How does a JO to Toronto thread turn into a discussion of a Bucks back up point guard?
Just asking
JO to Toronto done deal.
Moderators: bisme37, canman1971, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Froob, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman
Re: JO to Toronto done deal.
- GWVan
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,021
- And1: 2,549
- Joined: Dec 12, 2002
- Location: The world's most famous beach
Re: JO to Toronto done deal.
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 1,844
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 06, 2008
Re: JO to Toronto done deal.
GWVan wrote:How does a JO to Toronto thread turn into a discussion of a Bucks back up point guard?
Just asking
that Bucks back up point guard, in the eyes of many passed up their starting pg-------- its all my doing.
the discussion turning into this is very illogical, good question .
Re: JO to Toronto done deal.
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,238
- And1: 1
- Joined: Feb 18, 2004
Re: JO to Toronto done deal.
Great move for Toronto. Yeah, J.O. is injury prone, but so is Ford so that works out to something of a wash. And fact is, when healthy, J.O. is one of the elite bigs in the game. He's no KG/Duncan, but other than those two guys there isn't another PF in the NBA that is definitively better than a healthy, motivated J.O. He also can play center very effectively, and hence adds nice versatility.
Re: JO to Toronto done deal.
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,790
- And1: 2,335
- Joined: Oct 26, 2005
Re: JO to Toronto done deal.
RamonSessions wrote:from what I recall his avgs were up in this region
17 ppg , 10-12 rpg, 1.7 bpg, at least 1 apg
Lets compare Bogut with Perkins (the one who now has a ring)
Bogut 35 mpg FGA 12 Pts 14 rbs 10 blk 1.7 Draft picked #1 overall 2005
Perk 24.5 mpg FGA 4.5 Pts 7 rbs 6 blk 1.5 Draft 27th in 2003
So with a 2/3 less attempts Perk has only 1/2 as many pts. If you adjust the min he probably has as many rebounds per game (and Perk actually plays defense). With one of the premier shot blockers next to him he still averaged the same number of blocks as Bogut.
I have no illusions about who and what Perk is. Bogut is actually very comparable to him, but you think hes going to be a great player. I hope you are right, but the numbers don't really make your case for you.
Re: JO to Toronto done deal.
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,701
- And1: 3,752
- Joined: Feb 10, 2006
Re: JO to Toronto done deal.
Well, if Bogut plays a full year like he did after the All Star Game, he's in for a very good season, especially if Skiles gets him to play more D than swatting shots off the ball. After the ASG, he averaged:
16.3 PPG, 11.6 RPG, 2.8 APG (2.5 TO), 1 SPG, 1.7 BPG, 51.1% FG
He improved in basically every category as the season went on except for blocks. With a crop of weak centers in the East outside of Howard, Bogut might very well be the 2nd-best C in the east. Worthy of his #1 pick? I think he needs to give more than 16 PPG to prove that, but he's on his way at age 23.
16.3 PPG, 11.6 RPG, 2.8 APG (2.5 TO), 1 SPG, 1.7 BPG, 51.1% FG
He improved in basically every category as the season went on except for blocks. With a crop of weak centers in the East outside of Howard, Bogut might very well be the 2nd-best C in the east. Worthy of his #1 pick? I think he needs to give more than 16 PPG to prove that, but he's on his way at age 23.
Re: JO to Toronto done deal.
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,777
- And1: 13
- Joined: Jan 03, 2007
- Location: Leftcoast of the USA
Re: JO to Toronto done deal.
So far from this thread I now understand,JOsucks,Bogut sucks, Ford who cares and MIL will take the title next year. MIL will do this with a backup PG. Who knew all of this before today?
Re: JO to Toronto done deal.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,632
- And1: 4,431
- Joined: Mar 22, 2004
Re: JO to Toronto done deal.
I'll give that Ramon Sessions is currently a better player than GG, and probably good enough to be a starter next season. I'll give that Bogut is decent. And a new coach can only help. But I'll also give that Charlie V sucks, Desmond Mason sucks, and overall the Bucks lack depth behind Michael Redd who is not even extremely close to being an elite player in this league.
Thats all besides the point though. Yeah Ford isn't all that much better than what Indy could have drafted in a previous year. Who cares.
Thats all besides the point though. Yeah Ford isn't all that much better than what Indy could have drafted in a previous year. Who cares.
Re: JO to Toronto done deal.
- MyInsatiableOne
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,319
- And1: 180
- Joined: Mar 25, 2005
- Location: Midwest via New England
- Contact:
Re: JO to Toronto done deal.
^^Well they have Richard Jefferson now so who knows? Still a mediocre team.
Redd is super overrated...a less skilled, less-all-around player version of Ray Allen.
Redd is super overrated...a less skilled, less-all-around player version of Ray Allen.
Re: JO to Toronto done deal.
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,777
- And1: 13
- Joined: Jan 03, 2007
- Location: Leftcoast of the USA
Re: JO to Toronto done deal.
The only thing Allen and Redd have in common is their stroke. that is where it ends.
Re: JO to Toronto done deal.
- Taget
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,167
- And1: 2,628
- Joined: Apr 24, 2004
Re: JO to Toronto done deal.
I love TJ but those injuries worry the hell out of me. Good deal for Toronto.
Re: JO to Toronto done deal.
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,149
- And1: 1,130
- Joined: Feb 16, 2005
- Location: Ottawa
Re: JO to Toronto done deal.
bruno sundov wrote:RamonSessions wrote:"you language" ? Canada is also bilingual, and if I was in Toronto which I am not, I am in Milwaukee, WI ----- I wouldn't be of the French-speaking mold- that's Quebec.
So every year when I go to Montreal they speak in french automatically by accident?
So anyway you live in the sticks of MIL. Now that makes sense. What were you trying to say in the previous post? I just have to know now.
Hey Genius! Montreal is in Quebec.
Re: JO to Toronto done deal.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,632
- And1: 4,431
- Joined: Mar 22, 2004
Re: JO to Toronto done deal.
So is this trade off now?
If so, Indy looks good right now, Toronto drafted Rafael Araujo part II (IMO). Or if it is still on, maybe Jim O'brien gets Mark Blount part II. Or maybe Hibbert 'll prove me wrong
If so, Indy looks good right now, Toronto drafted Rafael Araujo part II (IMO). Or if it is still on, maybe Jim O'brien gets Mark Blount part II. Or maybe Hibbert 'll prove me wrong