More from RealGM
NBA Wiretap Headlines
- Lakers Total Salary Bill Jumps From $86M To $112.7M
- Rockets Deny Reports Of Shouting Match
- Bibby Leaves Game With Sprained Ankle
- Dampier To Undergo More Tests
- Young Struggling With 76ers' New Offense
- Bosh Puts Free Agency Talk On Hold
- Knicks Send Nets To 13th Straight Loss
- Shaq Misses Fifth Straight Game
Boozer
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
27 posts • Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Boozer
by MBucks89 on Thu Nov 05, 2009 11:09 pm
it seems like hes on his way out in utah , anyway we make a move for him ? they desperately need someone at the 2 spot ... redd for boozer in some sort of deal ? idk guess lookin for insight on this
- MBucks89
- Freshman
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 7:26 pm
Re: Boozer
by Baddy Chuck on Thu Nov 05, 2009 11:11 pm
Redd makes too much for them to take on.
Brandon Jennings - Enough said......
- Baddy Chuck
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6619
- Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:08 pm
Re: Boozer
by MBucks89 on Thu Nov 05, 2009 11:16 pm
what kind of deal u think it would take to get him ? he would be nice for us.
- MBucks89
- Freshman
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 7:26 pm
Re: Boozer
by MikeIsGood on Thu Nov 05, 2009 11:17 pm
His struggles right now are surprising to me. He's in a contract year, and we're talking about Boozer here. Thought he would have started out stronger. He's had a tough time finding the bucket.
One down, one to go.
MickeyDavis wrote:It's a little known article in the CBA that if you buy a house you can't be traded. And if you buy four houses you can build a hotel.
-
MikeIsGood - RealGM
- Posts: 12711
- Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 12:43 pm
- Location: It's game time.
Re: Boozer
by JoeyMorgan619 on Thu Nov 05, 2009 11:31 pm
Isn't he pretty injury prone as well? I think that's the last thing we need around here.
Check my blog!
joeymorgan619.wordpress.com
-
JoeyMorgan619 - Sophomore
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 5:35 pm
- Location: Trying to get a taste of Brad Jennings table scraps
Re: Boozer
by Baddy Chuck on Thu Nov 05, 2009 11:31 pm
I really think we'd have no shot at Boozer unless we give up our first rounder and some solid expirings (Ridnour, Warrick and Thomas?) which IMO isn't really worth it since I think he'd leave anyways.
Utah is in a great position, they hold all the cards in any Boozer deal. Come the deadline there will most likely be a bunch of teams calling for Boozers help. Utah could get a pretty good piece for him.
Utah is in a great position, they hold all the cards in any Boozer deal. Come the deadline there will most likely be a bunch of teams calling for Boozers help. Utah could get a pretty good piece for him.
Brandon Jennings - Enough said......
- Baddy Chuck
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6619
- Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:08 pm
Re: Boozer
by Slipknotic2436 on Thu Nov 05, 2009 11:37 pm
I do believe that boozer has seen his share of the injury bug. and with his contract expiring i would say its probably best just to pass on boozer and get a young PF out of the draft to go along with brad jennings. Or if we are by some chance interested in boozer we could perhaps just sign him as a FA and give nothing for him(pending if he already got a new deal, or if we could even afford him).
- Slipknotic2436
- Ballboy
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:51 pm
Re: Boozer
by Garbs_7 on Thu Nov 05, 2009 11:42 pm
No thanks to Boozer. Good player but is 29 in a few weeks, terrible defensively and is all about the $. Proven to be disloyal and not play hard when his team needs him. Better options than him around including targetting young potential studs in the next two drafts.
Member since Jan '05 BEFORE BOGUT, been a Bucks fan for much longer.
paul wrote:We (Aussies) eat twirls for breakfast. Just don't hit us in the shin.
-
Garbs_7 - Rookie
- Posts: 1128
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 11:51 am
- Location: Perth, Australia
Re: Boozer
by DrugBust on Thu Nov 05, 2009 11:53 pm
He's an expiring contract. As long as it wouldn't take Brad or our 1st I'd love to dump some crappy contracts on Utah to get him.
This is the signature to be named later.
-
DrugBust - RealGM
- Posts: 30329
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2001 7:00 pm
- Location: game over man, game over
Re: Boozer
by Garbs_7 on Thu Nov 05, 2009 11:56 pm
DrugBust wrote:He's an expiring contract. As long as it wouldn't take Brad or our 1st I'd love to dump some crappy contracts on Utah to get him.
Why would Utah do that and lose a valuable trade asset?
Member since Jan '05 BEFORE BOGUT, been a Bucks fan for much longer.
paul wrote:We (Aussies) eat twirls for breakfast. Just don't hit us in the shin.
-
Garbs_7 - Rookie
- Posts: 1128
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 11:51 am
- Location: Perth, Australia
Re: Boozer
by DrugBust on Thu Nov 05, 2009 11:57 pm
Garbs_7 wrote:DrugBust wrote:He's an expiring contract. As long as it wouldn't take Brad or our 1st I'd love to dump some crappy contracts on Utah to get him.
Why would Utah do that and lose a valuable trade asset?
Did I say they would?
This is the signature to be named later.
-
DrugBust - RealGM
- Posts: 30329
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2001 7:00 pm
- Location: game over man, game over
Re: Boozer
by MikeIsGood on Fri Nov 06, 2009 12:13 am
I open my mouth and Boozer goes off for a near double-double in a half.
I should do so more often. He's on my fantasy team.
I should do so more often. He's on my fantasy team.
One down, one to go.
MickeyDavis wrote:It's a little known article in the CBA that if you buy a house you can't be traded. And if you buy four houses you can build a hotel.
-
MikeIsGood - RealGM
- Posts: 12711
- Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 12:43 pm
- Location: It's game time.
Re: Boozer
by UWM_Brew_Buck on Fri Nov 06, 2009 12:25 am
MikeIsGood wrote:I open my mouth and Boozer goes off for a near double-double in a half.
I should do so more often. He's on my fantasy team.
Mine too. I do think that Boozer would be a perfect fit for this team but we probably wouldn't be able to keep him long term. I have no problem in getting a Boozer rental as long as we don't give up any of our picks Luc or Jennings. It's sad that our only untradeables for a Boozer rental are Luc and Brad.
-
UWM_Brew_Buck - Junior
- Posts: 345
- Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 1:31 am
Re: Boozer
by jeremyd236 on Fri Nov 06, 2009 12:43 am
Boozer is unrealistic. They are looking to lose salary. They'll either keep him and simply lose it (which I doubt), or they'll acquire some young/good talent in return.
None of our junk could get Boozer.
None of our junk could get Boozer.
- jeremyd236
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4106
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 10:42 pm
- Location: Appleton, WI
27 posts • Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2