ImageImageImage

Moss or KG

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman, canman1971, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Froob

User avatar
etopn23
Head Coach
Posts: 7,072
And1: 160
Joined: Feb 05, 2006

 

Post#21 » by etopn23 » Fri Jan 11, 2008 4:16 am

shrink wrote:Garnett is superior offensively than the other two, and certainly superior defensively.

Even better, he sets an attitude that makes the other Celtics better and more confident.
Explain.


I think it's clearly Moss. The Patriots are undefeated. People point to the line, point to Brady - but the fact of the matter is before Moss came into town no one would of DREAMED of a team having a season like this.*


*In today's NFL.
User avatar
horaceworthy
Head Coach
Posts: 6,650
And1: 250
Joined: Jan 17, 2006
Location: Ruining Fuddrucker's for everyone

 

Post#22 » by horaceworthy » Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:03 am

This topic makes me a sad panda.
"A while back,'' Cardinal said, "I took a picture of the standings and texted it to Love, just to bust his chops,'' Cardinal said. "He sent me a picture back of a snowdrift.''
User avatar
Bleeding Green
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,178
And1: 13,875
Joined: Feb 28, 2005
Location: Atlantic Champs OMG OMG OMG!

 

Post#23 » by Bleeding Green » Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:12 am

Rondo_Fan wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



This is a good point.

However, where are the Pats if they don't pick up Moss? Obviously, a lot worse than they are now, but they still might be the best team in football. You might be talking 12-4, something like that, but still heading into the playoffs with a first round bye.

I doubt they'd be 12-4. That team is ridiculous. At least 14 wins, maybe still 16.
Manocad wrote:I have an engineering degree, an exceptionally high IQ, and can point to the exact location/area of any country on an unlabeled globe.

Return to Boston Celtics