Moderators: bisme37, snowman, canman1971, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Froob, Parliament10, shackles10
Tyakack wrote:I thought the Wolves would win this series but I didn't think they would dominate like this. Maybe the Nuggets dynasty talk was a bit premature.
JaMarco wrote:Tyakack wrote:I thought the Wolves would win this series but I didn't think they would dominate like this. Maybe the Nuggets dynasty talk was a bit premature.
TBF it was impossible to see the leap teams like MIN and OKC took this year to challenge DEN in the west.
Tyakack wrote:JaMarco wrote:Tyakack wrote:I thought the Wolves would win this series but I didn't think they would dominate like this. Maybe the Nuggets dynasty talk was a bit premature.
TBF it was impossible to see the leap teams like MIN and OKC took this year to challenge DEN in the west.
It's always impossible to predict how the league will look a year or more down the line. Things can change so quickly in the NBA and that has been proven time and time again. That is why when people talk about huge title windows and dynasties and make all kinds of wild predictions years ahead of time it's silly at best and honestly kind of stupid.
Mr_Mojo_Risin wrote:Tyakack wrote:JaMarco wrote:TBF it was impossible to see the leap teams like MIN and OKC took this year to challenge DEN in the west.
It's always impossible to predict how the league will look a year or more down the line. Things can change so quickly in the NBA and that has been proven time and time again. That is why when people talk about huge title windows and dynasties and make all kinds of wild predictions years ahead of time it's silly at best and honestly kind of stupid.
We're the exception though, I honestly can't see us losing for at least 10-15 years, Banner 32 here we come!
Tyakack wrote:JaMarco wrote:Tyakack wrote:I thought the Wolves would win this series but I didn't think they would dominate like this. Maybe the Nuggets dynasty talk was a bit premature.
TBF it was impossible to see the leap teams like MIN and OKC took this year to challenge DEN in the west.
It's always impossible to predict how the league will look a year or more down the line. Things can change so quickly in the NBA and that has been proven time and time again. That is why when people talk about huge title windows and dynasties and make all kinds of wild predictions years ahead of time it's silly at best and honestly kind of stupid.
Jaqua92 wrote:
They're lacking depth, and they're injured.
MaxwellSmart wrote:I'm still pissed the Refs screwed Indiana....HOW the H*ll did that ref call a Kicked Ball on Nesmith and have it NOT be reviewable????
Pacers were headed for a 3 on 1 fastbreak.....Then that weak flop by DiVincenzo, being called with the game on the line SMH.
threrf23 wrote:Jaqua92 wrote:
They're lacking depth, and they're injured.
Everyone is injured. But they're lacking depth. Which is a problem, b/c even without the extra depth they had last year, they're nothing special defensively.
Defense wins championships and Minny is looking solid to that effect.
Triple7 wrote:
Savage but true. If this is true though, Jimmy is gone lol.
flintsky21 wrote:I wouldn't count Denver out just yet. They're a good road team and they're defending champs for a reason. And of course that Jokic guy. They're very capable of taking the next 2 in Minny.
I said beforehand that this Knicks and Pacers series is gonna be intense. There were some who believe that Boston won't have any problem with either, but I disagree. Boston have had trouble with the Pacers all season and they've improved defensively since. The Knicks are tough because they got great defensive guys like Boston and nobody can contain Brunson. But let's take care of the Cavs first.
playa-hater wrote:Thibs and Julius Randle killed Topin's opportunity..turns out he can play.. We already found out the Ime f*cked over Nesmith.. Some coaches are good at feeding Young players confidence while others literally stripped them of it...
