ImageImageImage

Refs don't give the hawks 50 fts, they lose by 40

Moderators: bisme37, canman1971, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Froob, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman

GonzoLays
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,092
And1: 185
Joined: Jun 16, 2003
Location: The strongest man is he who stands alone in the face of oppression and censorship.
   

Refs don't give the hawks 50 fts, they lose by 40 

Post#1 » by GonzoLays » Sun May 4, 2008 7:30 pm

Ooooh, so this is what the score should look like when the refs don't give the Hawks 50 fts a game. Call the game even, and we win by 30. Gotcha.

Good lookin' out, refs.
meatball sub
RealGM
Posts: 27,348
And1: 8,743
Joined: May 28, 2004
Location: in your mouth

 

Post#2 » by meatball sub » Sun May 4, 2008 7:36 pm

I'm going to say one more thing on this subject and then put it to rest:

I 100% agree.
Athanacropolis
Analyst
Posts: 3,321
And1: 3
Joined: Feb 28, 2005

 

Post#3 » by Athanacropolis » Sun May 4, 2008 7:41 pm

Come now Gonzo, no need to be a sore winner! :lol:

But while I'm here: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: Too true!
NDaATL
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,758
And1: 520
Joined: Nov 08, 2004
Location: ATL. ^^ 22 on the shot clock.
 

 

Post#4 » by NDaATL » Sun May 4, 2008 7:59 pm

Please, ATL got at LEAST as many bad calls as Boston did. The fact that y'all have complained about that is just annoying, stop. We were screwed by the refs probably MORE.
User avatar
SkillzDatKillz
Senior
Posts: 700
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 16, 2007

 

Post#5 » by SkillzDatKillz » Sun May 4, 2008 8:01 pm

I'm a Bulls fan, and I have to say I thought the Hawks got screwed over by the Refs more than the C's.
Image
Athanacropolis
Analyst
Posts: 3,321
And1: 3
Joined: Feb 28, 2005

 

Post#6 » by Athanacropolis » Sun May 4, 2008 8:01 pm

^^^^^^ Reffing sucks the entire league throughout. You are 100% right about that. We're just poking fun at that fact (and at the conspiracy theorists on this board), that's all.

It was a hell of a series, regardless of the refs!
Big Baby
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,336
And1: 656
Joined: Feb 09, 2006

 

Post#7 » by Big Baby » Sun May 4, 2008 8:23 pm

SkillzDatKillz wrote:I'm a Bulls fan, and I have to say I thought the Hawks got screwed over by the Refs more than the C's.

When the facts don't support your argument, resort to your "thoughts." Are you from Kansas?
GonzoLays
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,092
And1: 185
Joined: Jun 16, 2003
Location: The strongest man is he who stands alone in the face of oppression and censorship.
   

 

Post#8 » by GonzoLays » Sun May 4, 2008 8:23 pm

SkillzDatKillz wrote:I'm a Bulls fan, and I have to say I thought the Hawks got screwed over by the Refs more than the C's.


I can see how you say that when the Hawks had like a +70 free throw advantage over the Celtics; common sense just tells you that.
User avatar
SuperDeluxe
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,971
And1: 20,886
Joined: Feb 23, 2003
Location: Celtic Nation
   

 

Post#9 » by SuperDeluxe » Sun May 4, 2008 8:25 pm

SkillzDatKillz wrote:I'm a Bulls fan, and I have to say I thought the Hawks got screwed over by the Refs more than the C's.


Wait, you are not a Celtics or Hawks fans and you watched the 7 games of this particular series?

I thought so.
User avatar
Bleeding Green
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,178
And1: 13,875
Joined: Feb 28, 2005
Location: Atlantic Champs OMG OMG OMG!

 

Post#10 » by Bleeding Green » Sun May 4, 2008 8:28 pm

Celtics just didn't foul as much. Stop with this ref bull.
Manocad wrote:I have an engineering degree, an exceptionally high IQ, and can point to the exact location/area of any country on an unlabeled globe.
Athanacropolis
Analyst
Posts: 3,321
And1: 3
Joined: Feb 28, 2005

 

Post#11 » by Athanacropolis » Sun May 4, 2008 8:28 pm

Bleeding Green: Nice sig! :lol:
User avatar
sh00n
RealGM
Posts: 20,403
And1: 1,969
Joined: Jul 15, 2006
Location: Montreal
Contact:
       

 

Post#12 » by sh00n » Sun May 4, 2008 9:12 pm

SuperDeluxe wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Wait, you are not a Celtics or Hawks fans and you watched the 7 games of this particular series?

I thought so.

I watched all 7, and I think the Celtics got the benefit of the doubt most nights. Not to mention Stern not suspending KG for pushing the ref.
User avatar
Al n' Perk No Layups!
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,532
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 30, 2006

 

Post#13 » by Al n' Perk No Layups! » Sun May 4, 2008 9:19 pm

sh00n wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


I watched all 7, and I think the Celtics got the benefit of the doubt most nights. Not to mention Stern not suspending KG for pushing the ref.


Ignoring the fact that the ref who got "pushed" didn't even call a foul on Garnett for the alleged infraction nor did any of the other refs. But keep telling yourself Stern saved the Celts. Whatever helps you sleep at night.
User avatar
SuperDeluxe
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,971
And1: 20,886
Joined: Feb 23, 2003
Location: Celtic Nation
   

 

Post#14 » by SuperDeluxe » Sun May 4, 2008 9:28 pm

sh00n wrote:I watched all 7, and I think the Celtics got the benefit of the doubt most nights. Not to mention Stern not suspending KG for pushing the ref.


Well, that's your opinion. Considering you have trolled this board before, I won't give a crap about it.
Big Baby
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,336
And1: 656
Joined: Feb 09, 2006

 

Post#15 » by Big Baby » Sun May 4, 2008 10:26 pm

sh00n wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


I watched all 7, and I think the Celtics got the benefit of the doubt most nights. Not to mention Stern not suspending KG for pushing the ref.

And I bet you believe in Tooth Fairies, too.

NBA...where a troll thinks that having a -70 in FT discrepancy is an advantage happens.
User avatar
SonicYouth34
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,575
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 25, 2008
Contact:

 

Post#16 » by SonicYouth34 » Sun May 4, 2008 10:27 pm

Just imagine how many calls LBJ is gonna get, Pierce is gonna foul out every game
Celtics! Horah!
Celtics! Horah!
Celtics! Horah!
1,2,3 Ubuntu.
dclock
Freshman
Posts: 53
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 13, 2007

 

Post#17 » by dclock » Sun May 4, 2008 10:35 pm

For one thing, even with your messed up math, Hawks would win by 10, not 30. But more importantly, no guarantee they would make all 50 FTs, and also since they were doing FTs they would not have made the 2s and 3s that they made even when being fouled; even if there really were 50 times that they should have been fouled in relation to how many times the Celtics should have been found.
Big Baby
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,336
And1: 656
Joined: Feb 09, 2006

 

Post#18 » by Big Baby » Sun May 4, 2008 10:37 pm

dclock wrote:For one thing, even with your messed up math, Hawks would win by 10, not 30. But more importantly, no guarantee they would make all 50 FTs, and also since they were doing FTs they would not have made the 2s and 3s that they made even when being fouled; even if there really were 50 times that they should have been fouled in relation to how many times the Celtics should have been found.

RealGM...Where nonsense happens.
User avatar
Al n' Perk No Layups!
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,532
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 30, 2006

 

Post#19 » by Al n' Perk No Layups! » Sun May 4, 2008 10:37 pm

dclock wrote:For one thing, even with your messed up math, Hawks would win by 10, not 30. But more importantly, no guarantee they would make all 50 FTs, and also since they were doing FTs they would not have made the 2s and 3s that they made even when being fouled; even if there really were 50 times that they should have been fouled in relation to how many times the Celtics should have been found.


Gonzo is a Celts fan. When he says "call a game even and we win by 30" he means the Celts win by 30.
User avatar
MyInsatiableOne
General Manager
Posts: 9,319
And1: 180
Joined: Mar 25, 2005
Location: Midwest via New England
Contact:
     

 

Post#20 » by MyInsatiableOne » Mon May 5, 2008 1:08 pm

GonzoLays wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I can see how you say that when the Hawks had like a +70 free throw advantage over the Celtics; common sense just tells you that.


But of course!

:rofl: :rofl:
It's still 17 to 11!!!!

Return to Boston Celtics