up a middling playoff team and rebuilt through the draft. His reputation has been shaped by his decision to pass on Luka Doncic in the 2018 draft. Instead of selecting Luka at no. 3, he traded back for Trae Young at no. 5 and picked up an additional first-round pick in 2019, which became Cam Reddish. Trae has blossomed into a star in these playoffs, which is now changing the perception of the trade, but the deeper lesson is that you don’t necessarily need to have the best player in a trade to win it.

The Luka trade was part of a bigger plan. Schlenk never tried to find the best player available in the draft. He wanted prospects who would complement each other and be better than the sum of their parts. The best way to do that was by acquiring extra picks to move around the board and get the exact players that he wanted.
He passed on a generational prospect in Luka in hopes of building a generational team.

His scouting background is obvious when you look at his first-round picks with the Hawks. He was never lucky in the lottery. Atlanta has moved up only once despite having one of the worst records in the league for three seasons. But it hasn’t mattered. His only miss (Omari Spellman) in four drafts was taken at no. 30:

Read on Twitter


But just finding talent isn’t enough. All that talent has to mesh and become a team. That’s what was so impressive about Atlanta’s playoff run. The young Hawks make sense together in a way that few teams built through the draft do.

Everything starts with Trae, who averaged 28.8 points on 41.8 percent shooting and 9.5 assists and 4.0 turnovers per game in his first postseason. He’s a prototypical pick-and-roll guard who can create his own shot from anywhere off the dribble and pick apart defenses on the move. That ability makes him an offense unto himself. All he needs is a roll man and some shooters and he will always be able to generate efficient shots for himself and his teammates. And he still has so much room to improve. He shot only 31.3 percent from 3 on 9.0 attempts per game in the playoffs. Trae doesn’t need to be Steph Curry to be successful. He can take some of the deeper 3s out of his game.

The most encouraging development this season is that Young learned to trust his teammates and not try to do everything himself. Like many young point guards who start their careers on bad teams, Trae got used to dominating the ball and having the whole offense flow through him. But the coaching switch from Pierce to Nate McMillan seems to have changed his approach. His stats went down, but the team went up, and he’s looked more comfortable playing off the ball.

The other big knock on Trae has been his defense, which always will be an issue given his size (6-foot-1 and 180 pounds). That’s where Schlenk’s plan comes into play. He prioritized size and length on the perimeter to protect his star guard, much like the Warriors did with Steph Curry. All three of the Hawks’ young wings—Kevin Huerter (6-foot-7 and 190 pounds), De’Andre Hunter (6-foot-8 and 225 pounds), and Reddish (6-foot-8 and 218 pounds)—are huge for their position. The defensive flexibility that provides allowed the Hawks to move Trae around on defense in the playoffs and hide him on players like P.J. Tucker, Reggie Bullock, and Furkan Korkmaz.

There are also offensive benefits to surrounding Trae with size. Defenses want to put longer players on him to bother his shot, forcing opposing point guards to move off the ball. But there’s nowhere to hide a smaller defender against Atlanta. That was the key to the team’s Game 7 win in its second-round series against Philadelphia, when Huerter exploded for 27 points on 10-of-18 shooting with Seth Curry primarily guarding him. The 76ers had to leave Curry (6-foot-2) on Huerter to put Ben Simmons on Young. So even though Trae struggled from the field (5-for-23), his fingerprints were all over the game.

That kind of complementary effect is what separated Atlanta from Philadelphia. There is no similar synergy between Simmons and Joel Embiid. They get in each other’s way instead of making each other better. It doesn’t matter that Simmons and Embiid were the best available talents when they were drafted. Picking talent over fit can leave a team short of its ceiling. That’s why the 76ers keep losing in the second round despite changing GMs, coaches, and supporting casts.

This year’s playoff run is just the start for the young Hawks. They did most of their damage in the playoffs without Hunter, who was knocked out with a meniscus injury before Game 1 against Philadelphia, and Reddish, who returned from an Achilles injury that had sidelined him since February in Game 2 against Milwaukee. Both have higher upside than Huerter, who established himself as a legit two-way wing this postseason.

The growth of Hunter and Reddish in their second seasons is another lesson in the power of fit. Neither was a slam dunk pick. Hunter was an older player (22 years old on draft night) with average advanced stats at Virginia, while Reddish struggled for much of his one season at Duke. Schlenk counted on Trae making up for their offensive limitations while they covered for him on defense.

Hunter started to turn the corner before getting injured, averaging 15.0 points on 48.4 percent shooting, 4.8 rebounds, 1.9 assists, and 0.8 steals per game during the regular season. He’s one of the most well-rounded wings in the league, with the ability to create his own shot, space the floor, rebound, and defend three positions at a high level. His defense on Julius Randle was a huge part of the Hawks’ first-round win against the Knicks.

Reddish, who is two years younger than Hunter, is further away. But there’s no denying his talent. Few players his size have his combination of skill, strength, and speed. He was great in the conference finals, averaging 12.8 points on 52.8 percent shooting, 3.5 rebounds, 1.8 assists, 1.5 steals, and 0.5 blocks in only 23.8 minutes per game off the bench. The game just comes so easy for him:



The road forward for Atlanta is clear. Its issue against Milwaukee, even after Giannis Antetokounmpo went down, was that it couldn’t stop Khris Middleton and Jrue Holiday. The backcourt of Trae and Bogdanovic has too many defensive issues. The best version of the future Hawks has Reddish on Holiday and Hunter on Middleton.

That leaves John Collins as the odd man out. He has improved a lot in his four seasons in the NBA, but he doesn’t fit as well with the rest of the young core. Collins is stuck between positions, without the perimeter game of a 4 or the interior defensive presence of a 5. It’s no coincidence that the Hawks’ growth this season has coincided with a huge decline in his stats. He will be a restricted free agent this offseason, and has reportedly already turned down a near–max offer from the Hawks. He’s still only 23 and could develop into a player who fits more comfortably within their system. But they can’t pay everyone. He’s the one they can most afford to lose over the long term.

And Atlanta already has its center of the future in Onyeka Okongwu. The biggest hole in Schlenk’s plan to become the Eastern Conference Warriors was the lack of a player like Draymond Green. That’s just not who Collins, an inconsistent passer and defender, is. Okongwu, who didn’t play much behind Clint Capela this season as a rookie, showed flashes against Milwaukee. He’s a small-ball big man with the speed to guard on the perimeter and enough size (6-foot-8 and 235 pounds) to protect the rim. He will never be a primary option, but he does have good touch around the basket and a feel for how to play off Trae in the pick-and-roll. There were times in the conference finals when the 20-year-oldlooked like the Hawks’ best option on Giannis:



The most impressive part of Atlanta’s playoff run is that this version of the team is still in training wheels. Bogdanovic, Gallinari, and Capela are solid veterans who helped stabilize the core and get them off the ground. But they shouldn’t be part of any long-term plans. The lineup of Young, Reddish, Huerter, Hunter, and Okongwu, all of whom are 23 and under, fits perfectly on both ends of the floor. Coming away from a rebuild with five talented young players who can all start together is a near miracle.
What Schlenk pulled off should be the model for the rest of the NBA. He built through the draft without getting a top-two pick, and added the right complementary pieces even though the franchise does not have a history of luring free agents. It’s the same thing he did in Golden State, where he helped GM Bob Myers put together one of the best cores in NBA history. Schlenk didn’t reinvent the wheel. He scouted well, found players who fit together, and stuck to his convictions when many had been written off. Maybe no one will write a book about him, or turn him into a cult hero. But he won’t be fired, either.
The Ringer
User avatar
Jamaaliver
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 38,060
And1: 14,678
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
Contact:
     

Re: What was the biggest flaw in Travis Schlenk's Rebuild Blueprint? 

Post#2 » by Jamaaliver » Tue Sep 26, 2023 6:37 pm

How it's going...

Read on Twitter


Just a few years ago, the Atlanta Hawks were the envy of the NBA. They had a budding superstar in Trae Young, a deep young core consisting of multiple high lottery picks, and money to spend.

Fast forward to today, and the Hawks are wrapping up the second offseason in a row where they had to salary dumb a starter (Kevin Huerter last summer, and John Collins just a few months ago) only to make the money make sense.

Instead of committing to their young core, the Hawks decided to spend their money on multiple veterans, such as Danilo Gallinari, Bogdan Bogdanović, and trading for Clint Capela. While Gallinari is long gone, the decision to mix veterans and young players to the extent that they did created suboptimal environment for player development.
Forbes
User avatar
Jamaaliver
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 38,060
And1: 14,678
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
Contact:
     

Re: What was the biggest flaw in Travis Schlenk's Rebuild Blueprint? 

Post#3 » by Jamaaliver » Tue Sep 26, 2023 7:01 pm

Revisiting Travis Schlenk’s tenure as Atlanta Hawks GM



The Atlanta Hawks hired former Golden State Warriors assistant general manager Travis Schlenk to be the new president of basketball operations and general manager on May 25, 2017. Coming from the Warriors organization, Schlenk saw firsthand how a dynasty and winning team was built. The plan was for Atlanta to build organically through the draft much like Golden State did. Schlenk also wanted to emulate the style of basketball the Warriors played by drafting to fit similar roles.
Spoiler:
[T]he first order of business for Schlenk’s rebuild was to trade veteran center Dwight Howard. On June 20, 2017, Howard was shipped off to the Charlotte Hornets along with a 2017 second-round pick (that became Frank Jackson) for Marco Belinelli, Miles Plumlee, and a 2017 second-round pick (that later became Tyler Dorsey).

With the 19th pick in the 2017 draft, Schlenk selected sophomore forward John Collins out of Wake Forest. While the Hawks did enter a rebuild, head coach Mike Budenholzer had no interest in a rebuilding team and, the two sides parted ways in April of 2018.

To further lead the rebuild, Schlenk looked towards Philadelphia 76ers assistant coach Lloyd Pierce to be the next head coach in Atlanta. And thus on May 11, 2018, Pierce was hired as the 29th head coach in Hawks history.

The 2018 offseason would prove to be the biggest offseason of the rebuild and it all started with the NBA draft. In what would become one of the most deepest and talented draft classes in recent memory, the Hawks possessed the third overall pick. Something controversial was about to happen…

With Luka Doncic still on the board, the Hawks felt it was a no-brainer to draft him, but something big was still forthcoming. Atlanta traded the draft rights of Luka Doncic to the Dallas Mavericks for the draft rights to Oklahoma freshman PG Trae Young. Schlenk felt that Young was a better fit for what Atlanta was trying to build more than Doncic. Later in that draft, the Hawks selected Maryland sharpshooter Kevin Huerter with the 19th pick. Atlanta had another first-round pick, but Omari Spellman from Villanova never panned out.

Young was supposed to be the next Stephen Curry (though he turned out to be more like his favorite player growing up Steve Nash). Huerter was supposed to be a sharpshooting wing like Klay Thompson. And Omari Spellman was supposed to be an enforcer similar to Draymond Green. It’s safe to say this didn’t work out in the Hawks’ favor. After just one season, Omari Spellman was moved to Golden State for Damian Jones and a second-round pick. Huerter was a good shooter who found a place in the rotation, but struggles with consistency held him back from living up to the Thompson mold the Hawks projected him to be. Young turned out to be a superstar amid the bust label early on, but even the Curry comparison for him turned out to be a stretch.

Many people were high on the potential the new young Hawks roster had. Going into the 2019-20 season, the Hawks had 6 players on rookie contracts. At that point the future was bright and the sky was the limit in Atlanta. After drafting Cam Reddish and trading for De’Andre Hunter at the 2019 draft, the Hawks looked as if they added a future wing duo that had high upside. Despite the potential both players showed, only one of them could start and that was Hunter. As for Reddish, he would grow unhappy with his role in Atlanta and request a trade.

After drafting Onyeka Okongwu with the sixth overall pick in the 2020 NBA draft, Schlenk decided that the rebuild should be over and the Hawks should look to make a playoff push. He wanted to see his vision come to life and after adding Bogdan Bogdanovic from the Sacramento Kings along with veterans Rajon Rondo and Danilo Gallinari.

Atlanta was finally ready to make a playoff push. Schlenk traded Rondo for Lou Williams at the trade deadline and Atlanta would eventually make a surprise run to the Eastern Conference Finals in 2021. The thing was, the Hawks still had a young team and people were excited to see the progress Atlanta would make to get back to that level.

After controversy within the front office, Schlenk was demoted from his position as President of Basketball Operation and GM to an advisory role. Eventually, this led to Schlenk leaving the organization altogether and moving on to the Washington Wizards. It was there that he was hired to be the senior vice president of player personnel in Washington. As for the Hawks, former NBA player Landry Fields was hired by the Hawks as the new GM. Originally, he was going to work alongside Schlenk in the front office, but that didn’t last very long.

Fields was tasked with trying to build the Hawks back to where they were in 2021 and the first big move was acquiring Dejounte Murray. In a lateral move, Atlanta traded Huerter to stay under the luxury tax threshold. However, Fields is simply adding on to what Schlenk had built for six years in Atlanta. Overall, it’s hard to call the rebuild a success as some of the moves didn’t work out as intended, but you can’t call it a failure either. To see what you built get turned into an Eastern Conference Finals appearance is a great feeling.

On the contrary, there is still a lot to be desired with the rebuild as it didn’t quite lead to consistent results. The Hawks still have a ton of young players to look forward to for years to come. Jalen Johnson, AJ Griffin, and Onyeka Okongwu add new revisions for what the team could look like in the coming years. As for Schlenk, he joins another franchise amid a rebuild. With his track record, the Wizards should be set up to be contenders once again in the future.

Meanwhile, Atlanta is simply working with what they have and is trying to build a contending roster from it.
Hawks Fansided
User avatar
Jamaaliver
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 38,060
And1: 14,678
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
Contact:
     

Re: What was the biggest flaw in Travis Schlenk's Rebuild Blueprint? 

Post#4 » by Jamaaliver » Tue Sep 26, 2023 7:11 pm

Perception of his drafting then vs now...

Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter


Image
User avatar
Jamaaliver
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 38,060
And1: 14,678
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
Contact:
     

Re: What was the biggest flaw in Travis Schlenk's Rebuild Blueprint? 

Post#5 » by Jamaaliver » Tue Sep 26, 2023 7:15 pm

For me, this was one of the bigger flaws in his tenure. He had 10 draft picks across the 2018 and 2019 draft.

Only one player from that haul became an above average starter in the NBA.

To his credit, he did turn some of those extra 2019 draft picks into Clint Capela, IIRC.

Read on Twitter
User avatar
Jamaaliver
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 38,060
And1: 14,678
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
Contact:
     

Re: What was the biggest flaw in Travis Schlenk's Rebuild Blueprint? 

Post#6 » by Jamaaliver » Tue Sep 26, 2023 7:22 pm

I do believe coaching had a lot to do with the talent stagnating. And after that amazing playoff run in 2021, Travis had little choice but to hire Nate as a FT HC. It all fell apart after that,

Read on Twitter
User avatar
Geaux_Hawks
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,211
And1: 1,005
Joined: Feb 18, 2011
     

Re: What was the biggest flaw in Travis Schlenk's Rebuild Blueprint? 

Post#7 » by Geaux_Hawks » Wed Sep 27, 2023 6:54 pm

This is a combo. I went with extending young, mediocre players as the main piece, but hiring Nate would've been #2 in my books.

In terms of young, mediocre players, Collins and Hunter probably should've been moved instead of extending them. Collins was just never what most thought he should've been. It's not that he was a horrible player, it was that he was probably better suited coming off the bench for less money. Hunter, while not too problematic either, wasn't the highest ceiling player at #4 when we drafted, yet had expectations that he would develop the upside of what a typical #4 draft has.

Can't blame poor draft picks, when the NBA draft is mostly built on what's available to you at the moment. It's not like MLB where you have farm systems to develop HS talents and promising college players, or NFL where you have guys usually go through 4 years of college before even entering the draft. The NBA is all about developing high upside guys with star potential. Just so happen, we got 1 high upside guy, and a high floor guy with our top 10 picks because the best prospect went top 2, and the other top prospects went at #3 or played PG. The high upside guy ultimately bust(Nate?!), while the high floor guy didn't have a ton of room in his ceiling.

On to Nate. Nate in the end was just an old fashioned coach who was unwilling to modernize his ways and philosophy. Openly admitted he couldn't relate to a group of young guys. It wasn't the killer for Schlenk, but if LP wasn't your guy, then Nate should've simply been an interim coach, and a deep dive back into the HC market should've happened that still could've included Nate for what he did on that run.
User avatar
Jamaaliver
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 38,060
And1: 14,678
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
Contact:
     

Re: What was the biggest flaw in Travis Schlenk's Rebuild Blueprint? 

Post#8 » by Jamaaliver » Fri Jan 5, 2024 8:14 pm

GS Warriors have been the single most successful franchise over the last decade, but they have essentially blown every draft pick since Travis Schlenk left.

It will be interesting what his NBA legacy looks like after all is said and done...

Overheard on Oakland Twitter:

Read on Twitter
Yungsta404
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,406
And1: 470
Joined: Jan 23, 2012
Location: ATL

Re: What was the biggest flaw in Travis Schlenk's Rebuild Blueprint? 

Post#9 » by Yungsta404 » Fri Jan 5, 2024 9:40 pm

Jamaaliver wrote:For me, this was one of the bigger flaws in his tenure. He had 10 draft picks across the 2018 and 2019 draft.

Only one player from that haul became an above average starter in the NBA.

To his credit, he did turn some of those extra 2019 draft picks into Clint Capela, IIRC.

Read on Twitter


Passing on Luka had a huge snowball effect on how Schlenk drafted. Not only Luka was the better player but Luka was a more flexible player to build around with because he had size and can play multiple positions.

After he drafted Trae, he tried to grab every wing possible in the draft to get someone that could play next to Trae and cover his weakness instead of going for BPA.
User avatar
Jamaaliver
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 38,060
And1: 14,678
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
Contact:
     

Re: What was the biggest flaw in Travis Schlenk's Rebuild Blueprint? 

Post#10 » by Jamaaliver » Thu Jan 18, 2024 3:25 pm

If Hawks had simply engaged in a consolidation trade earlier in the process for an All Star at the 3, 4 or 5 spot...

Read on Twitter
User avatar
Jamaaliver
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 38,060
And1: 14,678
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
Contact:
     

Re: What was the biggest flaw in Travis Schlenk's Rebuild Blueprint? 

Post#11 » by Jamaaliver » Thu Jan 18, 2024 7:33 pm

For as much guff as I give TS for the 2019 draft class, the reception by most pundits (and most of us)was largely positive at the time.



Image
CP War Hawks
Analyst
Posts: 3,132
And1: 1,441
Joined: Nov 28, 2017
     

Re: What was the biggest flaw in Travis Schlenk's Rebuild Blueprint? 

Post#12 » by CP War Hawks » Thu Jan 18, 2024 9:58 pm

The 2019 class was just a bad bunch. Top 5 picks rarely get traded much less twice. That alone should've let Schlenk know not to engage too much in it.

He liked his high floor, low ceiling players and that affected the teams potential we've been feeling the past year. Collins lost all his value by age 25. Same with Huerter already on the block and losing his starting job.

One too many offensive first, no defensive skilled players up and down the roster. Fields is going to clean up the roster, just have to be patient.
User avatar
D21
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,509
And1: 665
Joined: Sep 09, 2005

Re: What was the biggest flaw in Travis Schlenk's Rebuild Blueprint? 

Post#13 » by D21 » Fri Jan 19, 2024 3:23 am

Yungsta404 wrote:Passing on Luka had a huge snowball effect on how Schlenk drafted...

I'm not sure it was Schenk's decision, at least not him only deciding that.

CP War Hawks wrote:Fields is going to clean up the roster, just have to be patient.

I don't know if I will be patient enough for that, I already don't trust him since the day he made the trade for Murray (and took the job of Schlenk at the same time).
I didn't like this trade, or it could have been better if they continued to adjust the roster, and start to spend money, it was the moment to do it, but the only thing they did was a financial trade sending Huerter to SAC.
I have zero reason at this moment to trust Fields
tbhawksfan1
Analyst
Posts: 3,462
And1: 2,062
Joined: May 23, 2015

Re: What was the biggest flaw in Travis Schlenk's Rebuild Blueprint? 

Post#14 » by tbhawksfan1 » Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:48 pm

The thought of Fields competing with most other NBA GM's is a joke. Resseler must be doing acid to set up the FO like this. His inexperienced kid with a bunch of other inexperienced kids...what could go wrong :crazy: :banghead:
tbhawksfan1
Analyst
Posts: 3,462
And1: 2,062
Joined: May 23, 2015

Re: What was the biggest flaw in Travis Schlenk's Rebuild Blueprint? 

Post#15 » by tbhawksfan1 » Fri Jan 19, 2024 7:52 pm

Ainge picks up the phone and hears "Danny..Nick calling from the Hawks" say no more
jayu70
RealGM
Posts: 18,154
And1: 12,004
Joined: Mar 11, 2014
   

Re: What was the biggest flaw in Travis Schlenk's Rebuild Blueprint? 

Post#16 » by jayu70 » Fri Jan 19, 2024 8:07 pm

tbhawksfan1 wrote:Ainge picks up the phone and hears "Danny..Nick calling from the Hawks" say no more

:lol:
User avatar
Jamaaliver
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 38,060
And1: 14,678
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
Contact:
     

Re: What was the biggest flaw in Travis Schlenk's Rebuild Blueprint? 

Post#17 » by Jamaaliver » Sun Feb 18, 2024 2:00 am

Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter
King Ken
General Manager
Posts: 9,581
And1: 5,387
Joined: Jul 01, 2014
   

Re: What was the biggest flaw in Travis Schlenk's Rebuild Blueprint? 

Post#18 » by King Ken » Sun Feb 18, 2024 4:50 pm

It ended too early. OKC proved you need to do a full 5 year rebuild. Atlanta did a two year rebuild and bailed. It wasn't Travis fault. His star and owner wanted it and lacked patience

Return to Atlanta Hawks