Artest Believes Losing Bird Rights Cost Him $20 Million

Moderators: dcash4, Phil X, tkb, snaquille oatmeal, Kno, Danny Darko, milesfides

Regional RealGM Forum Links
L.A. Dodgers | L.A. Angels | L.A. Kings | Anaheim Ducks

Artest Believes Losing Bird Rights Cost Him $20 Million

Postby Tommy Trojan on Thu Nov 05, 2009 11:38 am

Per wiretap: Artest Believes Losing Bird Rights Cost Him $20 Million

Can anyone explain to me how it costed him the $20 mil? :o

That is a lot of money to lose out on
Tommy Trojan
Assistant Coach
 
Posts: 4395
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 6:27 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Artest Believes Losing Bird Rights Cost Him $20 Million

Postby DEEP3CL on Thu Nov 05, 2009 11:54 am

He lost his "Bird Rights" when he was traded to Houston.
Image
User avatar
DEEP3CL
General Manager
 
Posts: 7743
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: LOS ANGELES AKA 10 RING CITY & 15 ALL TIME

Re: Artest Believes Losing Bird Rights Cost Him $20 Million

Postby Magicontinues on Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:18 pm

DEEP3CL wrote:He lost his "Bird Rights" when he was traded to Houston.


He's not a smart man, should have kept Ariza. Just zip it Ron, and play ball for the team you said you have always wanted to play for.
User avatar
Magicontinues
Junior
 
Posts: 303
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 8:40 am

Re: Artest Believes Losing Bird Rights Cost Him $20 Million

Postby iki4life on Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:51 pm

ron will be fine in LA...although ariza was just a better fit for our team.
User avatar
iki4life
Starter
 
Posts: 2066
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 3:20 pm

Re: Artest Believes Losing Bird Rights Cost Him $20 Million

Postby That Nicka on Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:55 pm

DEEP3CL wrote:He lost his "Bird Rights" when he was traded to Houston.



No, when he was traded to Houston, Houston obtained his bird rights. Since Houston didnt want to re-sign him, the only way for him to keep his bird rights was through a sign and trade.

Obviously the Lakers/Rockets could have done a sign and trade with Artest/Ariza but it would have cost both teams more money...

I doubt Artest could have made 20 mil more though... maybe 7 mil more (40 mil/5 years) is the most I could have seen a team pay for him
User avatar
That Nicka
General Manager
 
Posts: 9581
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 11:18 pm
Location: USC

Re: Artest Believes Losing Bird Rights Cost Him $20 Million

Postby TonyMontana on Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:57 pm

That Nicka wrote:
DEEP3CL wrote:He lost his "Bird Rights" when he was traded to Houston.



No, when he was traded to Houston, Houston obtained his bird rights. Since Houston didnt want to re-sign him, the only way for him to keep his bird rights was through a sign and trade.

Obviously the Lakers/Rockets could have done a sign and trade with Artest/Ariza but it would have cost both teams more money...

I doubt Artest could have made 20 mil more though... maybe 7 mil more (40 mil/5 years) is the most I could have seen a team pay for him

I agree
TonyMontana
General Manager
 
Posts: 8945
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 12:17 pm
Location: Loungin in the Cali sun.

Re: Artest Believes Losing Bird Rights Cost Him $20 Million

Postby Magicontinues on Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:11 pm

That Nicka wrote:
DEEP3CL wrote:He lost his "Bird Rights" when he was traded to Houston.



No, when he was traded to Houston, Houston obtained his bird rights. Since Houston didnt want to re-sign him, the only way for him to keep his bird rights was through a sign and trade.

Obviously the Lakers/Rockets could have done a sign and trade with Artest/Ariza but it would have cost both teams more money...

I doubt Artest could have made 20 mil more though... maybe 7 mil more (40 mil/5 years) is the most I could have seen a team pay for him



I doubt he would have even gotten 30 mill from another team, I think he was a guy that had a bad reputation, and teams (including Houston) were not going to spend that money on a guy that could hurt them, not help them. Especially in this economy, we overpaid for Artest, he just doesn't know it, I do.
User avatar
Magicontinues
Junior
 
Posts: 303
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 8:40 am

Re: Artest Believes Losing Bird Rights Cost Him $20 Million

Postby tkb on Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:13 pm

DEEP3CL wrote:He lost his "Bird Rights" when he was traded to Houston.


That's incorrect. He lost his Bird rights when Houston decided not to re-sign him or sign and trade him.
User avatar
tkb
Forum Mod
 
Posts: 10302
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 10:54 am
Location: Norway

Re: Artest Believes Losing Bird Rights Cost Him $20 Million

Postby Kobe8Player on Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:28 pm

Magicontinues wrote:
That Nicka wrote:
DEEP3CL wrote:He lost his "Bird Rights" when he was traded to Houston.



No, when he was traded to Houston, Houston obtained his bird rights. Since Houston didnt want to re-sign him, the only way for him to keep his bird rights was through a sign and trade.

Obviously the Lakers/Rockets could have done a sign and trade with Artest/Ariza but it would have cost both teams more money...

I doubt Artest could have made 20 mil more though... maybe 7 mil more (40 mil/5 years) is the most I could have seen a team pay for him



I doubt he would have even gotten 30 mill from another team, I think he was a guy that had a bad reputation, and teams (including Houston) were not going to spend that money on a guy that could hurt them, not help them. Especially in this economy, we overpaid for Artest, he just doesn't know it, I do.

I don't like his comments at all but gosh what's wrong with you ? He has gotten better every game and he's been exactly what I wanted from him today and yesterday. You guys really think we would be better with Ariza right now ? No way.
Image

XuDa wrote:Magic, Bird and the other 80#s HOF'ers were holding the league back and stunting it's development big time.

:lol:
User avatar
Kobe8Player
Starter
 
Posts: 2171
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 12:19 pm
Location: Estonia

Re: Artest Believes Losing Bird Rights Cost Him $20 Million

Postby Magicontinues on Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:48 pm

Kobe8Player wrote:[

I doubt he would have even gotten 30 mill from another team, I think he was a guy that had a bad reputation, and teams (including Houston) were not going to spend that money on a guy that could hurt them, not help them. Especially in this economy, we overpaid for Artest, he just doesn't know it, I do.[/
I don't like his comments at all but gosh what's wrong with you ? He has gotten better every game and he's been exactly what I wanted from him today and yesterday. You guys really think we would be better with Ariza right now ? No way.



I've never liked the guy, this is not something new for me to rip him. And when he says stupid things like he said in this article IE "the Lakers werent' my first choice", and "I lost 20 million" I just cringe, because he said just a couple months ago he's always wanted to be a Laker, and my thoughts about him being delusional and not good for any team resurface. We need/needed smart players to win rings, I hope he proves me wrong in that he can help us win more, but the dude is just not a smart guy, and that scares me having a dumb guy on my team.

Prove me wrong Artest, but in the meantime, just STFU and play ball would ya!!! :x :censored: :censored:
User avatar
Magicontinues
Junior
 
Posts: 303
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 8:40 am

Re: Artest Believes Losing Bird Rights Cost Him $20 Million

Postby dcash4 on Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:55 pm

ron is wrong. why would anyone (rockets or in a sign n trade) sign ron to 5 yr 54 mil deal? certainly not the rockets even if they were going to keep him with his bird rights. he simply wasn't worth 10 mil a yr with someone like ariza available for much less.
User avatar
dcash4
Forum Mod
 
Posts: 23759
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 12:48 am

Re: Artest Believes Losing Bird Rights Cost Him $20 Million

Postby lakersfanatic on Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:20 pm

that's ron being ron... always trying to add his own words into everything lol. I'm glad they played it out on court yesterday, it was fun to watch them battle it out eventhough they said it wasn't.

This comments basically shows he didn't mean to leave rockets in the cold like that. Just that they weren't going to give him what he wants.. actually no team would... so the next best is to take less and have a good run at a championship.
User avatar
lakersfanatic
Pro Prospect
 
Posts: 963
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 11:18 am

Re: Artest Believes Losing Bird Rights Cost Him $20 Million

Postby fareweatherfan on Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:35 pm

dcash4 wrote:ron is wrong. why would anyone (rockets or in a sign n trade) sign ron to 5 yr 54 mil deal? certainly not the rockets even if they were going to keep him with his bird rights. he simply wasn't worth 10 mil a yr with someone like ariza available for much less.


Bingo. He got the most any team was willing to pay.
Image
fareweatherfan
Junior
 
Posts: 405
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:04 pm

Re: Artest Believes Losing Bird Rights Cost Him $20 Million

Postby TonyMontana on Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:43 pm

Kobe8Player wrote:I don't like his comments at all but gosh what's wrong with you ? He has gotten better every game and he's been exactly what I wanted from him today and yesterday. You guys really think we would be better with Ariza right now ? No way.

Not at all. Im more than satisfied with Artest. Dont be shocked though Artest is going to basically be the ecape goat for everything that goes wrong with this team. You can already see that happening.
TonyMontana
General Manager
 
Posts: 8945
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 12:17 pm
Location: Loungin in the Cali sun.

Re: Artest Believes Losing Bird Rights Cost Him $20 Million

Postby DEEP3CL on Thu Nov 05, 2009 4:28 pm

It won't matter anyway, the next CBA won't favor the players in any shape form or fashion.......book it.
They're going to do away with a lot of the loopholes exposed over this decade.

Be happy Ron with what you got.......cause it'll be more than what these guys get from here on out.
Image
User avatar
DEEP3CL
General Manager
 
Posts: 7743
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: LOS ANGELES AKA 10 RING CITY & 15 ALL TIME

Next

Return to Los Angeles Lakers