Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25



BDUB_30 wrote:Everyone that knows me knows that i am the ultimate authority on this game and am rarely if ever wrong when it comes to evaluating talent.
BDUB_30 wrote:Your foot always ends up in your mouth when you jump off a cliff so soon .

MartyConlonOnTheRun wrote:If Redd was healthy, they might consider it. Since he's not, no way.
LukePliska wrote:(This trade is assuming that Redd is healthy and plays well when he returns)

Ayt wrote:I think they'd want to keep one of West and Gibson.

Ayt wrote:I think they'd want to keep one of West and Gibson.

LukePliska wrote:So I read this morning that the Cavs owner is freaked that if they do not make The Finals that LeBron will leave. (This trade is assuming that Redd is healthy and plays well when he returns)
http://basketball.realgm.com/src_wireta ... ch_finals/
It got me thinking that the Bucks have some players that the Cavs could use.
The idea I was thinking of is:
Redd + Warrick + Thomas
for
Z + West + Gibson
Why would the Cavs do it? It gives them more firepower to compete with the other 'top 6' teams that have much more of it than they do. Redd can help carry the offense when LeBron is out of the game. They also have a ton of problems defending perimeter based 4's and Warrick would help them a ton in that area... Even though he isn't a great defender, he can at least get out there on guys like Lewis and Sheed, who the Cavs have no answer for right now. Kurt Thomas would of course take Z's place as the back-up center.
Why would the Bucks do it? To cut a majority of Redd's salary with Z's contract. They would also get a decent replacement as a starter in West who can space the floor and a guy in Gibson who can give us some much needed outside shooting and a legit scoring punch off of the bench.
I honestly think this would be an excellent trade for both teams.




