
JoshB914 wrote:I just ran across this quote from Sekou's AJC report on the loss last night from JJ.
http://www.ajc.com/sports/atlanta-hawks ... 82411.html
"I thought we were past this but I was wrong," said Johnson, who torched the Lakers for 18 points in the first nine minutes of the game and finished with a team-high 27. "We still complain too much. To be honest, we just didn't have the effort needed to do this right. If shots aren't falling we stand around. We think offense more than defense. And you're not going to win in this league like that."
When will Joe learn? He continues to call this team out for being soft and inconsistent. But who is the captain? Why can't Joe be more vocal with his teammates during games and on the practice floor rather than voicing his concerns to the media?

parson wrote:Joe got hot in the 1st, then only scored 9 points the rest of the way, despite continuing to take the largest # of shots. Give me a break, he can't say he manned up in the crunch.
It was a team-wide lay down. When the Lakers started hacking away in the 3rd qtr, we stood around and hoped for the refs to call the fouls.
I still want to see us feed the frontcourt before we condemn them for not raising their game. The guards took the lion's share of shots -- let THEM answer for not manning up.
One more thing: Crawford is going to be hit-or-miss as our version of Vinnie Johnson (Mr. Microwave). As the old poem goes, when Crawford's good, he's very, very good; but when he's bad, he's horrid.

tontoz wrote:Smith was 3-10, Marvin 1-6, Horford 3-8. That is a combined 7-24 which doesn't argue for more looks. Smith was settling for outside shots, throwing the ball away (5 turnovers) and as usual didn't hit the boards. Marvin looked scared to do anything and Horford didn't know what to do with Bynum.
The guards are the only ones who showed up. JJ stopped hitting from the field but still got to the line 10 times. If 27 pts (and 9 rebounds) on 16 shot attempts against the champs isn't manning up then i don't know what is. Our frontcourt got clowned.
parson wrote:tontoz wrote:Smith was 3-10, Marvin 1-6, Horford 3-8. That is a combined 7-24 which doesn't argue for more looks. Smith was settling for outside shots, throwing the ball away (5 turnovers) and as usual didn't hit the boards. Marvin looked scared to do anything and Horford didn't know what to do with Bynum.
The guards are the only ones who showed up. JJ stopped hitting from the field but still got to the line 10 times. If 27 pts (and 9 rebounds) on 16 shot attempts against the champs isn't manning up then i don't know what is. Our frontcourt got clowned.
Come on, 'toz, you know I was talking about PASSING the ball down to our frontcourt. What you're talking about is our guards saying, "Here, I'm finished with the ball. YOU take the last-second shot."
Look carefully at your own words: you said Smoove's "was settling for outside shots." Here we see that our PF is having to get the ball out on the perimeter -- not one pass INTO the interior to him.
Our guards do not pass the ball in any type of programmed way; they simply give the other guys "a turn" every once in awhile.
You're telling me that our frontcourt is only shooting 7-24; I'm pointing out that Joe and Bibby control the ball and are ensuring that our frontcourt only shoots those type of lousy shots that create poor percentages such as 7 for 24.
As for Joe manning up, please note I said he scored the bulk of his points in the 1st qtr. You said if his game total "isn't manning up then i don't know what is," ignoring that I said he didn't man up in the clutch. So let me ask you:
Did Joe man up in the 2nd quarter?
Did Joe man up in the 3rd quarter?
Did Joe man up in the 4th quarter?

tontoz wrote:parson wrote:tontoz wrote:Smith was 3-10, Marvin 1-6, Horford 3-8. That is a combined 7-24 which doesn't argue for more looks. Smith was settling for outside shots, throwing the ball away (5 turnovers) and as usual didn't hit the boards. Marvin looked scared to do anything and Horford didn't know what to do with Bynum.
The guards are the only ones who showed up. JJ stopped hitting from the field but still got to the line 10 times. If 27 pts (and 9 rebounds) on 16 shot attempts against the champs isn't manning up then i don't know what is. Our frontcourt got clowned.
Come on, 'toz, you know I was talking about PASSING the ball down to our frontcourt. What you're talking about is our guards saying, "Here, I'm finished with the ball. YOU take the last-second shot."
Look carefully at your own words: you said Smoove's "was settling for outside shots." Here we see that our PF is having to get the ball out on the perimeter -- not one pass INTO the interior to him.
Our guards do not pass the ball in any type of programmed way; they simply give the other guys "a turn" every once in awhile.
You're telling me that our frontcourt is only shooting 7-24; I'm pointing out that Joe and Bibby control the ball and are ensuring that our frontcourt only shoots those type of lousy shots that create poor percentages such as 7 for 24.
As for Joe manning up, please note I said he scored the bulk of his points in the 1st qtr. You said if his game total "isn't manning up then i don't know what is," ignoring that I said he didn't man up in the clutch. So let me ask you:
Did Joe man up in the 2nd quarter?
Did Joe man up in the 3rd quarter?
Did Joe man up in the 4th quarter?
JJ was on the bench for nearly half of the second quarter and got extended bench time in the 2nd half as well when the game got out of hand. When he did get in he had Artest on him after lighting up Kobe in the first quarter. JJ has maned up in the clutch time and again but there was no clutch time in this game.
Smith and Horford combined for 9 turnovers, 6 field goals and 1 foul shot attempt. That sucks. If we had fed them the ball much more they might have had as many turnovers as the entire Lakers team. JJ and Bibby combined for only 1 turnover and shot 50% between them. it is pretty clear who should have been handling the ball. JJ got to the line 10 times by himself yet Smith and Horford could only get their once?
LOL @ Smith "having to go to the perimeter" to get the ball. He goes out there because he is too stupid to realize that he can't shoot. he goes out there because he knows the defense won't be guarding him and he will be wide open.
And then there is Woody's "offensive system"...
BAMABIRD wrote:He did say WE, so he's pointing fingers at himself as well. Personally I don't have a problem with the things Joe said. He's been with those young guys long enough to know the best way to get a message across to them.

parson wrote:By the way, this is an age-old problem in the NBA. The guys who dominate the ball scream at the other guys, "Why can't y'all help some?" when tough times come. Only problem is, the other guys have gotten used to standing back and letting the stars take over.
If Joe wants the others to step up, he'll have to give up the ball sometimes and do it in a way as to help them shine. The 1st game was a great example: Horford was having a monster game, but Joe and Bibby decided at the end that Horford had had enough and now it was their turn. That was a game when they should have just fed the big guy down low and celebrated his success. The defense didn't take the ball away from Horford - his own backcourt did.

parson wrote:By the way, this is an age-old problem in the NBA. The guys who dominate the ball scream at the other guys, "Why can't y'all help some?" when tough times come. Only problem is, the other guys have gotten used to standing back and letting the stars take over.
If Joe wants the others to step up, he'll have to give up the ball sometimes and do it in a way as to help them shine. The 1st game was a great example: Horford was having a monster game, but Joe and Bibby decided at the end that Horford had had enough and now it was their turn. That was a game when they should have just fed the big guy down low and celebrated his success. The defense didn't take the ball away from Horford - his own backcourt did.