Page 1 of 2

Re: OT: Lakers should agree to an Artest and Thomas for Odom

Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 8:28 pm
by dingodile
I just don't see how this helps Sac Town. Assuming they would let Lamar walk at season's end, then the only benefit of the deal is shedding Kenny Thomas' contract. But only two more years remain on his deal, so they'd only save themselves one year and they're not paying the luxury tax. Also, it appears that they're planing on making a push for the free agent class of 2010, not 2009, as Miller, SAR, and Thomas' contracts all expire at that time.

So it all boils down to this... Sac would only get out of Thomas' contract one year early, while they would potentially make the Lakers (not only a conference, but a division opponent) very strong for many years to come. Just doesn't add up.

Re: OT: Lakers should agree to an Artest and Thomas for Odom

Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 12:07 am
by DEEP3CL
dingodile wrote:I just don't see how this helps Sac Town. Assuming they would let Lamar walk at season's end, then the only benefit of the deal is shedding Kenny Thomas' contract. Just doesn't add up.
You just answered your own thoughts. Adds up fine in Sac Town and LA quite well.

Kings get cap space and could be a major player in 09 free agent sweep stakes. And Lakers get a SF who can defend and a over paid PF who hustles and gives you what Ronny does, plus his contract give the Lakers decent space after the 09-10 season.

Re: OT: Lakers should agree to an Artest and Thomas for Odom

Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 12:34 am
by campybatman
One point which is being missed is: The Lakers are getting Artest at a bargain assuming if this trade were to go through. Because how much in salary would the Lakers have had committed to Artest had he opted out? Remember Artest was attracting enough interest from other teams besides the Lakers to drive up his price. You would've had to sign him to a contract higher than the MLE.

Re: OT: Lakers should agree to an Artest and Thomas for Odom

Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 4:56 am
by dingodile
DEEP3CL wrote:
dingodile wrote:I just don't see how this helps Sac Town. Assuming they would let Lamar walk at season's end, then the only benefit of the deal is shedding Kenny Thomas' contract. Just doesn't add up.
You just answered your own thoughts. Adds up fine in Sac Town and LA quite well.

Kings get cap space and could be a major player in 09 free agent sweep stakes. And Lakers get a SF who can defend and a over paid PF who hustles and gives you what Ronny does, plus his contract give the Lakers decent space after the 09-10 season.


Maybe you should have kept reading.

Re: OT: Lakers should agree to an Artest and Thomas for Odom

Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 9:22 am
by MVP4LIFE
I think the Lakers should take a chance on this one. In potential they'd have a fantastic team and balance. Kobe and Phil should be able to calm down Artest.
Artest and the Kings won't work anymore after his latest comments. Besides, I never heard anything about Artest being such a good factor on the Kings. Maybe these stories are now out there, to up his value? But I haven't been following the Kings and Artest very closely, so maybe I'm wrong about his role on the Kings.. But I also believe Lamar Odom is a great player and someone who could help the Kings.

Re: OT: Lakers should agree to an Artest and Thomas for Odom

Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 11:21 am
by GuyClinch
Of course the Lakers should do it. But Sac might as well just hold Kenny Thomas for the extra year though and turn his negative into a positive. They aren't at the cap - and they are not going to go broke with the Maloofs in charge.

This sounds more like a dream for the Lakers then anything positive for the Kings..

Re: OT: Lakers should agree to an Artest and Thomas for Odom

Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 11:44 pm
by rambo_ortega
i think odom will be playing well in the kings style and would greatly contribute especially on offense.

with the lakers, getting artest and kt is really huge for them. artest is the best they can get fromwhat they need at the starting sf spot in an elite level while kt can fill turiaf's void and bring toughness off the bench to match the intensity of someone like powe.

Re: OT: Lakers should agree to an Artest and Thomas for Odom

Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 12:09 am
by campybatman
This is becoming odd now.


In a series of e-mails he sent to ESPN.com late Saturday and early Sunday, Artest continued to lament his decision to pass on an opportunity to become a free agent July 1 by announcing that he is now representing himself without an agent and expressing hope that he will soon be traded to "a team out there that can be more committed than Sacramento to me."

That team is believed to be the Los Angeles Lakers. Almost from the minute they were routed by the Boston Celtics in Game 6 of the NBA Finals -- which Artest attended in Boston to root for friends Kobe Bryant and Lamar Odom -- it has been strongly expected throughout the league that the Lakers would revisit their longstanding trade interest in Artest and eventually acquire the enigmatic forward sometime this summer to address the defense and toughness issues that the Celtics exposed.

But NBA front-office sources told ESPN.com on Sunday that the Lakers -- fond as they are of Artest and confident as they are that they can get the best out of him through Phil Jackson's coaching and Artest's respect for Bryant -- are reluctant to part with Odom in an Artest swap. That stance, if the Lakers hold firm, would almost certainly prompt Sacramento to look elsewhere for a trade partner.

The most consistent trade chatter involving Artest suggests that the Kings would want Odom in return for Artest and Kings forward Kenny Thomas.

Artest, for his part, is now openly pushing for a move, telling ESPN.com that he's suddenly feeling a chill from Kings co-owners Joe and Gavin Maloof in the same desert where, just two summers ago in 2006, Joe Maloof proclaimed him to be the new "face of our franchise."


http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=3485534

Re: OT: Lakers should agree to an Artest and Thomas for Odom

Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 1:25 am
by meatball sub
if the laker board killed mangina, me-sa gonna be pissed off.

Re: OT: Lakers should agree to an Artest and Thomas for Odom

Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 2:58 am
by JCizzle
bove310 wrote:if the laker board killed mangina, me-sa gonna be pissed off.


**** bitches.

Re: OT: Lakers should agree to an Artest and Thomas for Odom

Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 3:30 am
by sully00
They cannot know the curse they are bringing down on their house.

Let those Fakers rot in a steaming pot of their own fear.

WAR MANG.

Re: OT: Lakers should agree to an Artest and Thomas for Odom

Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 1:29 pm
by MyInsatiableOne
GuyClinch wrote:Of course the Lakers should do it. But Sac might as well just hold Kenny Thomas for the extra year though and turn his negative into a positive. They aren't at the cap - and they are not going to go broke with the Maloofs in charge.

This sounds more like a dream for the Lakers then anything positive for the Kings..


This^ although who knows, maybe Stern will force the Kings to do this...just like how he looked the other way when they "traded" for Gasol... 8-) :lol:

Re: OT: Lakers should agree to an Artest and Thomas for Odom

Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 8:46 pm
by campybatman
Well, now Miami is in the picture for Artest. Marion in exchange for Artest and Thomas. I would act on it if I were the Heat but that would mean Artest in the east and getting under Pierce's skin.

Re: OT: Lakers should agree to an Artest and Thomas for Odom

Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:02 am
by sully00
I understand the idea of Odom for Artest. I like Odom a lot but he is a PF not a SF especially defensively and he also needs the ball in his hands. So for LA Artest is a true SF with toughness, defense, and he can score even if completely crazy. I also think Odom would be a nice pick up for the Kings and there line up.

Artest to Miami is just stupid. Marion is a better player and not crazy and can play the 3 or the 4. Because of his game and salary Marion should be able to land Miami more than Artest and an overpaid backup PF.

Re: OT: Lakers should agree to an Artest and Thomas for Odom

Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 9:03 pm
by tdfoss
threrf23 wrote:Kings are not a great team to begin with, and they'd be losing their best player. Odom's good but not as good as Artest.

But, Bynum/Gasol/Artest/Kobe/Whoever, with serviceable role players on the bench, would put LA in a hell of a position if this rumor is credible.


If you go to nba.com look at Odom's and Artests CAREER stats, they are almost identical. Actually Odoms are slightly better. Last year Odom was the 3rd option, Artest was a #1 option on a lesser team.

Re: OT: Lakers should agree to an Artest and Thomas for Odom

Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:35 am
by campybatman
sully00 wrote:Artest to Miami is just stupid. Marion is a better player and not crazy and can play the 3 or the 4. Because of his game and salary Marion should be able to land Miami more than Artest and an overpaid backup PF.



Purely, from a talent standpoint, I would rather have Artest ahead of Marion. To me, Artest does so many things for your team defensively and he has improved offensively. Yes, Artest can be a mental case but he's arguable one of the best defensive small forwards in the league along with players such as Bowen, Battier and G. Wallace. Not to mention, with his size and height, he can guard multiple positions and can start at or back up the small forward and shooting guard positions. Conversely, Marion has an ego to match his salary. I think Marion's a better rebounder and is more athletic. But, I believe Artest could do just as many things you ask of him as Marion.

A trade between Miami and Sacramento is good for Marion's ego. He'll only have to share the spotlight with K. Martin. Actually, Odom probably makes more sense going to the Heat than the Kings. Riley is said to still like Odom. And having Odom affords you more time to develop Beasley into a power forward. Maybe they start them both together.

Re: OT: Lakers should agree to an Artest and Thomas for Odom

Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 7:15 am
by GuyClinch
^^^ Agreed. Marion certainly plays his A game more often. But Artest at his best was better then Marion IMHO. Marion is very limited in what he can do WITH the ball. he is amazingly effective off the ball but I remember watching him and Joe Johnson in a Suns playoff battle and thinking how much better JJ is when you NEED to get a bucket.

Pete

Re: OT: Lakers should agree to an Artest and Thomas for Odom

Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 4:47 pm
by campybatman
Add Dallas to the mix. Reportedly, the Mavericks could offer the expiring contract of Stackhouse and Bass for Artest. However, it isn't mentioned if Thomas is involved...



The Kings would probably like Josh Howard from Dallas but as the Los Angeles Lakers are reluctant to part with Lamar Odom, Artest's "difficult" personality will probably prevent Sacramento from landing such well established players.

Bass may garner interest elsewhere if the Mavs truly want to move him, but the Kings aren't the slightest bit interested in acquiring him for Artest. HoopsWorld

Re: OT: Lakers should agree to an Artest and Thomas for Odom

Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 11:58 pm
by campybatman
This is interesting considering that there were enough people on here that wanted K. Brown to make one cringe.



Faced with a “weird” situation with center Andrew Bynum, the Los Angeles Lakers are toying with the thought of bringing back Kwame Brown, a free agent.


The Lakers made it to the NBA Finals last season and found themselves in a collection of dire mismatches with Boston. For starters, Los Angeles had no one to contend with Celtics center Kendrick Perkins’ size and strength. “They could have used Kwame in the Finals,” said one Lakers insider.


Tex Winter, the longtime coach and team consultant, was in Las Vegas to evaluate the Lakers’ summer league team. Winter said he is totally out of the loop on personnel decisions with the team and hadn’t heard of the Kwame deliberation, but Winter said it makes sense, especially for Lakers coach Phil Jackson. “Phil has always liked Kwame,” Winter said. “Phil’s always felt that defensively he’s pretty good.”


Then there’s Jackson’s fascination with Sacramento forward Ron Artest. Would the Lakers trade Lamar Odom to get him? Jeanie Buss supposedly insists that Odom is safe, but the Busses are moving through another summer of discontent, looking for an answer. HoopsHype.com

Re: OT: Lakers should agree to an Artest and Thomas for Odom

Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2008 10:38 pm
by GuyClinch
Kwame is likely better then POB will ever be. I know that's sad but its the truth.