Image Image Image Image

Barrett traded to SD!

Howling Mad
General Manager
Posts: 8,993
And1: 585
Joined: Jun 28, 2006

Barrett traded to SD! 

Post#1 » by Howling Mad » Wed Jun 20, 2007 1:38 pm

Just reported by Mike and Mike, Barrett traded to SD for player to be named later(not officially, but still waiting on who it was).

I actually liked Barrett, o'well, good luck Michael!
Howling Mad
General Manager
Posts: 8,993
And1: 585
Joined: Jun 28, 2006

 

Post#2 » by Howling Mad » Wed Jun 20, 2007 2:16 pm

...traded for backup SD catcher Rob Bowen.
User avatar
Posey H8er
RealGM
Posts: 20,095
And1: 64
Joined: Jan 07, 2007

 

Post#3 » by Posey H8er » Wed Jun 20, 2007 2:47 pm

What the hell!? I just woke up and logged on and it says Barrett was traded! So we can't have those Barrett/Dye Cubs/Sox McDonald's Rivalry commercials anymore, lol. So we basically got crap for him? Good job Hendry.
User avatar
GYBE
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 9,000
And1: 358
Joined: Feb 14, 2005
Location: Kanada

 

Post#4 » by GYBE » Wed Jun 20, 2007 2:53 pm

How does Bowen help us? Our offense has struggled for most of the year and we trade one our 5 best hitters. Why not just play out the year and let him walk, or at least trade him for a prospect or something.

Edit: It will be interesting to see how this affects San Diego's pitching, which so far has been by far the best in baseball. We'll see if Barrett can't handle pitchers, or if he just can't handle Cubs pitchers.

8)
Howling Mad
General Manager
Posts: 8,993
And1: 585
Joined: Jun 28, 2006

 

Post#5 » by Howling Mad » Wed Jun 20, 2007 2:57 pm

hey GYBE i know you were looking for tickets for the Cubby game, I have a 99% fool proof way to get them. I tried to PM you but I dont' know if its working, how can I contact you?

I really don't wanna share my super secret way... lol.
User avatar
northbrookTIM
Veteran
Posts: 2,535
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 26, 2003
Location: Northbrook, where else

 

Post#6 » by northbrookTIM » Wed Jun 20, 2007 3:56 pm

Kyler Burke is gonna be great!?!?!
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 41,957
And1: 11,218
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

 

Post#7 » by Scoot McGroot » Wed Jun 20, 2007 4:13 pm

I guess Barrett may have been even worse in the clubhouse than suspected. This looks like a dump just to get rid of his personality. Getting back a somewhat solid catcher and a prospect of some sorts isn't awful, but losing Barrett's offense will hurt a bit.
User avatar
2poor
RealGM
Posts: 11,684
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 17, 2006
Location: I'm from the city in the midwest best city in the whole wide wide world

 

Post#8 » by 2poor » Wed Jun 20, 2007 4:22 pm

Not a huge surprise. I liked Barrett up until his most recent transgressions, I just hope this has a positive influence on the club. Hopefully Koyie Hill is ready for the extra work as well. His bat has been, ehm, sub-par.

We need Aramis back ASAP. :pray:
User avatar
Posey H8er
RealGM
Posts: 20,095
And1: 64
Joined: Jan 07, 2007

 

Post#9 » by Posey H8er » Wed Jun 20, 2007 5:01 pm

Barret was an important asset to this team until this year. He was one of the top 5 catchers in the league when he joined the cubs IMO. The ability to hit .300 and hit 20 homers. :noway:
User avatar
Basketball Jesus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,180
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
Location: P-nuts + hair doos

 

Post#10 » by Basketball Jesus » Wed Jun 20, 2007 5:14 pm

I find it odd that this was all Chicago could get. Either it was a sheer panic move to trade him this fast or Barrett has a worse reputation around the league than I thought.
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
User avatar
GYBE
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 9,000
And1: 358
Joined: Feb 14, 2005
Location: Kanada

 

Post#11 » by GYBE » Wed Jun 20, 2007 5:25 pm

Okay, so we did get a prospect, it's not as bad as I thought. Still a badly timed move, especially in the midst of A-Ram's injury and Lee's upcoming suspension.

Kyler Burke was apparently once considered one of the top high school players in the country...but looking at his stats it doesn't look that way.

8)
User avatar
Jo Jo English
RealGM
Posts: 16,405
And1: 4,981
Joined: Mar 29, 2007
Location: Vacation
     

 

Post#12 » by Jo Jo English » Wed Jun 20, 2007 6:32 pm

GYBE... exactly. If they wanted to move Barrett at least they could have waited until Aramis' return and after Derrek Lee's suspension. They really could have used his offense during this upcoming stretch of games.

Things must have been far worse with Barrett than any of us realized. Otherwise Hendry was an idiot for moving Barrett for what, to me at least, is next to nothing. Honestly I'd rather have Koyie Hill as our starting catcher rather than Rob Bowen.

Way to go Hendry.
treyZz
Banned User
Posts: 5,326
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 18, 2006

 

Post#13 » by treyZz » Wed Jun 20, 2007 6:43 pm

The prospect is very toolsy.

Drafted #35 overall last year.. SD rushed Burke up the ladder and little quickly, but he's still a good prospect.

If being an OFer doesn't work out he has a future as a reliever.

I like the trade - Barrett was terrible.
User avatar
IlliniNRG
Rookie
Posts: 1,229
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 10, 2002
Location: Lincoln Square

 

Post#14 » by IlliniNRG » Wed Jun 20, 2007 6:55 pm

It looks like a bad trade on a name-for-name basis, but it's not awful.

The catcher the Cubs got back is actually having a better offensive (and assumedly defensive) year than Barrett, is 5 years younger, and doesn't start fights with his teammates.

The Cubs were obviously not going to resign Barrett at the end of this year anyway, so they got what they could for him - an average-ish replacement and a prospect.

It's probably not a 'win' of a trade, but then, the Cubs were the ones dealing from weakness. They clearly really wanted to get rid of the guy.
The-Rejuvenated
Banned User
Posts: 1,893
And1: 0
Joined: May 11, 2007

 

Post#15 » by The-Rejuvenated » Wed Jun 20, 2007 6:58 pm

Yeah, interesting stuff. I had mixed feelings about Barrett, sometimes he'd start problems and do poorly on offense, sometimes he'd be clutch, but hopefully we can replace him.
User avatar
IbreakNeckZ101
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,870
And1: 58
Joined: Jan 21, 2007
Location: Skokie, Illinois

 

Post#16 » by IbreakNeckZ101 » Wed Jun 20, 2007 7:15 pm

Michael barrett was nothing but a plague on this team since 2004... am i happy he's gone??? YOU DAMN BET IM HAPPY!!!
User avatar
IbreakNeckZ101
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,870
And1: 58
Joined: Jan 21, 2007
Location: Skokie, Illinois

 

Post#17 » by IbreakNeckZ101 » Wed Jun 20, 2007 7:18 pm

Ohh and its funny how all the regulars in this board all agree that barrett was done... and all the new ppl are mad that he got traded...
Abraham Lincoln
Banned User
Posts: 4,330
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 05, 2007

 

Post#18 » by Abraham Lincoln » Wed Jun 20, 2007 8:07 pm

Zambrano the cancer strikes again.
User avatar
GYBE
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 9,000
And1: 358
Joined: Feb 14, 2005
Location: Kanada

 

Post#19 » by GYBE » Wed Jun 20, 2007 8:10 pm

treyZz wrote:Drafted #35 overall last year.. SD rushed Burke up the ladder and little quickly, but he's still a good prospect.


Makes sense SD would rush him, they're desperate for offensive help. Where would you rank him in the Cubs system? Top 5? I know we don't have a lot of high ceiling prospects.

8)
User avatar
Jo Jo English
RealGM
Posts: 16,405
And1: 4,981
Joined: Mar 29, 2007
Location: Vacation
     

 

Post#20 » by Jo Jo English » Wed Jun 20, 2007 8:11 pm

IbreakNeckZ101 wrote:Ohh and its funny how all the regulars in this board all agree that barrett was done... and all the new ppl are mad that he got traded...


So which would you consider me? Never in my post did I say that keeping Barrett for the longhaul was a good idea. My only issue with it was the timing. It was clear to everyone that Barrett's time in Chicago was coming to an end, I just wish we could have gotten a bit more back in a trade for one of the better offensive catchers in baseball. Also if we had decided to move him, fine, just do it after Derrek Lee has served his time and Ramirez was back off of the DL.

Like I said in my earlier post, I am fine with Koyie Hill. I think the Cubs, when at full strength, will maybe be a better team with him calling the game.

Return to Chicago Cubs