we have to trust.klemen4 wrote:Hmmm...talent wise really bad trade but Larry brown game wise excellent trade...


hotrod wrote:http://espn.go.com/blog/truehoop/post/_/id/10397/dont-forget-bobcats-in-stephen-jackson-sweepstakes
I'm in. Jax would provide much needed scoring. Turiaf would add toughness, rebounding and shot blocking.


Bassman wrote:OK, if you're going to have a go at a radical remix, and righting some wrongs while doing it, and knowing you'll have to surrender some quality, try this:
Wallace and Diop for Jackson, Turiaf and Azubuike
Verified in Trade Checker #5270613
VERY HARD to give up Wallace, but look at the overall result. Jackson plays his best position (SF) and provides primary scoring (like Crash) but with slightly better outside shooting (but not as good on the boards). Azubuike becomes our starting SG, providing more scoring, better shooting, is young and could be our long term answer at the 2. Turiaf gives us a PF off the bench and a deep reserve at the 5. If Diaw is slacking we've got someone who's willing to hit the boards and work hard.
We get rid of our greatest contract albatross (DIOP) which is a big boat anchor drag on future movement. Diop looks like he'll never contribute anything, even after he got into "better" shape this offseason. While we give up our best player we add two impact players and get an important reserve at a need position. We still have Diaw and Bell who could factor into other trades later to obtain a significant starting PF.
Just some thoughts, it's an idea that I've expressed support for (getting Jackson), but I'm probably more inclined to deal DIaw thank Crash.

we have to trust.klemen4 wrote:Hmmm...talent wise really bad trade but Larry brown game wise excellent trade...

Battery wrote:Interesting that Don Nelson started Stephen Jackson at PF the other day and will again tonight. If we trade Diaw, we will need someone to play PF until we can find a real one. Turiaf has a bad knee so I don't think he would be a part of the trade even though we could use him if/when he gets healthy. But SJ playing PF makes me think there is something to the rumors of Jax coming here.
Bassman wrote:
Well, without Turiaf I cannot do this. Can't see Jackson playing the 4 on this team. What's the point of giving up Diaw for Jackson without getting back a significant additional player? I'd rather trade Bell and fodder for Jax in that case. Go with Chandler, Diaw, Wallace, Jax and Felts/DJ.
I appreciate the input from our friend on the left coast who is close to the Warriors. If they want Diaw, it's gotta include a PF with Jax. Unfortunately Wright is out but who knows if we could have gotten him anyway.
SWEDD523 wrote:Turiaf hasn't done a thing this year. Ask me, I'm his fantasy owner
I like the two trades on slightly different levels. Diaw for Jack works straight up. However, with their contracts being close, I would prefer to add Ajinca and BWright into the trade.
Felton/DJ/Flip
Raja/Flip/Graham/Hendo
Crash/Jack/UPS
Jack/BWright/Radman
Tyson/Nazr/Diop
This certainly opens up some room to package Felts, DJ, or Raja with Radman and one of our C's for a high caliber SG or PG. So it looks nice.
The idea the article suggested would be awesome if we somehow got them to agree. Radman and Nazr for Jack, Devean George, and Acie Law. It does unbalance our lineup though so another trade would have to be in the works.
Felton/DJ/Flip/Acie
Raja/Flip/Graham/Hendo
Crash/UPS/George
Jack/Diaw/Ajinca
Tyson/Diop