fatlever wrote:you mean the felton treatment.
No, the Okafor treatment is the opposite of the Felton treatment, silly.
The Okafor treatment involves constantly criticizing a player when we should be praising what he brings to the team, whereas the Felton treatment is constantly praising a player that deserves to be criticized.
Kinda like how you constantly dig at Okafor for all long as he's been here, and we replace him with a guy that has trouble putting up single-doubles, and you barely say a thing about him. Chandler has had all of Okafor's negatives and none of his positives.
If Okafor had put up three games like Chandler has, 95% of your posts would be taking cheapshots about the guy.
For whatever reason, you usually criticize or, if you have to, pay underhanded compliments to our best players, while holding up some of our **** guys on a pedestal. Maybe it's an underdog mentality or something. But either way, it's shown to be a losing proposition for our team.
Hate Okafor all you want, make up all the nicknames you want -- fact is, we're a better team with him. He's a better than Chandler, both as a player and apparently in whatever system it is that we run. Chandler has been absolutely horrific in every game he's played for us. If he's still injured, we should have never traded for him. If he's really this horrible, we should have never traded for him.
Through the games played so far, there has been absolutely no upside to that trade. None whatsoever.