Can anyone explain to me how it costed him the $20 mil?
That is a lot of money to lose out on
Moderators: dcash4, Phil X, tkb, snaquille oatmeal, Kno, Danny Darko, milesfides


DEEP3CL wrote:He lost his "Bird Rights" when he was traded to Houston.
DEEP3CL wrote:He lost his "Bird Rights" when he was traded to Houston.

That Nicka wrote:DEEP3CL wrote:He lost his "Bird Rights" when he was traded to Houston.
No, when he was traded to Houston, Houston obtained his bird rights. Since Houston didnt want to re-sign him, the only way for him to keep his bird rights was through a sign and trade.
Obviously the Lakers/Rockets could have done a sign and trade with Artest/Ariza but it would have cost both teams more money...
I doubt Artest could have made 20 mil more though... maybe 7 mil more (40 mil/5 years) is the most I could have seen a team pay for him
That Nicka wrote:DEEP3CL wrote:He lost his "Bird Rights" when he was traded to Houston.
No, when he was traded to Houston, Houston obtained his bird rights. Since Houston didnt want to re-sign him, the only way for him to keep his bird rights was through a sign and trade.
Obviously the Lakers/Rockets could have done a sign and trade with Artest/Ariza but it would have cost both teams more money...
I doubt Artest could have made 20 mil more though... maybe 7 mil more (40 mil/5 years) is the most I could have seen a team pay for him
DEEP3CL wrote:He lost his "Bird Rights" when he was traded to Houston.
Magicontinues wrote:That Nicka wrote:DEEP3CL wrote:He lost his "Bird Rights" when he was traded to Houston.
No, when he was traded to Houston, Houston obtained his bird rights. Since Houston didnt want to re-sign him, the only way for him to keep his bird rights was through a sign and trade.
Obviously the Lakers/Rockets could have done a sign and trade with Artest/Ariza but it would have cost both teams more money...
I doubt Artest could have made 20 mil more though... maybe 7 mil more (40 mil/5 years) is the most I could have seen a team pay for him
I doubt he would have even gotten 30 mill from another team, I think he was a guy that had a bad reputation, and teams (including Houston) were not going to spend that money on a guy that could hurt them, not help them. Especially in this economy, we overpaid for Artest, he just doesn't know it, I do.

XuDa wrote:Magic, Bird and the other 80#s HOF'ers were holding the league back and stunting it's development big time.
Kobe8Player wrote:[
I doubt he would have even gotten 30 mill from another team, I think he was a guy that had a bad reputation, and teams (including Houston) were not going to spend that money on a guy that could hurt them, not help them. Especially in this economy, we overpaid for Artest, he just doesn't know it, I do.[/
I don't like his comments at all but gosh what's wrong with you ? He has gotten better every game and he's been exactly what I wanted from him today and yesterday. You guys really think we would be better with Ariza right now ? No way.
dcash4 wrote:ron is wrong. why would anyone (rockets or in a sign n trade) sign ron to 5 yr 54 mil deal? certainly not the rockets even if they were going to keep him with his bird rights. he simply wasn't worth 10 mil a yr with someone like ariza available for much less.
Kobe8Player wrote:I don't like his comments at all but gosh what's wrong with you ? He has gotten better every game and he's been exactly what I wanted from him today and yesterday. You guys really think we would be better with Ariza right now ? No way.

