Refs don't give the hawks 50 fts, they lose by 40
Moderators: bisme37, canman1971, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Froob, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman
Refs don't give the hawks 50 fts, they lose by 40
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,092
- And1: 185
- Joined: Jun 16, 2003
- Location: The strongest man is he who stands alone in the face of oppression and censorship.
Refs don't give the hawks 50 fts, they lose by 40
Ooooh, so this is what the score should look like when the refs don't give the Hawks 50 fts a game. Call the game even, and we win by 30. Gotcha.
Good lookin' out, refs.
Good lookin' out, refs.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,348
- And1: 8,743
- Joined: May 28, 2004
- Location: in your mouth
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,321
- And1: 3
- Joined: Feb 28, 2005
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,092
- And1: 185
- Joined: Jun 16, 2003
- Location: The strongest man is he who stands alone in the face of oppression and censorship.
- Bleeding Green
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 24,178
- And1: 13,875
- Joined: Feb 28, 2005
- Location: Atlantic Champs OMG OMG OMG!
- Al n' Perk No Layups!
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,532
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jan 30, 2006
sh00n wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
I watched all 7, and I think the Celtics got the benefit of the doubt most nights. Not to mention Stern not suspending KG for pushing the ref.
Ignoring the fact that the ref who got "pushed" didn't even call a foul on Garnett for the alleged infraction nor did any of the other refs. But keep telling yourself Stern saved the Celts. Whatever helps you sleep at night.
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,336
- And1: 656
- Joined: Feb 09, 2006
sh00n wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
I watched all 7, and I think the Celtics got the benefit of the doubt most nights. Not to mention Stern not suspending KG for pushing the ref.
And I bet you believe in Tooth Fairies, too.
NBA...where a troll thinks that having a -70 in FT discrepancy is an advantage happens.
-
- Freshman
- Posts: 53
- And1: 0
- Joined: Dec 13, 2007
For one thing, even with your messed up math, Hawks would win by 10, not 30. But more importantly, no guarantee they would make all 50 FTs, and also since they were doing FTs they would not have made the 2s and 3s that they made even when being fouled; even if there really were 50 times that they should have been fouled in relation to how many times the Celtics should have been found.
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,336
- And1: 656
- Joined: Feb 09, 2006
dclock wrote:For one thing, even with your messed up math, Hawks would win by 10, not 30. But more importantly, no guarantee they would make all 50 FTs, and also since they were doing FTs they would not have made the 2s and 3s that they made even when being fouled; even if there really were 50 times that they should have been fouled in relation to how many times the Celtics should have been found.
RealGM...Where nonsense happens.
- Al n' Perk No Layups!
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,532
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jan 30, 2006
dclock wrote:For one thing, even with your messed up math, Hawks would win by 10, not 30. But more importantly, no guarantee they would make all 50 FTs, and also since they were doing FTs they would not have made the 2s and 3s that they made even when being fouled; even if there really were 50 times that they should have been fouled in relation to how many times the Celtics should have been found.
Gonzo is a Celts fan. When he says "call a game even and we win by 30" he means the Celts win by 30.
- MyInsatiableOne
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,319
- And1: 180
- Joined: Mar 25, 2005
- Location: Midwest via New England
- Contact: