Page 24 of 27
Posted: Sat May 3, 2008 3:30 am
by meatball sub
Paul Pierce's 6th foul was all the evidence I needed to know that these games in Atlanta have been rigged in favor of the Hawks. I really don't give a **** what any of the Hawks fans will say. Ya'll have a great young team with a very bright future but you guys are not winning on your own...
Posted: Sat May 3, 2008 3:30 am
by bru87tr
celts should pack it in.
the cavs are gonna eat them for lunch. I mean LJ will eat them for lunch.
I would have never said that before this series, but its truly pathetic the celtics are going 7 with a loser team who has no shot at the championship.
Posted: Sat May 3, 2008 3:31 am
by TheCelticTruth
The Rondo Show wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
I doubt he thought he'd get a technical for throwing his headband towards the bench; it's not like he threw it in the direction of the official. No idea why a ref felt the need to make that ridiculous call in that situation and then give Pierce a technical for frustration towards a call like that. Again, it's not like he threw it in the direction of the ref. I was stunned he got T'd up for that, especially at such a crucial part of the game.
i felt like the 6th for the graze on pachulia was a little touchy but i wasnt going to bitch about that. it wasnt anything that many players on both teams have gotten away with all series so why they had to call it now i dont know...
but the technical was ridiculous, what do you expect pierce to be glad or cool with the fact he fouled out on a questionable call? and as rondo show said, his frustration was towards the bench, no refs, its a little ridiculous.
bob delaney claims hes disgusted by tim donaghy, but who is the one who was really in bed with the mafia
Posted: Sat May 3, 2008 3:32 am
by TheCelticTruth
bru87tr wrote:celts should pack it in.
the cavs are gonna eat them for lunch. I mean LJ will eat them for lunch.
I would have never said that before this series, but its truly pathetic the celtics are going 7 with a loser team who has no shot at the championship.
the celtics have played some basketball that may be as historically terrible as their defense was good in the season
Posted: Sat May 3, 2008 3:33 am
by Joebiscuit
Also we should not take for granted that we will win in game 7. I remember clear as day when the celtics lost to the Knicks in game 5 where Ewing hit a 3.
Anything can happen. Celtics could lay an egg like they did against the Bobcats or Sixers and be be done.
Posted: Sat May 3, 2008 3:33 am
by TheCelticTruth
oh great and now wiretap is stating kobe will be mvp, despite how superior chris paul is
this is the worst night ive had as a basketball fan in a looooooong time
Posted: Sat May 3, 2008 3:33 am
by mr_sunshine
bstein14 wrote:The Pierce technical really energized the crowd and team.
He lost his composure and it could have been the difference in the game.
The foul had already been called, why throw your head band like that in such an important game?
Even if the Celtics win game 7 (which I would bet on) I have my doubts as to whether or not they'll keep their composure against a much most experienced, playoff tested Cavs team.
Maybe he took lessons from Sheed on how to have an emotional meltdown and throw his headband? I dunno.
Posted: Sat May 3, 2008 3:34 am
by Hairy Midget
You guys really blaming the refs for a 66 win team going 7 games against a 37 win team in the playoffs?
Posted: Sat May 3, 2008 3:36 am
by TheCelticTruth
Hairy Midget wrote:You guys really blaming the refs for a 66 win team going 7 games against a 37 win team in the playoffs?
im not so petty as to put it all on the refs, but there has been some legit favoritism cards played in the ATL.
now anyone who doesnt expect the home team to get some preference in a playoff series in the nba probably has never watched the nba playoffs, but the margin of preference has been much greater for the hawks in ATL than the Cs in BOS
Posted: Sat May 3, 2008 3:36 am
by Harry10
TheCelticTruth wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
i felt like the 6th for the graze on pachulia was a little touchy but i wasnt going to bitch about that. it wasnt anything that many players on both teams have gotten away with all series so why they had to call it now i dont know...
but the technical was ridiculous, what do you expect pierce to be glad or cool with the fact he fouled out on a questionable call? and as rondo show said, his frustration was towards the bench, no refs, its a little ridiculous.
bob delaney claims hes disgusted by tim donaghy, but who is the one who was really in bed with the mafia
it might be questionable, but really, what possess a player to grab another player with both arms when you are sitting on 5 fouls.... as a matter of fact, what lack of instict do you have to hug another player with zero fouls.
but anyway, the tech was a tech, we don't know what exactly Paul said to the ref, but i think he got the tech because he was slow in getting off the court.
Posted: Sat May 3, 2008 3:36 am
by mr_sunshine
Retrovision wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Retrovision wrote:
Its going to be a good one, Hawks use home-cooked officiating and nearly 2:1 FT ratio to muster a 3 point win.
Close Enough
Fixed.
Posted: Sat May 3, 2008 3:37 am
by The Rondo Show
Hairy Midget wrote:You guys really blaming the refs for a 66 win team going 7 games against a 37 win team in the playoffs?
No, we are really blaming the refs for calling a one-sided, **** game and making calls that haven't been made all year at the most important part of the game.
But thanks for your concern, chief.
Posted: Sat May 3, 2008 3:37 am
by Celtics_Champs
TheCelticTruth wrote:oh great and now wiretap is stating kobe will be mvp, despite how superior chris paul is
this is the worst night ive had as a basketball fan in a looooooong time
Tell me about it. CP3 deserved it, yet no. Oh man, I am going to be sick. We better win in game 7.
Posted: Sat May 3, 2008 3:37 am
by EvadedHavoc
Hairy Midget wrote:You guys really blaming the refs for a 66 win team going 7 games against a 37 win team in the playoffs?
The only thing about the Refs i didnt like was that bogus 6th foul on Pierce.
Posted: Sat May 3, 2008 3:37 am
by TheCelticTruth
if the celtics had twice the FTs the hawks did i would think something was wrong too. ive never played in a basketball game where a team fouled twice as much
Posted: Sat May 3, 2008 3:37 am
by ramshackle75
Hairy Midget wrote:You guys really blaming the refs for a 66 win team going 7 games against a 37 win team in the playoffs?
Yep.
Posted: Sat May 3, 2008 3:38 am
by gf2020hotmail
The Rondo Show wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
I doubt he thought he'd get a technical for throwing his headband towards the bench; it's not like he threw it in the direction of the official. No idea why a ref felt the need to make that ridiculous call in that situation and then give Pierce a technical for frustration towards a call like that. Again, it's not like he threw it in the direction of the ref. I was stunned he got T'd up for that, especially at such a crucial part of the game.
Throwing your headband while on the court, no matter where you are aiming it is pretty much always an automatic technical, even in the playoffs. Udonis Haslem got one in a series against the Bulls in a similar situation. Paul probably wasn't thinking about it at all, which was the problem.
Posted: Sat May 3, 2008 3:38 am
by TheCelticTruth
Harry10 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
it might be questionable, but really, what possess a player to grab another player with both arms when you are sitting on 5 fouls.... as a matter of fact, what lack of instict do you have to hug another player with zero fouls.
but anyway, the tech was a tech, we don't know what exactly Paul said to the ref, but i think he got the tech because he was slow in getting off the court.
well you can say there was grabbing, and i wont even say you were wrong because the replays i saw were pretty far out in terms of zoom, but it looked more like pierce reached over pachulia and tangled him up than that he grabbed him. i never argue a grab foul call, whether they get called both ways or not. i was a dirty defender but there are lines you shouldnt cross
Posted: Sat May 3, 2008 3:38 am
by meatball sub
TheCelticTruth wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
im not so petty as to put it all on the refs, but there has been some legit favoritism cards played in the ATL.
now anyone who doesnt expect the home team to get some preference in a playoff series in the nba probably has never watched the nba playoffs, but the margin of preference has been much greater for the hawks in ATL than the Cs in BOS
Ok, you summed up how I feel in a very level headed way. Thank you, I'm way too pissed off to explain how I feel right now.
Posted: Sat May 3, 2008 3:39 am
by mr_sunshine
Hairy Midget wrote:You guys really blaming the refs for a 66 win team going 7 games against a 37 win team in the playoffs?
If you don't think there's any officiating discrepancy you're blind.